Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary

  • Authors

    • Olga Vladimirovna Tretyakova
    • Olga Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva
    • Anna Vladimirovna Gushchina
    • Ekaterina Vladimirovna Tretiakovich
    • Viktoria Gennadievna Piksendeeva
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24624
  • Access to court information, Image of the judiciary, Information policy, Journalism.

  • Abstract

    The article analyzes the liaison between judges and journalists as part of the information policy of the judiciary. It is shown herein that the restriction of access to judicial information, the shortcomings in the operation of the communication and information structures of the courts hinder the maintenance of the authority of justice in society. It is proved that the press service is responsible for public relations and media relations. As a result of this approach, the press services created by the courts are unable to participate efficiently in the interaction of the media and the judiciary, and the contacts between journalists and judges are minimized. The data of surveys of judges, journalists and the population of the Arkhangelsk Region are presented with the purpose to reveal if information about judicial proceedings is in demand in society and how open the judiciary is. It is shown that the majority of judges of district and city courts consider that the information on the operation of courts is in demand by society to a sufficient degree. However, at the same time, journalists face the problems of access to information, although the population considers the information on the operation of the judiciary in demand.

     

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Abrosimova EB (2001), Transparentnost pravosudiya [Transparency of Justice]. Sudebnye novosti. Obozrenie, 1-2.

      [2] Seriy VV (2011), Imidzh sudebnoi vlasti v sovremennoi Rossii [The Image of the Judiciary in Modern Russia]. Obozrevatel 8(259), 79-84.

      [3] Supataev MA (2010), Svoboda i spravedlivost v rossiiskom prave (tsivilizatsionnyi aspekt) [Freedom and Justice in the Russian Law (Civilizational Aspect)]. Gosudarstvo i pravo 4, 5-11.

      [4] Dzhanshiev GA (2008), Epokha velikikh reform [The Age of Great Reforms]. Moscow: Territoriya buduschego, 1.

      [5] Verkhovskaya AI (2010), Sredstva massovoi informatsii kak institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Mass Media as an Institution of Civil Society]. In Zhurnalistika v 2009 godu: Transformatsiya sistem SMI v sovremennom mire. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Journalism in 2009: Transformation of Media Systems in the Modern World. Collection of Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow: Department of Journalism of the Moscow State University.

      [6] Konovalov AO (2013), Problemy realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu prava na dostup k informatsii o deyatel'nosti sudov (na materialakh Novosibirskoi oblasti) [Problems of the Implementation of the Constitutional Right to Judicial Protection of the Right to Access the Information on Operation of Courts (Based on the Materials of the Novosibirsk Region)]. Voprosy sovremennoi yurisprudentsii 26, 71-79.

      [7] Bobrov DA (2014), Sostoyanie i perspektivy vzaimodeistviya organov sudebnoi vlasti so SMI pri realizatsii dostupa k informatsii o deyatelnosti sudov [The State and Prospects of Interaction of Judicial Authorities with the Media in the Implementation of Access to Information on the Activities of the Courts]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki 156(4), 189-199.

      [8] Dankova NS (2016), Reprezentatsiya sudebnoi vlasti v diskurse rossiiskikh i angliiskikh pechatnykh SMI: strategiya aktivatsiya [Representation of the Judiciary in the Discourse of Russian and English Print Media: Strategy Activation]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 16(4), 452-459.

      [9] Sidorov VA (2010), Aksiologiya zhurnalistiki informatsionnoi epokhi: ponimanie sotsialnoi missii zhurnalistiki [Axiology of Journalism of the Information Age: Understanding of the Social Mission of Journalism]. In Zhirkov GV & Sidorov VA (Eds), Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii "Tsennosti zhurnalistiki i dostoinstvo zhurnalista (aksiologiya zhurnalistiki)" [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference "Values of Journalism and the Dignity of a Journalist (Axiology of Journalism)"]. St. Petersburg.

      [10] Tretyakova OV (2008), Pravovaya zhurnalistika: Uchebnoe posobie [Legal Journalism: A Textbook]. Arkhangelsk: Pomor University.

      [11] Gritsenko EV, Babelyuk EG & Proskuryakova MI (2016), The Right of Access to Information on the Public Administration in Russia and Germany: Constitutional and Legislative Framework. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Humanities 9(9), 2202-2222.

      [12] Carlsson M (2018). Automating Judgment? Algorithmic Judgment, News Knowledge, and Journalistic Professionalism. New Media and Society 20(5), 1755-1772.

      [13] Nazaykin AN (2009), Organizatsiya media relations [Organization of Media Relations]. MediaScope 4.

      [14] Financial Times, Definition of Media Relations. http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=media-relations

      [15] Veksler AF, Svyazi s obshchestvennostyu dlya biznesa [Public Relations for Business]. Nizhny Novgorod: PR-Expert, 2001.

      [16] O kontseptsii informatsionnoi politiki sudebnoi sistemy RF: postanovlenie Soveta Sudei RF ot 16.11.2001g. No. 60 [On the Concept of Information Policy of the Judiciary of the Russian Federation: Resolution of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation No. 60].

      [17] Yuridicheskaya Rossiya. Federalnyi pravovoi portal [Legal Russia. Federal Legal Portal]. http://www.law.edu.ru/article/article.asp?articleID=1190659

      [18] Nikitinsky L, Robota Netupskogo – pod sud [Bring to Justice Robot Netupsky!]. Novaya gazeta, 8 July 2016.

      [19] The Comment of the Media Rights Center of the Faculty of Journalism of the Moscow State University, Bolshe glasnosti v rabote sudov – no nenamnogo i ne seichas. [More Publicity in the Work of the Courts – but Not Much and Not Now]. The site of the Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations. News feed, 2009. http://www.lenta.cjes.ru/?m=1&y=2009&lang=rus&nid=592

      [20] Bunkov VG (2003), Sudebnaya vlast i sredstva massovoi informatsii: problema vzaimodeistviya [Judicial Power and the Media: The Problem of Interaction]. Sudebnyi byulleten, 1.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Vladimirovna Tretyakova, O., Nikolaevna Ivanishcheva, O., Vladimirovna Gushchina, A., Vladimirovna Tretiakovich, E., & Gennadievna Piksendeeva, V. (2018). Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 569-572. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24624

    Received date: 2018-12-22

    Accepted date: 2018-12-22

    Published date: 2018-12-03