The Difference in the Learning Achevement in Civic Education by Using Blended Learning Models

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The aim of this research wasto see the differences of the usage of model blended learning towards the learning achievement in civic education in students of the Faculty of education science education North Sumatera Islamic University.The sample of this research was conducted on a Mathematical Education Study Program numbered 20 people and Biology Education Study Program numbered 18 people carried out on in the teachings of the 2017/2018. Hypothesis testing is done using analysis of variance (Anava) one way at 0.05 significance level by using the SPSS program 24.0 for Windows. Test the hypothesis on this research used independent T test. Based on the results of the Testing is significant value of 0.032.Next, the value of significant 0.032 < 0.05H0 is rejected and then accepted the H1 so that Ir can be concluded that there is a difference in learning achievement in Civic Education on student of Mathematic Education Study Program and Biology Education Study Program.

     

     

  • Keywords


    Blended Learning, Civic Education Courses

  • References


      [1] P. Levine and K. K. Ginsberg, “The Republic is (Still) at Risk-and Civics is Part of the Solution,” 2017.

      [2] Q. Alam, “Impact of the School Outreach Tour Program of Citizens Archive of Pakistan on Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 289–306, 2017.

      [3] D. Sampermans, M. M. Isac, and E. Claes, “Can Schools Engage Students? Multiple Perspectives, Multidimensional School Climate Research in England and Ireland,” JSSE - J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–28, Mar. 2018.

      [4] X. Kuang, K. J. Kennedy, and M. M. C. MOK, “Creating Democratic Class Rooms in Asian Contexts: The Influences of Individual and School Level Factors on Open Classroom Climate,” JSSE - J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29–40, Mar. 2018.

      [5] I. B. Oselumese, I. B. Oselumese, D. Omoike, and O. Andrew, “Environmental Influence On Students’ Academic Performance In Secondary School,” Int. J. Fundam. Psychol. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10–14, Mar. 2016.

      [6] M. Z. Hamdan, “A MULTIPHASIC BLENDED CITIZENSHIP ACCULTURATION PROGRAM FOR BUILDING DIVERSE CITIZENS IN HOSTILE POLITICAL TIMES AND CONTEMPORARY ICT - GLOBAL AGE,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., 2017.

      [7] A. T. Sigauke, “Citizenship Education in the Social Science Subjects: An Analysis of the Teacher Education Curriculum for secondary schools,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 38, no. 11, Nov. 2013.

      [8] S. Thomas, “Future Ready Learning: Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. 2016 National Education Technology Plan.,” Off. Educ. Technol. US Dep. Educ., Jan. 2016.

      [9] V. T. Irawan, E. Sutadji, and Widiyanti, “Blended learning based on schoology: Effort of improvement learning outcome and practicum chance in vocational high school,” Cogent Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2017.

      [10] S. Wichadee, “A Development of the Blended Learning Model Using Edmodo for Maximizing Students’ Oral Proficiency and Motivation,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 12, no. 02, pp. 137–154, Feb. 2017.

      [11] E. S. Yunkul, “Students’ Attitudes towards Edmodo, a Social Learning Network: A Scale Development Study.,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 16–29, Apr. 2017.

      [12] V. A. Nguyen, “The Impact of Online Learning Activities on Student Learning Outcome in Blended Learning Course,” J. Inf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 16, no. 04, p. 1750040, Dec. 2017.

      [13] B. S. (Benjamin S. Bloom, G. F. Madaus, and J. T. (John T. Hastings, Evaluation to improve learning. McGraw-Hill, 1981.

      [14] C. M. Holmes and C. Reid, “A Comparison Study of On-campus and Online Learning Outcomes for a Research Methods Course A Comparison Study of On-campus and Online Learning Outcomes for a,” J. Couns. Prep. Superv., vol. 9, no. 2, 2017.

      [15] R. Luckin and W. Holmes, Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson.

      [16] O. Akınoğlu and Y. Karsantık, “Pre-Service Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 61–76, 2016.

      [17] E. Abdel Meguid and M. Collins, “Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. Volume 8, pp. 229–241, Mar. 2017.

      [18] R. H. Ristanto, S. Zubaidah, M. Amin, and F. Rohman, “The Potential of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition in Biology Learning at Higher Education,” Int ernational J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2018.

      [19] X. Carbonell, A. Chamarro, U. Oberst, B. Rodrigo, and M. Prades, “Problematic Use of the Internet and Smartphones in University Students: 2006–2017,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 475, Mar. 2018.

      [20] H. Tripathi, “Effectiveness of Blended Learning Using LMS-Edmodo in Teaching Economics at Higher Secondary Level,” Int. J. Indian Psychol., vol. 3, no. 3, 2016.

      [21] R. P. N. Puji and N. Umamah, “Edmodo Multimedia: Supporting Technology for Media Learning at Higher Education,” Int. J. English Lit. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 25255
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.25255




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.