Using Waste Asphalt Concrete (WAC) for Improving Poorly sandy Graded (PSG) Subgrade Soil
-
2018-11-28 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26245 -
CBR, direct shear, PSG, river sandy soil, waste asphalt concrete (WAC) -
Abstract
Waste asphalt concrete (WAC) is one of main current sustainable problems facing accumulation in high quantities as a result of the highways failure, maintenance and reconstructions. On the other hand, presence of large amounts of poorly sand graded (PSG) soil near rivers, which are not suitable in case of using it as subgrade soil. So, present research focusing on study the effect of adding WAC on the properties of PSG soil. Modified Procter test, California Bearing Ratio test (CBR), Direct Shear test were depend on evaluating the stabilized soil properties (i.e. dry density, optimum water content, CBR, and direct shear). PSG river soil used as subgrade soil in this research brought from sides of Sadit AL- Handayi in Babylon Governorate located in middle west of Iraq, about 60 km south west of Baghdad, capital of Iraq. Percent of adding are (12, 24, 36, and 48)% by weight. Results showed that the adding of WAC increase the dry density in different rate. While the optimum water content decrease with increasing WAC added. Direct shear of stabilized soil increase while angle of internal friction decrease with increasing of added WAC. CBR values increase with increasing WAC added.
Â
 -
References
[1] AL-Beiruty H. Mohammed , (2012)" Effect of Natural Sand on The Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixes", , M.Sc. thesis, civil engineering, University of Baghdad.
[2] American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials, D.C (1993) (AASHTO): AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, Washington.
[3] ASTM D 1557-12,(2012), "Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort" ,West Conshocken, PA.
[4] ASTM D 2487– 06 (2000), “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)†United States.
[5] ASTM D 2487– 06 (2000), “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)†United States.
[6] ASTM D 698,(2012), "Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort". ,West Conshocken, PA.
[7] ASTM D2216-10 (2010),"Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass", ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[8] ASTM D3080/ D3080M-11 (2011), " Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions", ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[9] ASTM D421-85(2007), "Standard Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size Analysis and Determination of Soil Constants (Withdrawn 2016), ASTM International", West Conshohocken, PA.
[10] ASTM D4318-17 (2017). "Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils", ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[11] ASTM-D1883-07(2007). "Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils", West Conshocken, PA.
[12] Bryson S. and H. El Naggar .,(2013). "Evaluation of the efficiency of different ground improvement techniques," in proceeding of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris.
[13] Das Braja .M., (1983). " principles of foundation engineering" Thomson.
[14] Potturi. AJAY K (2006). "Evaluation of Resilient Modulus of cement and cement-fiber treated reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Aggregates using repeated load triaxial test", Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Pa, rtial Fulfillment of the Requirements MASTER OF Science in Civil Engineering , University of Texas At Arlington.
[15] S.C.R.B., (2009), State Commission of Roads and Bridges (SCRB/R6), (2009), "General Specification for Roads and Bridges ", Republic of Iraq, Ministry of Housing and Construction, Department of Planning and Studies, Baghdad, Revised Edition ,Addendum No.3.,
[16] Shubber, Khawla H. H. (2016). "Comparison between Effect of Adding Asphalt Emulsion and Portland Cement on Engineering Properties of Sand River Subgrade Soil", Volume 3 issue 2 of "International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineeringâ€., Institute of Research Engineers and Doctors - IRED, USA. 2016, DOI: 10.15224/ 978-1-63248-093-4-19.
[17] Varaskin J., S., Klotz, U. and Mengé, P. Chu.,(2009). "Construction processes," in 17th International Conference on Soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Amsterdam, pp. 3006-3135.
[18] Wen, Haifang., Warner, Justin., Edil, Tuncer and Wang, Gingan (2010)."Laboratory Comparison of Crushed Aggregate and Recycled Pavement" Material With and Without High Carbon Fly Ash" Geotech Geol Eng, 28:405–411 DOI 10.1007/s10706-009-9300-1.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Khawla H. H. Shubber, A. P. D., & Ali S. M. Alkizwini, E. (2018). Using Waste Asphalt Concrete (WAC) for Improving Poorly sandy Graded (PSG) Subgrade Soil. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.20), 472-476. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26245