Comparison on Difference in Conventional Electronic Device and IoT (Internet of Things) Enabled Sensors Readings of Vital Signs in Patients

  • Authors

    • Yeole Anjali
    • Kalbande D.R
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.25388
  • vital signs, conventional readings, IoT enable sensors

  • Abstract

     

    The comparative study was carried out on difference in reading of conventional bedside monitor and IoT (Internet of Things) enabled sensors recordings of vital signs like temperature, heart rate and spo2 in patients of PKC hospital, Vashi. The study was conducted on selected 10 patients. For each subject conventional device and IoT sensors readings of temperature, heart rate and spo2 were recorded for 5 minutes for 3 days. Readings from conventional devices and IoT sensors were recorded simultaneously. Data included readings of temperature, Spo2 and heart rate. Total samples collected are minimum 324 and maximum 330.Clinically approved results are present in the paper. The recordings were compared to know difference between conventional device readings and IoT enabled sensors reading. The study findings discovered that there is no momentous difference between the conventional device readings and IoT based sensors readings.

     

  • References

    1. [1] http://www.surgeryencyclopedia.com/St-Wr/Vital-Signs.html

      [2] Adelaide, S. Aust, Best practices evidences based practice information sheet for health professionals,

      Australian nursing journal: ANJ, 1329-1874

      [3] Barro, S., Presedo, J., Félix, P. et al. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes (2002) 10: 291. https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210050-00003

      [4] Cardona-Morrell, M., et al. "Vital signs monitoring and nurse–patient interaction: A qualitative observational study of hospital practice." International journal of nursing studies 56 (2016): 9-16.

      [5] https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/bedside-monitor-6176902612.html

      [6] Medical buyer’s guide MedTech, care http://www.medicalbuyer.co.in/index.php/buyers-guide/buyers-guide-medtech/4542-bg-patient-monitoring-equipment

      [7] Antonio J. Jara, Miguel A. Zamora and Antonio F. G. Skarmeta,†An architecture based on Internet of Things to support mobility and security in medical environmentsâ€, IEEE CCNC 2010

      [8] An Intelligent Real Time IoT Based System.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319161021_An_Intelligent_Real_Time_IoT_Based_System_IRTBS_for_Monitoring_ICU_Patient [accessed Apr 29 2018].

      [9] Yeole Anjali, Kalbande D. R, Volume: VIII, Issue : IV, April – 2018,Use of Internet of Things( IoT) in Indian Healthcare from Doctor‘s point of view.

      [10] http://www.minitab.com/en-us/

      [11] Henry Hsu ,Peter A. Lachenbruch, Paired t Test, Wiely StatsRef,ISBN: 9781118445112| DOI: 10.1002 /9781118445112

      [12] Imani R. Salehi, HabibianR, Sadeghi B, Hatamipour K. Comparative study of Measuring Body Temperature by Mercury and Digital Thermometer IJN 2009;21(56):9-16

      [13] Evans D,Hodgkinson B,Berry J. Vital signs. The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery [online]. 1999[cited on 2011]: 8-9 available from URL http://www.lesionadomedular.com/archivos/almacen/signos%vitales.pdf

      [14] Banuchandar J, S Deepa N Tamilarasi, and J Parkavi.,Eye for the visually impaired." International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 2(2) :368-372

      [15] Bayne GC. Vital signs: Are we monitoring the right parameters? Nursing Management 1997 May ; 28(5):74-6

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Anjali, Y., & D.R, K. (2018). Comparison on Difference in Conventional Electronic Device and IoT (Internet of Things) Enabled Sensors Readings of Vital Signs in Patients. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 563-567. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.25388

    Received date: 2019-01-04

    Accepted date: 2019-01-04

    Published date: 2018-11-30