The Strength Index of Short and Slender Circular Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns
-
2019-01-30 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24884 -
Concentric load, high strength concrete, stress-strain, structural behaviours, ultimate strengths. -
Abstract
The factors affecting the sectional capacity, also known as strength index (SI) of concrete-filled steel tube columns (CFSTC) are, among others, type of cross-section and slenderness ratio (L/D). This study is to determine the effects of slenderness ratio of short (L/D Â 3.4) and slender (L/D Â 10) circular CFSTC on the SI. Concentric load tests were conducted to determine the ultimate strength (Nue) of ten circular sections of short and slender CFSTC with ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) and pozzolan concrete (PC) infills. The SI are determined using several design codes. Results show that the SI for short CFSTC is higher than the slender for circular section. This is because of the effect of the L/D of short and slender CFSTC circular section. It shows that the composite action between steel tube and core concrete for short is more efficient than slender circular columns. The results also show that similar compressive strength concrete (fcu) infills, either comprises of OPCC or PC do not affect the the SI values. Different design codes provide different concrete confinement safety coefficients thus the difference in the SI values. AISC (LRFD) provides the highest SI for both short and slender CFSTC. Whereas, EC4 and AS5100.6 provide the lowest SI for short and AIJ provides lowest SI for slender circular sections. The lowest calculated values of SI show the most efficient design of composite column.
Â
Â
Â
-
References
[1] ACI318-05 (2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute (ACI).
[2] EN 1994-1-1 (2004), Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings.
[3] AIJ (2001), Recommendations for design and construction of concrete-filled steel tubular structures.
[4] AISC (LRFD) (1999), Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings.
[5] BS5400 (1979), Steel, concrete and composite bridges, part 5, code of practice for design of composite bridges.
[6] AS3600 (2000). Cross-section strength of columns (Part 1: AS 3600 Design) Reinforced concrete buildings: Chapter 3 - Columns.
[7] Aslani F, Uy B & Tao Z (2015), Predicting the axial load capacity of high-strength concrete filled steel tubular columns. Steel and Composite Structures 19(4), 967-993.
[8] Han L-H, Yao G-H & Zhao X-L (2005), Tests and calculations for hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC). Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61(9), 1241-1269.
[9] Yu Q, Tao Z & Wu Y-X, (2008), Experimental behaviour of high performance concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Thin-Walled Structures 46(4), 362-370.
[10] Wang WH, Han LH, Li W & Jia YH, (2014), Behavior of concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns and beams using dune sand as part of fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials 51, 352-363.
[11] ASTME8/E8M-09 (2009). Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials.
[12] Owaid HM, Hamid R & Taha MR, (2014) Influence of thermally activated alum sludge ash on the engineering properties of multiple-blended binders concretes. Construction and Building Materials 61, 216-229.
[13] ACI211.4R-93 (1998). Guide for selecting proportions for high-strength concrete with Portland cement and fly ash.
[14] ACI211.4R-08, (2008). Guide for Selecting Proportions for High-Strength Concrete Using Portland Cement and Other Cementitious Materials.
[15] ASTMC127-88 (1988). Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate.
[16] ASTMC128-97, (1997). Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of fine aggregate.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Hana Hasnan, N., Hamid, R., & Aminah Osman, S. (2019). The Strength Index of Short and Slender Circular Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 8(1.2), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24884Received date: 2018-12-28
Accepted date: 2018-12-28
Published date: 2019-01-30