Analysis of the Conflict Resolution Technologies Training Impact in the Sphere of Local Self-Government on the Formation of Conflict Resolution Competency

  • Authors

    • A. A. Maslikov
    • A. N. Ostrovskii
    • Ju. O.Sulyagina
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24496
  • Conflict, Local-government, Mediation, Sustainable development, Technology.

  • Abstract

    The article is devoted to demonstrating the adaptation of the most effective forms of social interaction associated with the practice of resolving social conflicts. Such forms of conflict resolution were taken by authors from the description of the stable interaction of the Russian community in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There is a methodology of “Village meeting†(“Sel’skij skhod†in rus.) based on the analysis of the main points focused on the conflict resolution of the Russian community. The main task of the training is to realize the importance of using traditional socio-cultural technologies with a high degree of efficiency. The authors have received an answer to the question of the influence of training in conflict management technologies on the sphere of local self-government with the formation of conflictological competencies in resolving social conflicts based on the traditional Russian practices of self-government and its reconciliation, “Village meeting†(“Sel’skij skhodâ€). Approbation of results of the methodology allows to detect number of significant qualities, such as solidarity, unity, penitence, collective responsibility, and the ability to adequately assess the various forms of relationships.

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Bondaletov VV & Maslikov VA (2017), Evolution of sociological knowledge in the field of self-organization of society Economic and Social Development. Book of Proceedings. Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency; Russian State Social University, 1075-1081.

      [2] Maslikov VA (2016), The management concepts in Pre-revolution Russia. Materials athanasian readings, 1(14), 22-31.

      [3] Lur’e S (1992), Statism and Community of Russia. Znanie-sila, 10, 3-11.

      [4] Maslikov VA (2017), Sociohistorical analysis of problems and advantages of the Russian community. Materials athanasian readings, 1(18), 116-125.

      [5] Starikov E (1994), Obschina: ot russkoy “marki†k uravnitelnyim peredelam. Znanie-sila, 3, 16-24, 4, 62-70.

      [6] Platonov OA (1991), Russian labor. Moscow: Sovremennik.

      [7] Kaufmann AA (2011), Russian community in process of generation and evolution. Moscow: Librocom.

      [8] Baynova MS, Kozyrev MS, Palekhova PV & Petrov AV (2017), The state regulation of the religion relations in Czechoslovakia on the example of the Orthodox community. Espacios, 38(57), 33.

      [9] Köhler J (2013), Globalization and Sustainable Development: Case Study on International Transport and Sustainable Development. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(1), 66-100.

      [10] Coronado Escobar, JE & Vasquez Urriago AR (2014), Gamification: An effective mechanism to promote civic engagement and generate trust? Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Guimaraes, Portugal: ACM, 514-515.

      [11] Bondaletov AA (2015), Evolution of self-organization ideas. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 3, 132-139.

      [12] Yudina TN, Bondaletov AA, Mazaev YuN, Bormotova TM & Dolgorukova IV (2017), Public evaluation of police activities. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 4, 52-59.

      [13] Rogach OV, Ryabova TM, Frolova EV, Evstratova TA & Kozyrev M.S (2018), Social and psychological climate in state authorities. Espacios, 39(11), 19-28.

      [14] Christy N (1999), Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 28-45.

      [15] Zehr H (1990), Changing Lenses: a new focus for crime and justice a Cristian Peace and Justice. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.

      [16] Maksudov RR (2012), Community circles: towards the creation of the Russian model. School reconciliation services and inter-ethnic conflict prevention. Moscow: Non-Profit Research Foundation “Prosveschenieâ€, 7-20.

      [17] Maksudov RR, Martyinova MYu, Nikiporets-Takigava GYu & Ostrovskiy AN (2017), Sovremennyie instrumentyi obespecheniya obschestvennogo soglasiya v usloviyah razvivayuschihsya territoriy/ Imidzh i marketing territoriy: opyit i perspektivyi razvitiya v biznese, kulture, turizme i obrazovanii Materialyi XV mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po imidzhelogii, 106-118.

      [18] Sycheva OA (2012), The evolution of communities in the world (within the concept of dynamic system matrices). Modern economy: problems, tendencies, perspectives 6.

      [19] Pranis K, Stuart B & Wedge M (2003), PeaÑemaking Сircles: From Crime to Community. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.

      [20] Kirilov NP (2010), Eco-psychological approach to modeling ecological culture of scholar. Social policy and sociology, 9(63), 114-127.

      [21] Kataeva VI (2011), Sotsialnoe proektirovanie [Social project planning]. Moscow.

      [22] Fomicheva T, Sulyagina Ju, Kataeva V, Kryukova E & Dusenko S (2017), Transformation of values in global society: managerial aspect. Espacios, 38(33), 31.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    A. Maslikov, A., N. Ostrovskii, A., & O.Sulyagina, J. (2018). Analysis of the Conflict Resolution Technologies Training Impact in the Sphere of Local Self-Government on the Formation of Conflict Resolution Competency. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 335-341. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24496

    Received date: 2018-12-21

    Accepted date: 2018-12-21

    Published date: 2018-12-03