Modern Risk Management Strategies: Framework Platforms to Minimize Disaster Threats in Eurasian Regions

  • Authors

    • Vladimir N. Lukin
    • Alexander V. Matveev
    • Tamara V. Musienko
    • Eduard N. Chizhikov
    • Yuri E. Aktersky
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24493
  • The United Nations, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, Regional Platform, Eurasia, Central Emergency Response Fund, Integrated Security, Geopolitics, Geoeconomy, the EMERCOM of Russia, Arctic, Arctic Complex Rescue Centers, Indexes, Indicators.
  • Abstract

    The main content and problems of implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Eurasian geopolitical and geoeconomic space, and the formation of framework platforms in various Eurasian regions are actualized in the article. The legal and economic basics of the Russian platform are revealed through the example of the integrated security system in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. The place and role of the EMERCOM of Russia in implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, its contribution to the development of indicators, and terminology related to disaster risk reduction are shown.

     

     

     
  • References

    1. [1] Shakhanova G (2017), The architecture of security in the Eurasian Region: Is Russia still a guarantor of regional security? East-West Studies, 8, 45–52.

      [2] Jackson NJ (2014), Trans-regional security organisations and
      statist multilateralism in Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies, 66 (2), 181–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2015.11.001.

      [3] Khamzin AS, Buribayev YA, Karasheva ZT, Yermukhametova S, Vorivodina AR (2015), Forms and mechanisms of regional cooperation between the Eurasian Economic Union countries in the field of social security. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (6 S7), pp. 56. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s7p56.

      [4] Mavlyanova NG, Lipatov VA, Yuldashev OR (2018), Transboundary problems of overcoming natural disasters for international regional organizations in the eurasian region. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29 (3), 322–328. DOI: 10.1134/
      S1075700718030097

      [5] Mokhov II, Chernokulsky AV (2010), Regional model assessments of forest fire risks in the Asian part of Russia under climate change. Geography and Natural Resources, 31 (2), 165–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.gnr.2010.06.012.

      [6] Goldammer JG & Stocks BJ (2000), Eurasian perspective of fire: dimension, management, policies, and scientific requirements. in E.S. Kasischke and B.J. Stocks (editors): Fire, Climate Change, and Carbon Cycling in the Boreal Forest. New York, Springer-Verlag, Ecological Studies, 138, 49-65.

      [7] Sergeev I, Krasilnikova E, Mukhutdinova S (2017), Monitoring food security and safety in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 19, 49–54.

      [8] Katzenstein PJ, Weygandt N (2017), Mapping Eurasia in an open world: how the insularity of Russia’s geopolitical and civilizational approaches limits its foreign policies. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 428–442. DOI: 10.1017/S153759271700010X.

      [9] Kirkham K (2016), The formation of the Eurasian Economic
      Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 111–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.
      2015.06.002.

      [10] Lukin A (2018), Russia, China, and the emerging greater Eurasia. International Relations and Asia’s Northern Tier, Singapore: Palgrave, 75–91. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3144-1_5.

      [11] UN Doc (2015). A/RES/69/283. Resolution 69/283. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.un.org/
      en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/69/283. Revised June 2015. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [12] UNISDR (2005), (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf. Revised January 2005. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [13] Weterings R, Bastein T, Tukker A, Rademaker M, Ridder de M (2013), Resources for our future. Key issues and best practices in resource efficiency. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

      [14] Manyena SB (2006), The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30 (4), 434–450. DOI: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x.

      [15] Aitsi-Selmi A, Egawa S, Sasaki H, Wannous Ch, Murray V (2015), The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: Renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 164–176. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9.

      [16] Kelman I (2015), Climate change and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 117–127. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-015-0046-5.

      [17] Chatterjee R, Shiwaku K, Das Gupta R, Nakano G, Shaw R (2015), Bangkok to Sendai and beyond: Implications for disaster risk reduction in Asia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0055-4

      [18] Carabine E (2015), Revitalising evidence-based policy for the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030: Lessons from existing international science partnerships. PLOS Currents Disasters. http://currents.plos.org/disasters/article/policy-for-the-sendai-framework-for-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030-lessons-from-existing-international-science-partnerships-2/ Revised April 2015. Accessed September 7, 2018. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.aaab45b
      2b4106307ae2168a485e03b8a.

      [19] Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton Ch, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008), A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), pp. 598-606. doi: 10.1016/
      j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013.

      [20] UN Doc (2015). A/RES/70/1. Resolution 70/1. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf. Revised October 2015. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [21] Hacker JS, Huber GA, Nichols A, Rehm Ph, Schlesinger M, Valletta R, Craig S (2014), The economic security index: a new measure for research and policy analysis. Review of Income and Wealth, 60 (S1), 5–32.

      [22] Strezov V, Evans A, Evans TJ (2017), Assessment of the economic, social and environmental dimensions of the indicators
      for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 242–253.

      [23] Schwab K (2015), World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. Available from: www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_
      Report_2015-2016.pdf. Revised January 2015. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [24] Chizhikov EN (2017), EMERCOM of Russia as a tool for ensuring economic security. National Safety and Strategic Planning,
      2-2 (18), 152–160.

      [25] CSTO (2017), Declaration of the heads of the CSTO member states in connection with the 25th anniversary of the Collective Security Treaty and the 15th anniversary of the creation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. Adopted by the CSTO Collective Security Council in Minsk on November 30, 2017. http://www.odkb-csto.org/session/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=12027. Revised November 2011. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [26] UN News (2016), UN agency launches appeal to reach over 340,000 with assistance in crisis-struck Ukraine. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/04/1007442. Revised April 2016. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [27] UN News (2018), Ukraine crisis ‘forgotten by the world,’ senior UN relief official says, urging greater global support. https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/03/1003891. Revised March 2018. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [28] UNESCAP (2017), E/ESCAP/RES/73/7. Resolution adopted by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Resolution 73/7. Enhancing regional cooperation for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 in Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unescap.org/commission/
      73/document/E73_RES7E.pdf. Revised May 2017. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [29] UNESCAP (2016), Dushanbe Declaration on Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience Building. https://www.unisdr.org/we/
      inform/publications/51203. Revised July 2016. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [30] UN CERF (2014), General information. www.unocha.org/
      cerf/sites/default/files/CERF/About_CERF_20141215_rus.pdf. Revised December 2014. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [31] EMERCOM of Russia (2003), Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2003 â„–794 “On Unified State System for the Prevention and Elimination of Emergency Situationsâ€. www.mchs.gov.ru/law/Postanovlenija_Pravitelstva_RF/
      item/5379463 Revised December 2003. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [32] Arctic Council (2013), Agreement on cooperation on marine oil pollution preparedness and response in the Arctic. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/529. Revised May 2013. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [33] Arctic Council (2011), Agreement on cooperation on aeronautical and maritime search and rescue in the Arctic. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/531. Revised May 2011. Accessed September 7, 2018.

      [34] Lukin VN, Musienko TV, Chizhikov EN (2016), Geoeconomic and political features of the integrated security system of the Russian Arctic. VESTNIK OF MSTU, 2(19), 443–450. DOI: 10.21443/1560-9278-2016-2-443-450.

      [35] Matveev AV (2017), The strategic planning of forces and equipment of the EMERCOM of Russia in the Arctic zone. National Safety and Strategic Planning, 4(20), 32–42.

      [36] UN General Assembly (2016), A/71/644. Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/50683_oiewgreportenglish.pdf. Revised December 2016. Accessed September 7, 2018.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    N. Lukin, V., V. Matveev, A., V. Musienko, T., N. Chizhikov, E., & E. Aktersky, Y. (2018). Modern Risk Management Strategies: Framework Platforms to Minimize Disaster Threats in Eurasian Regions. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 320-325. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24493

    Received date: 2018-12-21

    Accepted date: 2018-12-21

    Published date: 2018-12-03