Modern Philological Knowledge: Anthropocentrism and Linguistic Identity

  • Authors

    • Arkadiy Petrovich Sedykh
    • Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva
    • Anastasiya Vyacheslavovna Koreneva
    • Inna Vitalyevna Ryzhkova
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24601
  • Cognition, Communicative behavior, Connotative background, Emotionality, Ethnoculturalism, Expressivity, Linguistic persona, Linguistic worldview, Nuclear seme, Semiotics of cognition and communication.

  • Abstract

    The article aims at analyzing the actual status of the "linguistic persona" category in the modern linguistic studies both in Russia and abroad. It is shown that the anthropocentric paradigm dominates in modern scientific knowledge. A linguistic persona is viewed as a certain type of linguistic identity functioning within the specific ways to exchange communicative information. The epistemology of scientific approaches and research concepts is regarded in the personological way. Universal and national and cultural ways of a person’s verbalization are associated with a certain type of categorization of reality. The prospects of studying ways to verbalize the linguistic identity are viewed within the scope of the comprehensive analysis of communicative behavior based on the interdisciplinary approach. Using this method allows separating additional parameters of a linguistic persona of any type. The elements of the institutional linguistic persona are reviewed.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Yazykovaya lichnost: tekst, slovar, obraz mira. K 70-letiyu chlena-korr. RAN Yu.N. Karaulova: sb. statei [Linguistic Persona: Text, Vocabulary, Image of the World. For the 70th Birthday of Karaulov, Yu.N., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Collection of Articles]. Moscow: Publishing House of the RUDN University, 2006.

      [2] Vorozhbitova AA (2012), Interpretativnaya kultura yazykovoi lichnosti kak instrument izucheniya diskursivnykh protsessov: teoriya i metodika formirovaniya v lingvoritoricheskoi paradigme [Interpretative Culture of the Linguistic Persona as the Instrument of Studying Discourse Processes: The Theory and Methodology of Formation within the Linguorhetoric Paradigm]. Vestnik SGUT i KD 2(20), 197-200.

      [3] Karassik VI (2000), O tipakh diskursa [On Types of Discourse]. In: Yazykovaya lichnost: institutsionalnyi i personalnyi diskurs: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Linguistic Persona: Institutional and Personal Discourse. Collection of Research Papers]. Volgograd: Peremena.

      [4] Sedykh AP (2013), Frantsuzskaya yazykovaya lichnost. Kognitivno-kommunikativnyi aspekt [French Linguistic Persona. The Cognitive and Communicative Aspect]. Belgorod: Belgorod Publishing House.

      [5] Kryssin LP (2001), Sovremennyi russkii intelligent: popytka rechevogo portreta [Modern Member of the Russian Intelligentsia: An Attempt of a Speech Portrait]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii 1, 90-106.

      [6] Nikolayeva TM (1991), "Sotsiolingvisticheskii portret" i metody ego opisaniya ["Sociolinguistic Portrait" and Methods to Describe It]. In: Russkii yazyk i sovremennost. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya rusistiki. Doklady Vsesoyuznoi nauchnoi konferentsii [The Russian Language and Modern Times. Problems and Prospects of Russian Studies. Reports of the All-Soviet Union Scientific Conference]. Moscow.

      [7] Parsamova VYa (2004), Yazykovaya lichnost uchenogo v epistolyarnykh tekstakh: Na materiale pisem Yu.M. Lotmana: avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk [The Linguistic Persona of a Scientist in Epistolary Texts: As Exemplified in Letters by Lotman, Yu.M. (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)]. Saratov.

      [8] Frumkina RM (1987), Moi uchitel A.A. Reformatskii [My teacher – Reformatsky, A.A.]. Znanie – sila, 7.

      [9] Tolstoy NI (1997), Etnolingvistika v krugu gumanitarnykh distsiplin [Ethnolinguistics among the Humanities]. In: Russkaya slovesnost. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Antologiya [Russian Philology. From the Theory of Philology to the Structure of Text. Anthology]. Moscow.

      [10] Vorkachev SG (2001), Lingvokulturologiya, yazykovaya lichnost, kontsept: stanovlenie antropotsentricheskoi paradigmy v yazykoznanii [Linguoculturology, a Linguistic Persona, a Concept: Evolvement of the Anthropocentric Paradigm in Linguistics]. Filologicheskie nauki 1, 64-72.

      [11] Weisgerber JL (1993), Rodnoi yazyk i formirovanie dukha [Muttersprache und Geistesbildung] (Trans. from German). Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow State University.

      [12] Vorobyov VV (1998), Yazykovaya lichnost i natsionalnaya ideya [The Linguistic Persona and the National Idea]. Narodnoe obrazovanie 5, 25-30.

      [13] Karassik VI (2007). Evolyutsiya i involyutsiya kontseptov [Evolution and Involution of Concepts. In: Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy lingvokontseptologii i lingvokulturnykh tipazhei [Axiological Linguistics: Problems of Linguoconceptology and Linguocultural Types]. Volgograd.

      [14] Stepanov YuS (1998), Yazyk i metod. K sovremennoi filosofii yazyka [Language and Method. Regarding the Modern Philosophy of Language]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kultury.

      [15] Vinogradov VV (1980), Izbrannye trudy. O yazyke khudozhestvennoi prozy [Selected Works. On the Language of Fiction]. Moscow: Nauka.

      [16] Karaulov YuN (2002), Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost [The Russian Language and the Language Persona]. Moscow: URSS.

      [17] Karassik VI (2002), Yazykovoi krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs [The Language Circle: Persona, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena.

      [18] Karassik VI & Dmitrieva OA (2005), Lingvokulturnyi tipazh: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya [The Linguocultural Type: On Defining the Term]. In: V.I. Karassik & O.A. Dmitriyeva, Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: lingvokulturnye tipazhi [Axiological Linguistics: Linguocultural Types]. Volgograd: Paradigma.

      [19] Snitko TN, Predelnye ponyatiya v zapadnoi i vostochnoi lingvokulturakh [Limit Notions in Western and Eastern Linguocultures]. Pyatigorsk, 1999.

      [20] Valitova N. (2007). Vospitanie professionalnoi yazykovoi lichnosti na osnove formirovaniya professionalnogo tezaurusa spetsialista v oblasti fizicheskoi kultury i sporta [Building a Professional Linguistic Persona Based on Creating a Professional Thesaurus of a Physical Training and Sports Specialist]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoi kultury 8, 51-54.

      [21] Aznacheyeva EN (2009), K probleme tipologizatsii professionalnoi yazykovoi lichnosti muzykanta [Regarding the Problem of Classification of a Musician’s Professional Linguistic Persona]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 43, 5-9.

      [22] Kudryavtseva EE (2009), Yazykovaya lichnost v protsesse lingvoobrazovatelnoi podgotovki spetsialista [Linguistic Persona within the Process of a Specialist’s Linguoeducational Training]. In: Inostrannye yazyki: lingvisticheskii i metodicheskii aspekty: Mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Foreign Languages: Linguistic and Methodological Aspects: Inter-University Collection of Research Papers]. Saratov: Institute of Pedagogy, Saratov State University.

      [23] Bushev AB (2010), Yazykovaya lichnost professionalnogo perevodchika. [The linguistic Persona of a Professional Interpreter.]. Tver: OOO "Laboratoriya delovoi grafiki".

      [24] Akayeva EV (2011), Yazykovaya lichnost vracha – vedushchego nauchno-populyarnoi meditsinskoi programmy [The Linguistic Persona of a Doctor – Presenter of a Popular-Science Medical TV Program]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 24, 189-190.

      [25] Popova TG (2003), Ispanskii nauchno-tekhnicheskii tekst: traditsii i sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu [Scientific and Technical Texts in Spanish: Traditions and Modern Approaches to Studying]. Moscow: Publishing House of the RUDN University.

      [26] Sedykh AP, Baghana J & Langner AN (2010), Russko-frantsuzskii slovar: professionalnaya i obydennaya kommunikatsiya [Russian-French Dictionary: Professional and Everyday Communication]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.

      [27] Lotman YuM (1999), Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriya [Inside the Thinking Minds. A Man – A Text – The Semiosphere – The History]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kultury.

      [28] Neroznak VP (1996), Lingvisticheskaya personologiya: k opredeleniyu statusa distsipliny [Linguistic Personology: Regarding the Definition of the Discipline’s Status]. In: V.P. Neroznak, Yazyk. Poetika. Perevod. Sb. nauch. tr. [Language. Poetics. Translation. Collection of Research Papers]. Moscow.

      [29] Sirotinina OB (2000), Khoroshaya rech: sdvigi v predstavlenii ob etalone [Good Speech: Shifts in Concepts of the Standard]. In: O.B. Sirotinina, Aktivnye yazykovye protsessy kontsa XX veka [Active Language Processes of the End of the 20th Century]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.

      [30] Shakhovsky VI (1996), Natsio- i sotsiokulturnye aspekty yazykovoi lichnosti [National and Sociocultural Aspects of Linguistic Persona]. In: Obshchestvo, yazyk i lichnost: Materialy Vseros. nauch. konf., Penza, 23-26 okt. 1996 g. [Society, Language and Person. Materials of the All-Russia Scientific Conference, Penza, October 23-26, 1996]. Moscow.

      [31] Jakobson R (1987), Raboty po poetike [Linguistics and Poetics]. Moscow: Progress.

      [32] Kassevich VB (2001), Teoriya kommunikatsii i teoriya yazyka [The Theory of Communication and the Theory of Language]. In: V.B. Kassevich, Govoryashchii i slushayushchii: Yazykovaya lichnost, tekst, problemy obucheniya [Speaker and Listener: Linguistic Persona, Text, Problems of Education]. Saint Petersburg.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Petrovich Sedykh, A., Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva, O., Vyacheslavovna Koreneva, A., & Vitalyevna Ryzhkova, I. (2018). Modern Philological Knowledge: Anthropocentrism and Linguistic Identity. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24601

    Received date: 2018-12-22

    Accepted date: 2018-12-22

    Published date: 2018-12-03