Network Border Patrol: Prevent Profusion Crash and Prating Decency in the Network

  • Authors

    • B. Pawan Kumar Kurmi
    • Rahul Jain
    • K. Dheeraj Reddy
    • GSGN Anjaneyulu
    2018-10-02
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.26786
  • Border Regulator, Border Observer, Congestion Switch, Congestion Disintegration, CoreStateless Devices, Process To Process Dispute, Internet.

  • Abstract

    The process to process pattern of online network mobbing flow control is a significant constituent in its scalability metrics and heftiness altercation no protocol, mechanism, or ability must be given into the Internet. In this article, we propose and investigate new approach congestion avoidance approach is known as Network Border Patrol (NBP).Process to process congestion traffic control is only single approach; NBP trusts on the conversion and evaluation in the middle of routers at the rims of a network. This depends on priority to identify and restrict not responding traffic flux before they enter the network. However, they are incompetent to avert the jamming disintegration, but damage produced by claims that are insensitive to network online blocking to report the above malady problem.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Van Jacobson, “Congestion avoidance and control,†ACM Computer Communications Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 314–329, Aug. 1988, Proceedings of the Sigcomm ’88 Symposium in Stanford, CA, August, 1988.

      [2] Demers.A, Keshav.S, and Shenker.S, “Analysis and Simulation of a Fair Queueing Algorithm,†in Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, September 1989, pp. 1–12.

      [3] Parekh.A, Gallager.R “A General Approach to Flow Control – the Single Node Case,†IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 344–357, June 1993.

      [4] Stoica, Shenker.S, and Zhang.H, "Center Stateless Fair Queueing: Achieving Approximately Fair Bandwidth Allocations in High Speed Networks," in Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, September 1998, pp. 118–130.

      [5] Cao.Z, Wang.Z, and Zegura.E, "Rainbow Fair Queuing: Fair Bandwidth Sharing Without Per-Flow State," in Proc. of IEEE Infocom '2000, March 2000.

      [6] Container.R, Prabhakar.B, and Psounis.K, "Gag - A stateless dynamic line administration plan for approximating reasonable transfer speed assignment," in Proc. of IEEE Infocom '2000, March 2000.

      [7] Suter.B, Lakshman.T.V, Stiliadis.D and Choudhury.A, "Outline Considerations for Supporting TCP with Per-Flow Queueing," in Proc. of IEEE Infocom '98, March 1998, pp. 299–305.

      [8] Braden.B, Clark.D, "Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet," RFC 2309, IETF, April 1998, https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc2309.pdf.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Pawan Kumar Kurmi, B., Jain, R., Dheeraj Reddy, K., & Anjaneyulu, G. (2018). Network Border Patrol: Prevent Profusion Crash and Prating Decency in the Network. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.10), 908-912. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.26786

    Received date: 2019-01-30

    Accepted date: 2019-01-30

    Published date: 2018-10-02