Insult as a Linguistic and Legal Phenomenon

  • Authors

    • Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva
    • Elena Viktorovna Bolgova
    • Irina Mikhailovna Shadrina
    • Anna Vladimirovna Gushchina
    • Sergey Borisovich Nikonov
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24447
  • Insult, Linguist’s competence, Obscene vocabulary.

  • Abstract

    In the article, on the material of the texts of linguistic expertise on cases of insult, the main problems and ways of their solution in conducting forensic linguistic expertise of a case of insult in the courtroom are presented. It was stated that when conducting linguistic expertise of conflicting statements, it is not a verbal strategy of achieving the result that matters, but an attack on a person's honor, dignity, and business reputation. The need to include extralinguistic and pragmatic factors in the attention of linguistics expert is emphasized: the focus of insult on a particular person, gestures and the indication of part-of-speech characteristics of the analyzed word.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Kusov GV (2004), Oskorblenie kak illokutivnyi lingvokulturnyi kontsept: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Insult as an Illocutive Linguocultural Concept (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Krasnodar.

      [2] Speranskaya AN (1999), Oskorblenie slovom v obydennom i pravovom soznanii nositelei russkogo yazyka [Insulting with Words in Ordinary and Legal Consciousness of Russian Native Speakers]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-1: Problemy i perspektivy, 89-95.

      [3] Chernyshova TV (2014), Filologicheskie aspekty russkoi pravovoi kultury (na materiale rechevogo akta oskorbleniya) [Philological Aspects of Russian Legal Culture (Based on the Speech Act of Insult)]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kultury, 3(45), 389-391.

      [4] Araeva, LA & Osadchii MA (2006), Problemy sudebno-lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy v ramkakh del o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva, o klevete i oskorblenii [Problems of Forensic Linguistic Expertise within the Framework of Cases of Protection of Honor and Dignity, Libel and Insult]. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2, 86-94.

      [5] Baranov AN & Vinogradov VV, Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i praktika: ucheb. posobie [Linguistic Expertise of the Text: Theoretical Grounds and Practice: Training Manual] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Flinta, Nauka, 2009.

      [6] Ivanenko GS (2016), Oskorblenie kak polidiskursivnyi i polifunktsionalnyi fenomen [Insult as a Polydiscursive and Polyfunctional Phenomenon]. Meteor-Siti, 1, 72-74.

      [7] Izotova TM, Kuznetsov VO & Plotnikova AM (2016), Metodika provedeniya sudebnoi lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy po delam ob oskorblenii [Methodology of Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Cases of Insult]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy, 1(41), 92-98.

      [8] Podkatilina ML (2016), Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza po delam ob oskorblenii [Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Insult Cases]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 3-2, 389-394.

      [9] Kuznetsov SA (2000), Bolshoi tolkovyi slovar russkogo yazyka [Big Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg: Norint.

      [10] Khimik VV (2004), Bolshoi slovar russkoi razgovornoi ekspressivnoi rechi [The Big Dictionary of the Russian Colloquial Expressive Speech]. St. Petersburg: Norint, 27.

      [11] Mokienko VM & Nikitina TG (2000), Bolshoi slovar russkogo zhargona: 25000 slov. 7000 ustoichivykh sochetanii [Big Dictionary of Russian Jargon: 25,000 Words. 7,000 Fixed Expressions]. St. Petersburg: Norint.

      [12] Zhukov VP (2004), Slovar russkikh poslovits i pogovorok [Dictionary of Russian Proverbs and Sayings] (11th ed.). Moscow: Russkii yazyk; Media.

      [13] Grigorieva SA, Grigoriev NV & Kreidlin GE (2001), Slovar yazyka russkikh zhestov [Dictionary of the Language of Russian Gestures]. Moscow: Yazyli russkoi kultury; Vienna: Wiener Slawistiscer Almanach.

      [14] Issers O (1999), Svoboda slova: dve storony medali (oskorblenie v zerkale yurisprudentsii i lingvistiki) [Freedom of Speech: Two Sides of the Medal (Insult in the Mirror of Jurisprudence and Linguistics)]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-1: Problemy i perspektivy, 108-124.

      [15] Gridina TA & Tretyakova VS (2002), Printsipy lingvokognitivnogo analiza konfliktnogo vyskazyvaniya [Principles of the Linguistic Cognitive Analysis of a Conflicting Utterance]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 55-64.

      [16] Gorbanevsky MV (2006), Kak provesti lingvisticheskuyu ekspertizu spornogo teksta? Pamyatka dlya sudei, yuristov SMI, advokatov, prokurorov, sledovatelei, doznavatelei i ekspertov [How to Conduct Linguistic Expertise of a Contentious Text? Memo for Judges, Media Lawyers, Attorneys, Prosecutors, Investigators, Investigating Officers and Experts]. Moscow: Yuridicheskii mir.

      [17] Orlova OV (2002), K voprosu o roli kommunikativnogo podkhoda v lingvisticheskoi ekspertize [On the Role of the Communicative Approach in Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 65-71.

      [18] Pachina AN (2015), Leksicheskii aspekt ponyatiya "oskorblenie": k voprosu o sredstvakh yazykovogo vyrazheniya oskorbleniya [Lexical Aspect of the Concept "Insult": On the Means of Linguistic Expression of Insult]. In Aktualnye voprosy izucheniya yazyka, literatury i zhurnalistiki: Materialy X Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii 24-26 noyabrya 2015 g. [Relevant Issues of Studying the Language, Literature and Journalism: Materials of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference held on November 24-26, 2015]. Abakan: FSBEU HPE "N.F. Katanov Khakas State University", 142-145.

      [19] Shabanov MM (2010), Osobennosti provedeniya sudebnoi lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy po delam ob oskorblenii [Peculiarities of Carrying out Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Insult Cases]. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2, 175-179.

      [20] Golev ND (2002), Aktualnye problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy [Acute Problems of Forensic Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 5-13.

      [21] Kaplenko VN, Invektivnost otkrytaya i skrytaya [Open and Hidden Invectivity]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-3: Problemy yurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy, 71-76.

      [22] Sypchenko SV (2000), O tipakh invektivnykh tekstov kak obekte lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy problema [On the Types of Invective Texts as an Object of Linguistic Expertise]. Barnaul: ASU Publishing House, Yurislingvistika-2: Russkii yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii, 213-220.

      [23] Brinev KI (2014), Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza: metodologiya i metodika: monografiya [Forensic Linguistic Expertise: Methodology and Methods: Monograph]. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva, O., Viktorovna Bolgova, E., Mikhailovna Shadrina, I., Vladimirovna Gushchina, A., & Borisovich Nikonov, S. (2018). Insult as a Linguistic and Legal Phenomenon. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 216-219. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24447

    Received date: 2018-12-20

    Accepted date: 2018-12-20

    Published date: 2018-12-03