Possible Effects of IR4.0 on Malaysia’s TN50

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Malaysia’s development since 1970 has been guided by well formulated national development blueprints starting with the New Economic Policy followed by the National Vision Plan. The next stage of Malaysia’s development will span year 2021-2050 and shall be charted by TN50. The latest blueprint is currently being formulated using the bottom-up approach. The period for TN50 is also the era of IR4.0 where disruptive technologies are driving major changes in business models and sustainability. Malaysia will be strongly affected by these changes. Malaysia has done well so far based on production factors tied to low cost of labour and high level of incentive and subsidies. The next level of Malaysia’s development journey requires higher level factors that are tied to competitive advantages such innovation, entrepreneurships, speed and integrity.  These factors are required to ensure continuous presence of manufacturing and trade activities in Malaysia and allow Malaysia to benefits from developments related to IR4.0.

     


  • Keywords


    Malaysia; IR4.0; TN50 disruptive; technologies

  • References


      [1] Lee H A. Malaysia’s Transformasi Nasional 2050 brings bold new style, but to what end?. Perspective, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 31, 2017, 1-7.

      [2] Nordin M R. The challenge for higher education in Malaysia in an era of knowledge-based economy, in D. N. Abdulai (Editor), Malaysia and the k-economy, Pelanduk Publication, Malaysia, 2001, pp. 1-29.

      [3] Porter M E. The Competetive Advantage of Nations. The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1990.

      [4] Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Random House, UK, 2017

      [5] World GDP Ranking 2017, knoemena, accessed on 17/3/2018; https://knoema.com/nwnfkne/world-gdp-ranking-2017-gdp-by-country-data-and-charts

      [6] The World in 2050,February 2017, www.pwc.com

      [7] HSBC Global Research, The World in 2050, Global Economics, January 2012.

      [8] Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. World Economic Forum, 2017.

      [9] The World Banks Group. Doing Business 2017. 14th Edition, 2017.

      [10]IMD World Digital Competitveness Ranking 2017. IMD World Competitveness Center.

      [11]Lanvin B. and Evans P. (Editors). The Global Talent Competitveness Index 2017: Talent and Technology. INSEAD, 2016.

      [12]The Global Human Capital Report 2017. World Economic Forum, 2017.

      [13]Global Youth Development Index and Report 2016. Commonwealth Secretariat.

      [14]Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2017). The Global Innovation Feeding the World. Ithaca, Fontainbleau and Geneva.

      [15]J. Helliwell, R. Layard and J. Sachs (2017). World Happiness Report 2017, New York: Sustainable Development Solutioms Network.

      [16]M.E. Porter, S. Stern and M. Green. Social Index 2017. Washington, Social Progress Imperative, 2017.

      [17]Z.J. Acs, L. Szerb, E. Aution and A. Lloyd. The Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, Washington, D.C.

      [18]Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2017. Global Scores.

      [19]A. Jasmon and M.R. Nordin. Key trends in south east asia. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, September/October 2003, pp. 11-16.

      [20]M.R. Nordin. Get set for next industrial revolution, The STARonline, 7 August 2017.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 25717
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.42.25717




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.