Export Potential as the Competitiveness Indicator of the Agri-Food Complex

  • Authors

    • Natalia Anatolyevna Yakovenko
    • Irina Anatolyevna Rodionova
    • Irina Serafimovna Ivanenko
    • Natalia Arkadevna Kireeva
    • Antonina Mikhailovna Sukhorukova
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24640
  • Agri-Food Complex, Export Potential, Globalization, Competitiveness, Competitive Advantages,

  • The paper deals with some theoretical approaches to determining the essence of the export potential, the features of its formation and development in the agri-food complex, the impact on the growth of competitiveness. This made it possible to clarify the definition of the export potential of the agri-food complex as an aggregate of competitive advantages. The specifics of the development of the export potential in the context of globalization and the development of international integration are revealed. The dynamics and structure of exports of food products and agricultural raw materials are analyzed; the physical capacity of the domestic markets of basic food products, the dynamics, and trends of its change are estimated. Excessive growth in the volume of production of agricultural products can lead to oversaturation of the domestic market, a decrease in the profitability of domestic producers, worsening the financial situation in the industry. Russia has a significant potential for integration into the world agri-food system. However, the main share of the export of the agri-food complex is made up of agricultural raw materials, primarily grains and oilseeds, which has an adverse effect on the structure of the complex and the rate of its development. The diversification of exports, the growth of exports of products with high added value will contribute to the sustainable development of agriculture and food industries. The development of the export potential of the Russian agri-food complex should be based not only on the active use of national competitive advantages but also on the formation of competitive advantages based on the international division of labor as well. The export-oriented strategy for the development of Russia's agri-food complex needs to be justified in the context of food security policy, which implies resolving the contradiction between national interests related to the saturation of domestic markets, and attitudes toward growing competitiveness in the world food markets, as well as the development and realization of the export potential.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Porter M (1993), Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya [International Competition]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 896.

      [2] Guerson A, Parks J & Torrado M (2007), Export Structure and Growth: A Detailed Analysis for Argentina. Policy Research Working Paper, â„– 4237. Washington, DC: Word Bank.

      [3] Sachs JD & Warner AM (2001), The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45, 827-838.

      [4] Smith A (1962), Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [A Study on the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Peoples]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 684.

      [5] Ricardo D (1955), Sochineniya [Writings]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoi literatury. https://www.bibliofond.ru/view.aspx?id=122512

      [6] Porter M (2016), Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya. Konkurentnye preimushchestva stran [International Competition. Competitive Advantages of Countries]. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 947.

      [7] Tracy M (1995), Selskoe khozyaistvo i prodovolstvie v ekonomike razvitykh stran: Vvedenie v teoriyu, praktiku i politiku [Food and Agriculture in a Market Economy: Introduction to Theory, Practice, and Politics]. Saint Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 431.

      [8] Scherer FM & Ross D (1997), Struktura otraslevykh rynkov [Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance]. Moscow: Infra-M, 698.

      [9] Savenok EA & Pochernyai AS (2017), Eksportnyi potentsial promyshlennogo predpriyatiya: teoreticheskie aspekty opredeleniya [Export Potential of an Industrial Enterprise: Theoretical Aspects of the Definition]. Izvestiya Gomelskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny, 2(101), 173-176.

      [10] Revenko LS (2015), Mirovye tovarnye rynki: tendentsii XXI veka [World Commodity Markets: Trends of the 21st Century]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 5(3), 27-45.

      [11] Ksenofontov MYu, Gromova, NA & Polzikov DA (2013), Potentsial rosta agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki i osobennosti dolgosrochnoi politiki razvitiya selskogo khozyaystva [Potential for the Growth of the Agrarian Sector of the Economy and Features of the Long-Term Development Policy of Agriculture]. In V.V. Ivaneter, & M.Yu. Ksenophontov (Eds.), Perspektivy razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii: prognoz do 2030 goda. Kollektivnaya monografiya [Prospects for the Development of the Russian Economy: Forecast until 2030. Multi-Authored Monograph]. Moscow: Ankil, 408.

      [12] Rosstat. (2017). Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik. 2017: Stat. sb. [Russian Statistical Yearbook. 2017: Statistical Compilation]. Moscow, 686.

      [13] Tolkachev S & Teplyakov A (2017), Importozameshchenie v Rossii: neobkhodimost sistemno-strategicheskogo podkhoda [Import Substitution in Russia: The Need for a System-Strategic Approach]. Ekonomist, 8, 47-66.

      [14] Tolkachev SA & Teplyakov AYu (2017), Globalnyye tsepochki stoimosti i natsionalnaya promyshlennaya kompetentnost [Global Value Chains and National Industrial Competence]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 1(51), 63-81.

      [15] Faltzman V (2017), K kontseptsii ekonomicheskogo rosta Rossii: Importozameshchenie, eksportozameshchenie, umerennaya globalizatsiya [To the Concept of Russia's Economic Growth: Import Substitution, Export Substitution, Moderate Globalization]. Ekonomist, 11, 3-8.

      [16] Ricardo D (1935), Sochineniya. T.2. Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i podatnogo oblozheniya [The Works. Vol. 2: On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, 75-76.

      [17] Porter M (1993), Konkurentnye preimushchestva stran [Competitive Advantages of Nations]. http://www.seinstitute.ru/Files/Veh6-35Porter.pdf

      [18] North D (1997), Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi "Nachalo".

      [19] Wallerstein I (1974), The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the 16th Century. New York: Academic Press.

      [20] Wallerstein I (1980), The Modern World-System-II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600-1750. New York: Academic Press.

      [21] Wallerstein I (1989), The Modern World-System-III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730-1840. San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Anatolyevna Yakovenko, N., Anatolyevna Rodionova, I., Serafimovna Ivanenko, I., Arkadevna Kireeva, N., & Mikhailovna Sukhorukova, A. (2018). Export Potential as the Competitiveness Indicator of the Agri-Food Complex. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 654-658. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24640