Characteristics of Monitoring of Practice-Oriented Competences of Future Educational Psychologist in Russian University

  • Authors

    • Y. V. Vardanyan
    • L. V. Vardanyan
    • N. А. Vdovina
    • N. P. Kondratyeva
    • S. V. Sergunina
    • O. V. Fadeeva
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24632
  • Assessment tool, Competence, Monitoring, Monitoring model, Subject of education, Subject of social interactions, Task.
  • Introduction. The paper rationalizes the urgency of creating a modern university monitoring model which analyses the development of practice-oriented competences of a future educational psychologist. The construction of practice-oriented competences on an interdisciplinary competence basis is fast becoming a key instrument in education. Of much importance is the strategy when the integrated organization of comprehensive monitoring procedures emerges from scientific and methodological resources. The review of modern ideas plays a pivotal role in our research. We describe the modern university monitoring model as a system of assessment and control procedures ensuring the psychic professional and personal developments of future educational psychologist. Practice-oriented competences play a critical role in future effective professional activity. The purpose of the paper is to characterize the structure and content of the practice-oriented competences of future educational psychologist, to justify and reveal the model of monitoring competences’ development with the help of the example of a Russian university.

    Materials and methods. Data were collected using the monitoring models that function in modern practices of Russian universities. The study began with the qualitative review of specific scientific literature devoted to the problem of practice-oriented competences of educational psychologist. The main method is analytical description. We rated various experiences of assessing the competences’ development describing the design of their structure and content, as well as justifying the model of their monitoring in Russian universities.

    Results. In our research we provide much suggestive evidence to substantiate the list of practice-oriented competences of future educational psychologist. Our interesting findings are the structure and the content of the competences under analysis. The most meaningful finding is a modern theoretical monitoring model which is critical for an insightful analysis of practice-oriented competences, as well as the scientific and methodological resources of its implementation in Russian universities. One of the most significant achievements to emerge from the study is the set of evaluation tools and monitoring procedures which ensures its successful approbation in one of Russian universities.

    Discussion. Multiple analysis revealed that the adequacy of assessing practice-oriented competences of the future educational psychologist emerges from a set of sufficient evaluation tools. The present study identified that the monitoring procedures allow to describe step-by-step the state of the competencies under analysis, as well as their dynamics. Overall, the study strengthens the idea of improving the monitoring system of practice-oriented competences’ development in Russian universities. The study also outlines the prospects of the monitoring system’s implementation.

    Conclusion. The following conclusions can be drawn from the present study. To prepare skilled educational psychologist with high professional qualification it is critical to develop the set of tasks to identify the list of practice-oriented competences. The structure and content of the tasks, as well as the development of assessment tools play a crucial role in a stage-by-stage application of monitoring procedures in Russian universities. The findings will be of interest for professionals who are open to innovation and development.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Zimnyaya IA (2013), Kompetentsiia i kompetentnost v kontekste kompetent-nostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii. Uchenye zapiski natsionalnogo obshchestva prikladnoi lingvistiki [Scientific notes of the National Society of Applied Linguistics] 4(4), 16-31.

      [2] Lowman RL (2012), Frontier no more: International consulting skills as necessary minimal competencies for consulting psychologists. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 64(4), 338-343.

      [3] Vardanyan YV (1998), Stroenie i razvitie professionalnoi kompetentnosti spetsialista s vysshim obrazovaniem (na materiale podgotovki pedagoga i psikhologa) [The structure and development of the professional competence of a specialist with higher education (based on the training of a teacher and a psychologist)], Dr.habil. thesis, MPGU, Moscow.

      [4] Bortnik BI, Stozhko NI & Sudakova, NP 2017. Otsenka kompetentsii: formalizatsiia i formalistika. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia [The modern problems of science and education] 4, 160.

      [5] Minin MG, Muratova EA & Mikhailova NS (2011), Fond otsenochnykh sredstv v strukture obrazovatelnykh programm. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia] 5, 112-118.

      [6] Kolegova ED (2014), O planirovanii rezultatov obucheniia v ramkakh kompetentnostno-orientirovannykh osnovnykh obrazovatelnykh programm. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific Dialogue] 2(26), 91-101.

      [7] Higgins M, Ishimaru A, Holcombe R & Fowler A (2012), Examining Organizational Learning in Schools: The Role of Psychological Safety, Experimentation, and Leadership that Reinforces Learning. Journal of Educational Change 13(1), 67-94.

      [8] Shukshina TI, Buianova IB, Gorshenina SN & Neiasova IA (2017), Pedagogicheskie usloviia praktiko-orientirovannoi podgotovki magistran-tov pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [The Review of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University] 10, 102-108.

      [9] Belova SN (2014), Problema otsenivaniia strukturnykh komponentov kachestva obrazovatelnogo protsessa v vuze. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings. Electronic scientific journal of the Kursk State University] 3(31), 164-171.

      [10] Trumbull E & Rothstein FC (2011), The Intersection of Culture and Achievement Motivation. School Community Journal, 21(2), 25-53.

      [11] Elbers E (1991), Context, culture, and competence: Answers to criticism. Educational Psychology Review 3(2), 137-148.

      [12] Kunter M, Klusmann U, Baumert J, Richter D, Voss T & Hachfeld A (2013), Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(3), 805-820.

      [13] Nandan M & London M (2013), Interdisciplinary Professional Education: Training College Students for Collaborative Social Change. Education + Training 55(8-9), 815-835.

      [14] Gallifa J & Batallé P (2010), Student Perceptions of Service Quality in a Multicampus Higher Education System in Spain. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(2), 156-170.

      [15] Vardanyan YV & Ruskina EN (2013), The Research of Coach’s Preparation to Realization of Strategies of Formation of Psychological Safety of the Subject of Sports Activity. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 14(7), 965-968.

      [16] Naumova TA & Riabova NV (2014), Proektirovanie fonda otsenochnykh sredstv v usloviiakh realizatsii kompetentnostno-orientirovannykh osnovnykh obrazovatelnykh programm professionalnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie [The Humanities and Education] 3(19), 41-46.

      [17] Vdovina SA & Kungurova IM (2013), Proektirovanie fonda otsenochnykh sredstv v usloviiakh realizatsii novykh obrazovatelnykh standartov. Chelovek i obrazovanie [Person and Education] 2(35), 108-112.

      [18] Vardanyan YV & Dergunova AV (2014), Produktivnye treningovye zadaniia kak osnova razvitiia psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti studenta. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii [In the world of scientific discoveries] 11-1(59), 585-600.

      [19] Karapetian VS & Kovalenko LV (2016), Sravnitelnyi analiz modelei formirovaniia professionalnykh pedagogicheskikh kompetentsii. Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia [The Review of Irkutsk State University. Edition: Psychology] 17, 38-46.

      [20] Bukhteeva EE & Kravets OI (2013), Metodicheskoe obespechenie monitoringa v protsesse professionalnogo obrazovaniia. Vestnik RMAT [The bulletin of the Russian International Academy of Tourism] 1(7), 78-85.

      [21] Schra G & Nietfeld J (1998), A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 90(2), 236-248.

      [22] Schraw G, Dunkle ME, Bendixen LD & Roedel TD (1995), Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology 87(3), 433-444.

      [23] Mironova MP & Burliaeva OV (2016), Nezavisimyi monitoring obrazovatelnykh rezultatov i kachestva obrazovaniia v praktike raboty pedagogicheskogo vuza. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia] 10, 101-106.

      [24] Federalnyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatelnyi standart vysshego obrazovaniia po napravleniiu podgotovki 44.03.02 Psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie uroven bakalavriata utverzhdennyi prikazom Ministerstva obrazovaniia i nauki RF ot 14 dekabria 2015 g No 1457 of the Russian Federation of 14.12.2015 Volume # 1457 [Federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of training 44.03.02 Psychological and pedagogical education (bachelorâ€s level), approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of December 14, 2015 No. 1457] fgos.ru

      [25] Federalnyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatelnyi standart vys-shego obrazovaniia po napravleniiu podgotovki 44.04.02 Psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie uroven magistratury utverzhdennyi prikazom Ministerstva obrazovaniia i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 maia 2016 g No 549 of the Russian Federation of 12.05.2016 Volume # 549. [Federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of preparation 44.04.02 Psychological and pedagogical education (master's level), approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of May 12, 2016, No. 549] fgos.ru

      [26] Prikaz Mintruda i sotsialnoi zashchity RF “Ob utverzhdenii professionalnogo standarta "Pedagog-psikholog (psikholog v sfere obrazovaniia)"" of the Russian Federation of 24.07.2015 Volume # 514n [The Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation of July 24, 2015 No 514n "On the approval of the professional standard†Educational psychologist (psychologist in the field of education)""] fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/profstandart/01.002.pdf.

      [27] Vardanyan YV & Sergunina SV (2015), Kompetentnostno-orientirovannye integrirovannye zadaniia v kontekste razvitiia professi-onalizma magistrantov. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie [The Humanities and Education] 1, 13-17.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    V. Vardanyan, Y., V. Vardanyan, L., А. Vdovina, N., P. Kondratyeva, N., V. Sergunina, S., & V. Fadeeva, O. (2018). Characteristics of Monitoring of Practice-Oriented Competences of Future Educational Psychologist in Russian University. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 607-612. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24632