Numerical Evaluation of Seismic Response of Asymmetrical Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

  • Authors

    • Mohammed J. Hamood
    • Layla A. Ghalib
    • Ameer G. Abdalwahab
    2018-11-28
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26249
  • seismic response, asymmetrical frame buildings, finite element analysis, ABAQUS.

  • Abstract

    Asymmetrical multi-storey buildings are almost unavoidable in modern structures due to various types of useful and architectural requirements. Latest earthquakes showed that irregular distribution of mass, stiffness and strength cause serious damage in building structural systems. This paper investigates the numerical simulation of buildings with plan irregularity and presents a case study to demonstrate the numerical evaluation of the seismic response of a three real plan-asymmetric reinforced concrete building tested at full scale at the European Laboratory for Structural Assessment of the Joint Research Center, Ispra / Italy within the SPEAR project. The structural evaluation performed through a validated Finite Elements Package, modeled by the general purpose ABAQUS, which is able to run accurate analysis, in particular nonlinear static and dynamic analysis considering both geometric nonlinearity and material inelasticity.

    Adequacy of the numerical modeling is verified by comparing numerical and experimental results through evaluation of the seismic capacity and dynamic characteristics of the building. The provisions of the adopted seismic code for designing such buildings are also checked over and done with the nonlinear static and dynamic analysis by verifying the proficiency of an analytical model for simulating the nonlinear response of structures considered to conduct an investigation into experiments.

     

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Magliulo G., Maddaloni G. and Petrone C., “Influence of earthquake direction on the seismic response of irregular plan RC frame buildingsâ€, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol.13, Issue 2, (2014), pp:243–256, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11803-014-0227-z

      [2] CEN (2004), Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1, General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998-1, Brussels, Belgium.

      [3] Aval S. B. B., Asayesh M. J., “Seismic performance evaluation of asymmetric reinforced concrete tunnel form buildings†The Institution of Structural Engineers, Volume 10, (2017), Pages 157–169, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012417300176

      [4] Jeong S. H., Elnashai A. S., “Analytical Assessment of an Irregular RC Full Scale 3D Test Structureâ€, research is supported by the Mid-America Earthquake Center under National Science Foundation Grant EEC-9701785, (2004), pp:141.

      [5] Fardis M.N., “Design of an Irregular Building for the SPEAR Project-Description of the 3-Storey Structureâ€, Research Report, (2002), University of Patras, Greece.

      [6] Mander J.B., Priestley M.J.N. and Park R., “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concreteâ€, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 114, Issue 8, (1988), pp. 1804-1826. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9445%281988%29114%3A8%281804%29

      [7] Takanashi K., Udagawa K. and Tanaka H., "A simulation of earthquake response of steel buildings," Proc. of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, Vol. 3, (1977), pp:3156-3162.

      [8] Takanashi K., Udagavw K. and Tanaka H., "Pseudo-dynamic tests on a 2-storey steel frame by computer-load test apparatus hybrid system," Proc. of the 7th World conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, Vol. 7, (1980), pp:225-232.

      [9] Mahin S.A., Shing P.B., "Pseudo-dynamic method for seismic testing", ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 111, Issue 7, (1985), pp: 1482-1503. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9445%281985%29111%3A7%281482%29

      [10] Negro P., Pinto A.V., Verzeletti G. and Magonette G.E., "PsD test on four-story R/C building designed according to Eurocodes", ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 122, Issue 12, (1996), pp: 1409-1417, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9445%281996%29122%3A12%281409%29

      [11] Molina F.J., Verzeletti G., Magonette G., Buchet Ph. and Geradin M., "Bi-directional pseudodynamic test of a full-size three-storey building", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, Issue 12, (1999), pp: 1541-1566, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291096-9845%28199912%2928%3A12%3C1541%3A%3AAID-EQE880%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R

      [12] Abaqus/CAE 6.12-1 Analysis User's Manual 2012. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    J. Hamood, M., A. Ghalib, L., & G. Abdalwahab, A. (2018). Numerical Evaluation of Seismic Response of Asymmetrical Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.20), 491-495. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26249

    Received date: 2019-01-20

    Accepted date: 2019-01-20

    Published date: 2018-11-28