Enhancing Business Continuous Improvement Using TCI Model

Authors

  • Mohamad Fazali Ghazali
  • Rohaizah Saad.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.7.25982

Published:

2019-01-18

Keywords:

Continuous Improvement, Innovative Creative Circle, TRIZ, Automotive.

Abstract

Since the current world global economy has become competitive, most of the manufacturing industries are trying to improve productivity by adopting technology and spur the innovation such as quality improvement tools and technique. The most effective way to improve productivity is by establishing an Innovative Creative Circle as a problem-solving team to enhance manufacturing processes by reducing waste, and improving customer needs and quality of the product or services. By integrating Innovative Creative Circle with appropriate problem solving tools such as TRIZ methodology, the company is able to eliminate most of the unnecessary cost that will affect the operation cost, the products and the processes of the organizations. This paper provides a case study of an activity of TCI Model as part of continuous improvement tools and creatively solve daily problems including impossible-to-solve problems. TCI Model has succeeded in improving the quality of products or services with a lower cost operation. Hence, this has given a competitive advantage over other businesses.

 

References

[1] Azlan, A., Ariz, B., & Yusof, K. (2014). Perceptions on TRIZ by Current TRIZ Experts in the Industry: A review in Malaysia. 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, 325–331. http://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.71

[2] Bakar, N. A., & Rahim, Z. A. (2014). Design-To-Cost Framework in Product Design Using Inventive Problem Solving Technique (TRIZ). Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 5(52), 3–17.

[3] Brad, S. (2008). Vectors of innovation to support quality initiatives in the framework of ISO 9001:2000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(7), 674–693. http://doi.org/10.1108/02656710810890872.

[4] Fryer, K. J., Antony, J., & Douglas, A. (2007). Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector: A literature review and some key findings. The TQM Magazine, 19(5), 497–517.

[5] Fryer, K., Ogden, S., Anthony, J., Fryer, K., & Ogden, S. (2013). Bessant ’ s continuous improvement model : revisiting and revising. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(6), 41 – 494. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2012-0052

[6] Hyun Woong Jin, T. L. D. (2014). A comparison of Korean and US continuous improvement projects. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(4), 384 – 405.

[7] Ikovenko, S., & Bradley, J. (2004). TRIZ as a Lean Thinking Tool. ETRIA TRIZ Future Conference 2004, 7526–7528.

[8] Jagdeep Singh, H. S. (2012). Continuous improvement approach: state-of-art review and future implications. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 88 – 111.

[9] Jagdeep Singh, H. S. (2015). Continuous improvement philosophy – literature review and directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(1), 75 – 119.

[10] Jani, H. M. (2013). An Overview of TRIZ Problem-Solving Methodology and its Applications. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 13(2), 83–92. http://doi.org/10.9790/0661-1328392

[11] Jiannan, Z., & Dongmei, Y. (2010). A TRIZ-based process model for technology evolutionary potential forecast. 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, CAID and CD’2010, 1, 458–462. http://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDCD.2010.5681309

[12] Kim, S., Mabin, V. J., & Davies, J. (2008). The theory of constraints thinking processes: retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(2), 155–184. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570810846883

[13] Laura Costa Maia, Anabela Carvalho Alves, C. P. L. (2012). How could the TRIZ tool help continuous improvement efforts of the companies ? Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, 1–10.

[14] Mostafa Jafari, Peyman Akhavan, Hamid Reza Zarghami, N. A., & Article. (2006). Exploring the effectiveness of inventive principles of TRIZ on developing researchers’ innovative capabilities: A case study in an innovative research center. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(5), 747–767. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564230910978511

[15] Nahavandi, N., Parsaei, Z., & Montazeri, M. (2011). Integrated framework for using TRIZ and TOC together: a case study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(4), 309. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2011.041053

[16] Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D., & Pipan, K. (2010). Quality improvement methodologies–PDCA cycle, RADAR matrix, DMAIC and DFSS. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 43(1), 476–483.

[17] Tzong-Ru (Jiun-Shen) Lee, Min-Chih Hsu, Anieszka M. Dadura, K. G. (2006). TRIZ application in marketing model to solve operational problems for Taiwanese aquatic products with food traceability systems. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(5), 625–646. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564230910978511

[18] Zhang, T., Hui, X., Jiang, P., & Zhang, H. (2010). A method of technology roadmapping based on TRIZ. 5th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT2010, 51–54. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2010.5492841

[19] Zouaoua, D., Crubleau, P., Mathieu, J. P., Thiéblemont, R., & Richir, S. (2010). TRIZ and the difficulties in marketing management applications. PICMET ’10 - Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings - Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 807–816. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78549281447&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

View Full Article: