Effect of Heat Curing Temperatures on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The geopolymer concrete (GC) is a cement replaced by aluminosilicate material combined with alkaline solution to produce strong binding property and replaced function of ordinary Portland cement. The purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between alkali solution concentrations (8 M, 10 M and 12 M), heat curing temperature and heat curing duration as the influencing parameters of concrete strengths. Geopolymer sample was prepared under different target heating temperatures which were room temperature and heat curing ranges of 60 °C to 100 °C for a duration curing period of 24 hours in the oven. Then the specimens were left in a room temperature until the testing day. The mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete were determined with the compressive test. The comparison was made with concrete control specimens that cured in ambient temperature. The results were determined from 7 days specimens after the curing process. The results show that the compressive strength of GCs under heat curing condition was developed quickly when there is an increase in temperature. It can be concluded that the temperature plays an important role in accelerating the GC strength increment compared to curing in ambient temperature.

     


  • Keywords


    curing temperature; , fly ash; geopolymer; mechanical properties; molarity.

  • References


      [1] Kong DLY & Sanjayan JG, “Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.40, No.2, (2010), pp:334-339, doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.017

      [2] Mustafa AM, Bakri A, Kamarudin H, Bnhussain M, Nizar IK., Rafiza AR. & Zarina (2011), Microstructure of different NaOH molarity of fly ash-based green polymeric cement, Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 3(2), 44-49,.

      [3] Görhan G & Kürklü G, “The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures”, Composites Part B: Engineering, 58, (2014), pp:371-377, .doi.org/10.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082

      [4] Hardjito D & Rangan BV (2014),Geopolymer concrete for environmental protection, Research report GC, (April), pp.41-59, Retrieved from: http://www.geopolymer.org/fichiers_pdf/curtin-flyash-GP-concrete-report.pdf

      [5] Hamidi RM, Man Z & Azizli KA, “Concentration of NaOH and the Effect on the Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer”, Proceedings Engineering of the Conference on Process Engineering and Advanced Materials, 148, (2016), pp:189-193, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.568

      [6] Puertas F, Martínez-Ramírez S, Alonso S & Vázquez T, “Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cements. strength behavior and hydration products. Cement and Concrete Research”, 30(10), (2000), pp:1625-1632, doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2

      [7] Kotwal AR, Kim,YJ, Hu J & Sriraman V, “Characterization and early age physical properties of ambient cured geopolymer mortar based on class c fly ash”, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(1), (2015), pp.35-43, doi:10.1007/s40069-014-0085-0

      [8] Mustafa AM, Bakri A, Kamarudin H, Bnhussain M, Nizar IK, Rafiza, AR & Zarina Y (2011), Microstructure of different NaOH molarity of fly ash- based green polymeric cement. Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 3(2), 44-49.

      [9] Palomo A, Grutzeck MW & Blanco MT (1999), Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(8), 1323-1329, doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9

      [10] Ahmed MNS, Nuruddin M, Demie S & Shafiq N (2011), Effect of curing conditions on strength of fly ash based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5(8), pp.8-22

      [11] Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ & Rangan BV (2004), On the development of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 467-472, doi:10.14359/13485

      [12] Alam S, “Utilisation of waste material in geopolymeric concrete”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol.164, CM6, (2011), pp:315-327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/coma.2011.164.6.315

      [13] Gopalakrishnan R & Chinnaraju K, “influence of silica fume on strength characteristics of fly ash alumino silicate concrete”, Proceeding of International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering, (2012), pp:165-168.

      [14] Hou Y, Wang D, Zhou W, Lu H. & Wang L (2009), Effect of activator and curing mode on fly ash-based geopolymers. Journal Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition, 24(5), 711-715, doi:10.1007/s11595-009-5711-3

      [15] Nuruddin MF, Kusbiantoro A, Qazi S, Darmawan MS & Husin NA (2011), Development of Geopolymer Concrete with Different Curing Conditions, The Journal for Technology and Scince 22(1), 24-28.

      [16] Karim MR, Hossain MM, Zain MFM, Jamil M & Lai FC (2017),Durability properties of a non-cement binder made up of pozzolans with sodium hydroxide, Construction and Building Materials, 138, 174-184

      [17] ASTM C136 (2004). Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

      [18] Jaffar MI, Badaruzzaman WHW & Baharom S (2016), Experimental tests on bending behavior of profiled steel sheeting dry board composite floor with geopolymer concrete infill. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 13, 272-295.

      [19] Ahmed MNSF, Nuruddin, M & Demie S (2011), Effect of curing conditions on strength of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5, 342-345.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 24866
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24866




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.