Reject Biscuit as an Alternative of Feeding Materials to Improve Quality and Increase the Productivity of Milk in Smallholder Dairy Farms

  • Authors

    • Khusnul Khotimah
    • Galih .
    • Herwintono .
    • Bayu Etti Tri Adiyastiti
    2019-01-26
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.26367
  • Reject biscuit, Crack, Quality, Milk Volume, Smallholder dairy farm

  • Dairy milk in smallholder farms have an average 10-11 liters per days per lactation dairy cows and the milk quality of conventional farms have low production. One of the potential waste manufactures was reject biscuit or “crackâ€. Cracks were still content nutrition of feed material. The aimed of this study was to determine using reject biscuit “crack†as one kind of feed materials in order to increase dairy milk production and alternative feed that the price can reached by smallholder farms. The materials used reject biscuit “crack†obtained from UBM and Garuda Food and the lactation dairy milk. The method used survey and experiment. The materials were used concentrate content crack and without crack, elephant grass, dairy cows strain Fries Holland (FH) and milk for sample. The data were analyzed descriptive qualitative. The result showed that milk of FH cows were given concentrate without crack (T1) had average of Value density = 1.023, dry matters = 11- 11.5% and milk volume = 8 liters/day/head, while given concentrate content crack with composition 50% concentrate content crack+ 50% concentrate without crack (T2) had the average of density = 1.024, dry matters = 11.5- 12,2% and milk volume = 8,6 liters/day/head, and it given 100% concentrate content crack (T3) had the average of density = 1.025, dry matters = 12.5- 14.9%, milk volume = 9,3 liter/day/head. The conclusion of the research were the concentrate content crack can increase productivity the amount of milk volume 16.66%, density value 8% and dry matters 26% when compared to the feed material without crack.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Abdullatif A. Al. Tulaihan, Huthail najib, and Ard Saleh M. Al Eid. (2004). The Nutritional Evaluation of Locally Produced Dried Bakery Waste (DBW). in the Broiler Diet. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 3(5) : 294-299

      [2] Abun. (2008). Hubungan Mikroflora dengan Metabolisme dalam saluran Pencernaan Unggas dan Monogastrik. Makalah Ilmiah Jurusan Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak. Fapet. Unpad. Jatinangor.

      [3] Astawa, P.A., I.B.G. Partama, P. Sudyadnya, and I.N.S. Sutarpa. (2011). Effect of Vitamain- Mineral Supplementtation in Comercial feed on Digestibity Coeficient and Rumen Fermentation of Bali Catle. Journal of The Indonesian Tropical animal Agriculture 36 (1 : 69-74.

      [4] Ayub M., A. Tanveer, M.A. Nadeem and S. M.A. Shah. (2004). Studies on the Fodder Yield and Quality of Shorghum Grown Alaone and in Mixture with Rice Bean. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 2(1) : 46-49.

      [5] Hetherington R.F. and G.L. Krebs. (2002). The Use Of Bakery Wastes In Feedlot rations For Sheep Animal Production Austria Vol. 24 : 89-92.Anim. Prod. Aust. 2002 Vol. 24: 89-9289.

      [6] Singarimbun, M, dan Efendi S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Survey. Yogyakarta :LP3ES.

      [7] Throckmorton, J.C., Ffoulkes, D., Leng, R.A. and Evans, J.V. (1981). In ‘Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 1981’. (Ed. D.J. Farrell) p. 22A (University of New England: Armidale).

      [8] Yeo, J. and K. Kim. (2012). Analisa Pakan Perlakuan. Laboratorium Ilmu dan Nutrisi makanan Ternak. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas padjadjaran. Jatinangor Bandung.Sumedang.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Khotimah, K., ., G., ., H., & Etti Tri Adiyastiti, B. (2019). Reject Biscuit as an Alternative of Feeding Materials to Improve Quality and Increase the Productivity of Milk in Smallholder Dairy Farms. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 8(1.9), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.26367