Influence of Percentage Replacement of Metakaolin on Different Concrete Types Exposed to Internal Sulphate Attack

  • Authors

    • Hadeel K. Awad
    • Rawaa K. Aboud
    • Shatha D. Mohammed
    2018-11-28
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26253
  • High performance concrete, internal sulphate attack, metakaolin, reactive powder concrete and self-compacted concrete.

  • Abstract

    This research presents an experimental investigation on the influence of metakaolin replacement percentage upon some properties of       different concrete types. Three types of concrete were adopted (self- compacted concrete, high performance concrete and reactive powder concrete) all of high sulphate (SO3) percentage from the fine aggregate weight, 0.75%.

    Three percentages of metakaolin replacement were selected to be studied (5, 7 and 10) %. Three types of concrete properties (compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength) were adopted to achieve better understanding for the influence of adding metakaolin..

     The output results indicated that the percentage of metakaolin had a different level of positive effect on the compressive strength for both including and excluding of internal sulphate attack. This effect reached at 28 days of curing to (11.86, 10.22 and 4.75) % in case of excluding sulphate attack and to (13.82, 11.47and 6.53) % in the other case for SCC, HPC and RPC respectively. It can be concluded that the effect of metakaolin in both SCC and HPC are more influence than in RPC. Splitting and flexural strength have showed a similar behavior, flexural strength increased by (15.38, 9.42 and 5,84) % at age of 28 days when the sulphate attack is excluded, while it was (14.02, 10.66 and 4.28)% in case of sulphate attack included for SCC,HPC and RPC respectively. The response of splitting tensile strength for both including and excluding of sulphate attack reached to (13.03, 12.95 and 9.17) % and (16.88, 10.33 and 6.74) % respectively for SCC, HPC and RPC.

     

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Ihab S., “Effect of External and Internal Sulphate on Compressive Strength of Concreteâ€, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 12, No. 20, (2017), pp. 10324-10333. https://www.ripublication.com /ijaer17/ ijaerv12n20_ 154.pdf

      [2] Nada M. and Samaa A., “The Effect of Cement and Admixture Types on the Resistance of High Performance Concrete to Internal Sulphate Attackâ€, Journal of Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 2, (2016), pp. 75-92. https://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=107665

      [3] Tariq S., Alaa M. and Abid H.,†Behavior of High Performance Concrete Exposed to Internal Sulphate Attack (Gypsum-Contaminated Aggregate)â€,10th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments and Second NASA/ARO/ASCE Workshop on Granular Materials in Lunar and Martian Exploration, (2006).

      [4] Anusiya M., Oviya S., “Comparative Study on Reactive PowderConcrete with High Strength Concrete â€,International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 10, (2017), pp. 19868-19875. https://www.ijirset.com/upload/2017/october/125_IJIRSET%20paper%20_32_.pdf

      [5] Esam M., “Internal Sulphate Attack on Self Compacting Concreteâ€, Journal of Babylon University/Engineering Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 5, (2013), pp. 1622-1631. http://www.uobabylon.edu.iq/publications/applied_edition21/paper_ed21_13.doc

      [6] Hadeel K., “Influence of Internal Sulphate Attack on Some Properties of Self Compacted Concreteâ€, Journal of Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 5, (2017), pp. 27-46. https://www.iasj.net/iasj? func= fulltext & aId=124414

      [7] IQS 5-84, Iraq standard specification for Portland Cement.

      [8] ASTM C150-07, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [9] IQS 45-84, Aggregate from natural sources for concrete and building construction.

      [10] ASTM C33-03, “Standard Specifications for Concrete Aggregate", American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [11] ASTM C618-08, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [12] ASTM C1240-03, “Standard Specification for Use of Silica Fume as a Mineral Admixture in Hydraulic Cement Concrete, Mortar, and Grout. American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [13] ASTM C494/C494M – 05, “Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concreteâ€, American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [14] ACI Committee 211.4R, 1993, Guide for Selecting Proportions for High Strength Concrete with Portland Cement and Fly Ash.

      [15] EFNARC, 2005, Specification and Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete, pp.32, www.efranice.org

      [16] ASTM C143-00, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic Cement Concreteâ€. American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [17] B.S.1881: part 116,"Methods for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes", British Standard Institution, 1983.

      [18] ASTM C293-06,"Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Center- Point Loading)", American Society for Testing and Materials.

      [19] ASTM C496-/C496M-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength for Cylindrical Concrete Specimensâ€, American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    K. Awad, H., K. Aboud, R., & D. Mohammed, S. (2018). Influence of Percentage Replacement of Metakaolin on Different Concrete Types Exposed to Internal Sulphate Attack. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.20), 514-519. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.20.26253

    Received date: 2019-01-20

    Accepted date: 2019-01-20

    Published date: 2018-11-28