Image-Symbols in the Tatar Poetry Between the 1920s-1930s

  • Authors

    • Nurfiya Marsovna Yusupova
    • Aygul Firdinatovna Ganieva
    • Fatima Khaliullovna Minnullina
    • Leysan Radifovna Nadyrshina
    • Ayrat Faikovich Yusupov
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24763
  • Image-Symbol, Tatar Poetry, Poetic Text, Structural-Semantic Field, Function.

  • This article reveals the functional and semantic field of image-symbols in the Tatar poetry of the 1920s-1930s as exemplified by the poetic texts of Hadi TaqtaÅŸ, Musa CÉ™lil, Hasan Tufan and Ahmed Faizi. The structural and semantic field of the image-symbols formed in the literature between the 1920s and the 1930s significantly differs from the artistic and aesthetic search of the previous periods in the development of literature. Avant-garde experiments with the form of verses of the 1920s, complex literary devices and techniques, as well as the possibility of creating an image from a large number of mosaic details led poets to folklore image-symbols. At the same time, the authors observed the diversity of ideological images that often serve as symbols and structure-forming components in the structure of a poetic text. The research aims to study folklore and ideological image-symbols in the Tatar poetry of the 1920s-1930s and to reveal their structural-semantic and functional field in poetic texts. The scientific novelty of this article is determined by a different approach to the study of the system of images in poetic works, i.e. in the course of the study, the authors focus their attention on the symbolic use of images as structure-forming components. Within the framework of this research, the authors have proved that folklore and ideological symbols act as structure-forming components and are perceived as an opportunity to change artistic paradigms, restore ideological and philosophical depth, polysemy, the possibility of double interpretation and national traditions of the Tatar poetry. The fundamental method used in the course of this study is the hermeneutic approach that guides the reader’s receptive activity to the analysis of principles and techniques for creating images and image-symbols.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Ibragimov BKh, Yusupova NM, Zakirzyanov AM (2016), Ideological myth and archetypes in the Tatar poetry of the 1920s-1950s, Journal of Language and Literature,7(3), 228-231.

      [2] Golubkov MM (1992), Utrachennye alternativy. Formirovanie monisticheskoi kontseptsii sovetskoi literatury. 1920-30 – gody [Lost alternatives. The formation of the monistic concept in the Soviet literature. 1920-1930], Nasledie, Moscow.

      [3] Kolobaeva LA (1991), Simvol kak khranitel i vozmutitel klassicheskikh traditsii (obraz Don-Zhuana v russkoi literature kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka) [Symbol as a guardian and disturber of classic traditions (the image of Don Juan in the Russian literature of the 19th and 20th centuries)], Klassika i sovremennost, Izd-vo MSU, Moscow, 207-216.

      [4] Yusupov AF (2015), Specifics of the Sufi and Islamic terminology use in the poetry of the 21st century, European Journal of Science and Theology, 11(5), 275-284.

      [5] Zagidullina DF, Yusupova NM, Yusupov ÐF (2017), Pair Sufi symbols in the Tatar poetry of the 20th century: Complexity and transformation of symbols, Xlinguae, 10(3), 75-82.

      [6] Zagidullina DF (2013), Modernizm v tatarskoi literature pervoi treti XX veka [Modernism in the Tatar literature of the first third of the 20th century], Tatar. kn. izd-vo, Kazan.

      [7] Khaybullina AA, Khabibullina AZ, Nagumanova EF (2017), Figurative in the Works of Russian Classics and Tatar Poets of the Early XX Century, Revista Publicando, 4(13), 763-772.

      [8] Ilyin IP, Tsurganova EA (1992), Terminologiya sovremennogo zarubezhnogo literaturovedeniya: strany zapadnoi Evropy i SShA [Terminology of modern foreign literature studies: countries of Western Europe and the United States], 1, Moscow: INION RAN.

      [9] Galimullina AF, Galimullin FG (2017), Spetsifika khudozhestvennogo voploshcheniya obraza sada v tvorchestve russkikh i tatarskikh poetov vtoroi poloviny XX veka [Specifics of an artistic image of a “garden†in works of Russian and Tatar poets in the second half of the 20th century], Filologiya i kultura, 3(49), 127-132.

      [10] Golubkov MM (2011), Russkaya literatura XX v.: Posle raskola [The Russian literature of the 20th century: A ground for schism], Moscow: Aspekt Press.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Marsovna Yusupova, N., Firdinatovna Ganieva, A., Khaliullovna Minnullina, F., Radifovna Nadyrshina, L., & Faikovich Yusupov, A. (2018). Image-Symbols in the Tatar Poetry Between the 1920s-1930s. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 724-726. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24763