The Mediating Roles of Block Chain Technology Practices on Green Supplier Development Process Towards Sustainability Performance: Indonesia Green Industry Level IV
-
2018-12-13 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.34.25303 -
Green Supplier Development, Block Chain Technology, Sustainability Performance. -
Abstract
Implementation of block chain technology has many benefits for some green industries, but there are also cautionary to implementation can be sustained continuously. This paper seeks to advance research development related to green supply chain and block chain technology especially regarding green supplier development process. The purpose of this research is the block chain practices can improve and affect sustainability performance on the green supplier development process. Researchers took 48’s of green industry level IV in Indonesia use their approach and analyzed hypothesis in statistically. The results of this study stated have significant impact of block chain practices can be variable to improve sustainability performance on the green supplier development process. This framework can be the basis for the suggestion Green Industry Level IV in maintaining sustainability performance in Indonesia.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] Bergendahl, J.A., Sarkis, J., Timko, M.T. Transdisciplinarity and the food energy and water nexus: Ecological modernization and supply chain sustainability perspectives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2018, 133, 309–319.
[2] Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q. Environmental sustainability and production: Taking the road less travelled. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2018, 56, 743–759.
[3] Swan, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media Inc., 2015.
[4] Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M., Sarkis, J. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking, 2005, 12, 330–353.
[5] Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System. 2008, https://www.academia.edu/download/32413652/BitCoin_P2P_electronic_cash_system.pdf.
[6] Bitcoin Project 2009-2018. https://bitcoin.org/.
[7] Burger, C., Kuhlmann, A., Richard, P., Weinmann, J. Blockchain in the Energy Transition: A Survey among Decision-Makers in the German Energy Industry. DENA German Energy Agency, 2016.
[8] Spielman, A. Blockchain: Digitally Rebuilding the Real Estate Industry. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016.
[9] Veuger, J. Attention to Disruption and Blockchain Creates A Viable Real Estate Economy. J. US-China Public Adm., 2017, 14, 263–285.
[10] Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., Janssen, M. Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Gov. Inf. Q., 2017, 34, 355–364.
[11] Mettler, M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, 2016, pp. 1-3.
[12] Mengelkamp, E., Notheisen, B., Beer, C., Dauer, D., Weinhardt, C. A blockchain-based smart grid: Towards sustainable local energy markets. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev., 2018, 33, 207–214.
[13] Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., Wang, H. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 2017, pp. 557-564.
[14] Sulkowski, A.J. Blockchain, Law, and Business Supply Chains: The Need for Governance and Legal. 2018, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205452.
Olabutiyi, M.E. A User’s Guide to Path Analysis. University Press of America, 2006
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Hutomo, A., Haizam Mohd Saudi, M., Masri, R., Sentosa, I., & Sinaga, O. (2018). The Mediating Roles of Block Chain Technology Practices on Green Supplier Development Process Towards Sustainability Performance: Indonesia Green Industry Level IV. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.34), 314-317. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.34.25303Received date: 2019-01-03
Accepted date: 2019-01-03
Published date: 2018-12-13