Air-Coupled Impact Echo Test with Acoustic Shield

  • Authors

    • Aina Syakira Jamil
    • Norinah Abd Rahman
    • Roszilah Hamid
    2019-01-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24885
  • Air-coupled impact-echo testing, acoustic shield, concrete flaws, nondestructive testing.
  • Abstract

    The ability of air-coupled impact-echo technique to retrieve data in a short time is the main advantage of this technique. However, there are some external factors, especially noise disruptions arising from surrounding sound where the test is performed causing some error to the data collected. Therefore, the use of acoustic shield is introduced. This paper presents the performance of air-coupled impact echo testing in detecting concrete flaws depth and effects of different acoustic shields on the estimated flaws depth. Testing is performed on concrete slab designed to have four defects at different depth and size. Acoustic shield are made from egg crate foam, aluminium sheet, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe and polypropylene (PP) plastic. Recorded data in time domain is transformed to frequency spectrum by fast Fourier transform (FFT) to obtain the peak frequency for each defect zone. Estimated depth error obtained without acoustic shield is 10.0%. The value was higher compared to the use of acoustic shield from egg crate foam, aluminium sheet, PVC pipe and PP plastic with 3.3%, 3.3%, 8.3% and 3.3% error respectively. Data analysis shows that the use of acoustic shield has reducing the effects of noise and other acoustic waves measured by error percentage. The use of egg crate foam as an acoustic shield is the most effective shield followed by aluminium sheet, PP plastic and PVC pipes.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Y Lin, M Sansalone, NJ Carino (1990), Finite element studies of the impact-echo response of plates containing thin layers and voids. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 9,27–47.

      [2] Carino NJ, Sansalone M (1998), Impact-Echo Method. Concrete International, 10, 1–8.

      [3] Cheng CC, Sansalone M (1995), Determining the minimum crack width that can be detected using the impact-echo method Part 2. Numerical fracture analyses, Materials and Structures, 28, 125–132.

      [4] Hong, SU, Kim SH, Lee YT (2016), Estimation of the thickness of recycled course aggregate concrete hollow column with impact- echo method. Material Research Innovation, 666-670.

      [5] Abraham O, Popovics JS (2010), Non-destructive evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Non-Destructive Testing Methods. Elsevier Inc., 466-489.

      [6] Mutlib NK, Baharom S, Elâ€Shafie A, Nuawi MZ (2016), Ultrasonic surface wave monitoring for steel fibre-reinforced concrete using gel-coupled piezoceramic sensors: A case study. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 41, 1273-1281.

      [7] Zhu J & Popovics JS (2007), Imaging concrete structures using air-coupled impact-echo. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 133, 628–640.

      [8] Shin SW & Popovics JS (2012), T. Oh, Cost effective air-coupled impact-echo sensing for rapid detection of delamination damage in concrete structures. Advance in Structural Engineering 15, 887–895.

      [9] ACI Committee Reports, Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of Concrete in Structures, (1998) 62.

      [10] Cheng C & Sansalone M (1993), The impact-echo response of concrete plates containing delaminations: numerical, experimental and field studies. Materials and Structures, 26, 274–285.

      [11] Sansalone M & Carino N (1989), Detecting delaminations in concrete slabs with and without overlays using the impact-echo method. ACI Materials Journal, 86, 175-184.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Syakira Jamil, A., Abd Rahman, N., & Hamid, R. (2019). Air-Coupled Impact Echo Test with Acoustic Shield. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 8(1.2), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24885

    Received date: 2018-12-28

    Accepted date: 2018-12-28

    Published date: 2019-01-30