The Typology of the Gayo Traditional House Facade is Reviewed Based on the Context of the form Element Analysis

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The building facade is an important element in the delivery of functions, meanings and a period of culture when the building stands. This study was carried out to dig deeper into the typology of the facade of the traditional Gayo house which is a heritage house of Reje Baluntara. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the facade typology of Gayo traditional house buildings in an effort to explore historical data and as a data inventory that would later be useful in developing the scientific treasures of traditional architecture which became the archipelago's architectural cultural heritage. The typology of facades in the Gayo traditional house was carried out with the aim of: classifying the formation of facade-forming elements, obtaining a dominant formation on each element forming the facade so that it can be found in the traditional Gayo house inherited from Reje Baluntara which still retains its authenticity. In this study, the method used was descriptive-qualitative. The analysis used is by classifying facades based on the shape elements of the facade field, namely the basic field, the wall area and the upper field or roof area. The findings of this study are found that the basic field facade typology which is the base area of the building becomes the most important part, because it relates to the transition to land, so the foundation of the building is the most important element to stand the building, there are 26 columns in a gayo traditional house arranged in a grid 3 meters with an umpak foundation system using large and strong stones. There are not many openings in the facade on the wall, this is done as a context for the temperature of the relatively cold Gayo area. Typology of roof formation is a roof shield that extends and is the main roof.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Typology; Building facade; Element façade;Tradisional house; Gayo

  • References


      [1] Alfiah and S. Ratriana, Rumah Panggung Sebagai Pemecahan Terhadap Bencana Banjir, Lahan Parkir, Area Bermain Dan Bersosialisasi, National Academic Journal of Architecture, vol.5, no.1, pp76-77, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/nature.v5i1a9

      [2] A, Hardiatha. “Rumah Adat Pitu Ruang Gayo Takengon Aceh Tengah Provinsi Aceh”. Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni. Universitas Negeri Yogy karta. Yogyakarta 2010, pp

      [3] B.Y.Salahaddin. “Influence of Modernity Versus Continuity of Architectural Identity on House Façade in Erbil City, Iraq’, 2018, pp 66-69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329337353_

      [4] Ching, D.K., (2008) .Bentuk Ruang dan Tatanan. (Edisi III).:Penerbit Erlangga

      [5] Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu, and S. Lu, “Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared,” in Grid Computing Environ- ments Workshop, 2008. GCE’08, 2008, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2008.4738445.

      [6] M. I. Bunga and Antariksa, S.Noviani, “Tipologi Fasade Bangunan Kolonial Di Koridor Jalan Letnan Jenderal Soeprapto Kota Semarang,” Arsitektur e-journal, vol.4, no. 3., pp. 145-146, 2011.https://www.academia.edu/7014265/

      [7] Moneo.R, “On Typology: Ordering Space Type in Architectural Design, Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork, 1994. pp

      [8] Pesona Tanoh Gayo (1994), Emun Berangkat. pp.153

      [9] R, Amos. House Form and Culture.. USA, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, N. J

      [10] R.Krier, Komposisi Arsitektur, translated by S.Effendi, Erlangga Jakarta, 1996, pp.122

      [11] S. Putri and D.Armelia, L.P . Nova, “Analisis Semiotika Simbol pada Umah Pitu Ruang di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah”, Proceedings IPLBI 2017, pp I-039-041. https://doi.org/10.32315/ti.6.i039

      [12] Y.Ashihara (1974),Exterior Design in Architecure. London


 

View

Download

Article ID: 26848
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.26848




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.