Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) for Route Selection of Transmission Tower

  • Authors

    • M. S. Zulkarnain
    • R. C. Omar
    • I. N.Z. Baharuddin
    • R. Roslan
    • S. A. Kamarudin
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.26281
  • Environmental, Intelligent, Landslide, Sensitive, Transmission.

  • Transmission route selection needs to determine in order to have the best route for the transmission line. This paper presents a few alternative transmission line routes together by using cost path analysis application, minimizing and avoiding propose new located tower in landslide hazard area. The conventional route planning method usually only take into considerations of topographical such as gradient and curvature. This method unable to sustain the environment. This study can take into consideration of many factors that related to Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) such as prone to landslide area, forestry area, land cover and land use. Different influence factor that assign to the weightage will resulted to different output of the suitability map. This study will have used nine Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) factors, and using three difference influence factors that will optimize the result of the suitability map.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Van Westen, C.J.; Rengers, N.; Soeters, R. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat. Hazard. 2003, 30, 399–419.

      [2] Ayalew, L.; Yamagishi, H.; Maruib, H.; Takami, K. Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng. Geol. 2005, 81, 432–445.

      [3] Thiery, Y.; Malet, J.-P.; Sterlacchini, S.; Puissant, A.; Maquaire, O. Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: Application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphology 2007, 92, 38–59.

      [4] Yalcin, A. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 2008, 72, 1–12.

      [5] Millar, J. H. & Shaw, S. L. (2001). Geographic information systems for transportation principles and applications, Oxford University press, Inc New York 27

      [6] Roy, B. & Vanderpooten, D. (1996). The European school of MCDA,emergency basic features and current works. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision analysis, 5 pp 22-37

      [7] Chakhar, S. & Martel, J. (2003). Enhancing geographical information systems capabilities with Multi-Criteria evaluation functions. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 7, No. 2

      [8] Geneletti, D. B. (2004). A GIS-based decision support system to identify nature conservation priorities in an alpine valley, land-use policy 21 (2004) 149-160. Retrieved August 18, 2015, from: www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol

      [9] Douglas, D H (1994), “Least cost path in GIS using an accumulated cost surface and slope linesâ€, Cartographica, 31(3), 37-51

      [10] Lee, J, D Stucky (1998), “On applying viewshed analysis for determining least-cost paths on Digital Elevation Models†International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 8, pages 891-905

      [11] Dijkstra, E W (1959), “A note on two problems in connexion with graphsâ€, Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269-271.

      [12] Pinto, N., Keitt, T.H. (2009). Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecology 24, 253-266

      [13] Fischer, G., M. Markowski, and J. Antione,(1996)," Multiple criteria land use analysis", Working Paper WP-96-006, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

      [14] Pellegrini, G.B.; Surian, N. Geomorphological study of the Fadalto landslide Venetian Prealps Italy. Landslides Eur. Union 1996, 15, 337–350.

      [15] Nielsen, T.H.; Wright, R.H.; Vlasic, T.C.; Spangle, W.E. Relative Slope Stability and Land-Use Planning in the San Francisco Bay Region California; Professional Paper; U.S. Govt. Print. Off.: Washington, DC, USA, 1979.

      [16]Demir, G.; Aytekin, M.; Akgün, A.; Ikizler, S.B.; Tatar, O. A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat. Hazard. 2013, 65, 1481–1506.

      [17] Pathak, S.; Poudel, R.K.; Kansakar, B.R. Application of Probabilistic Approach in Rock Slope Stability Analysis-An Experience from Nepal Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides. In Proceedings of the INTERPRAEVENT International Symposium Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides, Niigata, Japan, 25–27 September 2006; pp. 797–802.

      [18] Thiebes, B.; Bell, R.; Glade, T. Deterministic Landslide Susceptibility Analysis Using SINMAP-Case Study in the Swabian Alb Germany. In Proceedings of the Conference -Geomorphology for the Future‖, Obergurgl, Austria, 2–7 September 2007; pp. 177–184.

      [19]Oh, H.-J.; Lee, S.; Soedradjat, G.M. Quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at Pemalang area, Indonesia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 60, 1317–1328.

      [20] Akgun, A. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides 2012, 9, 93–106.

      [21] Piacentini, D.; Troiani, F.; Soldati, M.; Notarnicola, C.; Savelli, D.; Schneiderbauer, S.; Strada, C. Statistical analysis for assessing shallow-landslide susceptibility in South Tyrol (south-eastern Alps, Italy). Geomorphology 2012, 151–152, 196–206.

      [22] Pradhan, B.; Lee, S. Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural net-work model focusing on different training sites. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2009, 4, 1–15.

      [23] Pourghasemi, H.R.; Pradhan, B.; Gokceoglu, C. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat. Hazard. 2012, 63, 965–996.

      [24] Arjun, C.R.; Kumar, A. Artificial neural network-based estimation of peak ground acceleration. ISET J. Earthq. Technol. 2009, 46, 19–28.

      [25] Berry, J. K. (2000). Optimal path analysis and corridor routing, infusing stakeholders’ perspective in calibration and weighting of model criteria. Berry & associates spatial information system. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from: http://www.innovativegis.com

      [26] Yu, C, J Lee, M J Munro Stasiuk (2003) “Extensions of least-cost path algorithms for roadway planning†International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, 4, pages 361-376

      [27] Wang, W.-D.; Guo, J.; Fang, L.-G.; Chang, X.-S. A subjective and objective integrated weighting method for landslides susceptibility mapping based on GIS. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 65, 1705–1714.

      [28] Frattini, P.; Crosta, G.; Carrara, A. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng. Geol. 2010, 111, 62–72.

      [29] Lari, S.; Frattini, P.; Crosta, G.B. Integration of natural and technological risks in Lombardy, Italy. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 9, 2085–2106.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    S. Zulkarnain, M., C. Omar, R., N.Z. Baharuddin, I., Roslan, R., & A. Kamarudin, S. (2018). Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) for Route Selection of Transmission Tower. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 912-916. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.26281