Studying the Effect of New Didactic Tool on the Effectiveness of Educational Activity

  • Authors

    • Irina Yurievna Glazkova
    • Tatiana Mikhailovna Litvinova
    • Olga Mikhailovna Kolomiets
    • Olga Alexandrovna Smyslova
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24441
  • Didactic tool, Educational process, efficiency of educational activity.

  • Abstract

    This article presents the results of studies devoted to assessing the survival of students' knowledge, regardless of their basic training. The study was conducted based on two groups of specialists, recertified under the program "Pharmacy management and economics" at the Pharmacy Department of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. Some of the specialists of the experimental groups had been previously trained at the Pharmacy Department of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University in 2012-2013 using a new developed didactic tool named "Activity Book". According to the results obtained, the skills acquired by the specialists trained using on "Activity Book" in 2012-2013, were characterized by higher "survivability".

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Belogurova VA (2003), Nauchnaya organizaciya uchebnogo processa [Scientific organization of educational process]. Textbook for postgraduate education students. Moscow: Medicine.

      [2] Galperin PYa (1966), Psihologiya myshleniya i uchenie o poehtapnom formirovanii umstvennyh dejstvij [Thinking psychology and the doctrine of the gradual formation of mental actions]. Studies of thinking in Soviet psychology. Moscow: Nauka, 236-277.

      [3] Galperin PYa (2003), Psihologiya kak ob"ektivnaya nauka [Psychology as an objective science]. Ed. A.I. Podolsky. Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow Psychological and Social Institute.

      [4] Reshetova ZA (2002), Formirovanie sistemnogo myshleniya v obuchenii [Formation of systematic thinking in education]. Moscow: Unity, 219-236.

      [5] Zmeev SI (2007), Andragogika: osnovy teorii, istorii i tekhnologii obucheniya vzroslyh [Andragogy: Fundamentals of theory, history and adult education technology]. Moscow: PER SE.

      [6] Integraciya metodicheskoj raboty i sistemy povysheniya kvalifikacii kadrov [Integration of methodical work and professional development system]. Proceedings of the X All-Russian science-to-practice conference. Part 6, Moscow-Chelyabinsk, 2009, pp. 107-112.

      [7] Litvinova TM, Glazkova IU, Kolomiets OM, Smyslova OA & Denisova MN (2017), Using case method in organizing student academic/professional activity as part of the educational process. Espacios 38(56), 291-305.

      [8] Reshetova ZA & Samonenko YuA (1982), Sistemnyj tip orientirovki v predmete i ehvristicheskie vozmozhnosti uchashchihsya [Systematic type of orientation in the subject and heuristic possibilities of students]. Bulletin of the Moscow State University 24(1), Psychology, 20-29.

      [9] Talyzina NF (1986), Teoreticheskie osnovy razrabotki modeli specialista [Theoretical bases of specialist model development]. Moscow.

      [10] Reshetova ZA (2002), Formirovanie sistemnogo myshleniya v obuchenii [Formation of systematic thinking in training]. Study guide for higher education institutions. Moscow: Unity.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Yurievna Glazkova, I., Mikhailovna Litvinova, T., Mikhailovna Kolomiets, O., & Alexandrovna Smyslova, O. (2018). Studying the Effect of New Didactic Tool on the Effectiveness of Educational Activity. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 199-200. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24441

    Received date: 2018-12-20

    Accepted date: 2018-12-20

    Published date: 2018-12-03