Increasing Competitiveness of the Agrarian Sector of the Regional Russian Economy Russia

  • Authors

    • Tatyana G. Gurnovich
    • Lyubov V. Agarkova
    • Lyudmila N. Usenko
    • Elena A.Ostapenko
    • . .
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.25.26919
  • competitiveness, state regulation, regional agribusiness, marketing interaction, agriculture, agricultural production, agricultural producers, strategic associations.

  • Abstract

    The Russian agro-food market is currently characterized by the imperfection of economic relations between the spheres of production, processing and marketing and by insufficient level of infrastructure development, which negatively affects the efficiency of agricultural production and weakens the competitive advantages of producers. The problem of ensuring the competitiveness of Russian agrarians worsened due to the events of foreign economic nature: Russia entering the World Trade Organization, food embargo, a drop in oil prices on world markets. The way out is seen in the interaction between the subjects of the food market on the basis of marketing and the creation of strategic production associations as an important element of the infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex (AIC). The present paper considers the possibility of using the marketing tool for interaction in the agricultural sector of the Russian economy under the conditions of the opposite tendencies of globalization: integration and disintegration. The aim of the study is to develop recommendations for ensuring the competitiveness of agricultural producers by interaction marketing techniques and the creation of strategic alliances. Therefore, models for identifying threats and opportunities for agricultural organizations are developed; the algorithm for state regional AIC development programs is justified, the scheme of marketing interaction between the subjects of the strategic association is improved; the methodology for assessing the synergetic effect from the formation of a strategic association of commodity producers is adapted. The theoretical and practical significance of the results obtained for the Russian AIC is to expand the toolkit for increasing the competitiveness of farmers through methods of marketing interaction, popular in international practice. The proposed recommendations can be used in making managerial decisions on the formulation of program-targeted strategies for regional AIC development Russia.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Abramov V. L. Management of competitiveness of economic systems / V.L. Abramov; Moscow. IHSB ‘MIRBIS’, Moscow; Perm: Perm State Administration. center of scientific-techn. Inform., 2004. 294 p.

      [2] Altukhov A.I. Prodovolstvennaya bezopasnost Rossii v usloviyakh zarubezhnykh sanktsiy [Food security of Russia under conditions of foreign sanctions]. AIC: Economics, Management, 2014, No.12, pp.19-29.

      [3] Ambler T. Practical Marketing. (Russ. ed.: Petrova I., Vasilyeva V., Kapterevskiy Yu. N. Prakticheskiy marketing. St. Petersburg, PiterPubl., 1999. 395 p.).

      [4] Ansoff I. The New Corporate Strategy. (Russ. ed.:Novaya korporativnaya strategiya. St. Petersburg, Piter Kom Publ., 2013. 416 p.).

      [5] Azoev G.L. Konkurentsiya: analiz, strategiya i praktika [Competition: analysis, strategy and practice]. Moscow: Center for Economics and Marketing, 2013. 208 p.

      [6] Berry L. L. Relationship marketing of services – growing interest, emerging perspectives / L. L. Berry // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1995. V.23. Issue 4. P. 236-245.

      [7] Berry L. L. Relationship Marketing. Emerging Perspectives on Service Marketing / Eds. L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, G. D. Upah. Chicago, 1983. P. 25.

      [8] Campbell A. Strategicheskiy sinergizm [Strategic Synergy]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 406 p.

      [9] Davoudi SMM, Fartash K, Venera G. Zakirova, Asiya M. Belyalova, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Anna V. Boiarchuk, Zhanna M. Sizova (2018). Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology Park, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1359-1369.

      [10] Dayer J, Singh H. The relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage // Academy of Management Review. 1998. V.23. P.660-679.

      [11] Dolan EJ, Lindsay DE Market: microeconomic model/Edwin J. Dolan, David E. Lindsay. St. Petersburg: Pechatny dvor, 1992. 496 p.

      [12] Fartash K., Davoudi, S.M.M., Tatiana A. Baklashova, Natalia V. Svechnikova 4, Yulia V. Nikolaeva, Svetlana A. Grimalskaya (2018). The Impact of Technology Acquisition & Exploitation on Organizational Innovation and Organizational Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1497-1507.

      [13] Fatkhutdinov R.A. Konkurentosposobnost: ekonomika, strategiya, upravleniye [Competitiveness: economy, strategy, management]. M.: INFRA-M, 2000. 311 p.

      [14] Fatkhutdinov R.A. Strategicheskiy menedzhment [Strategic management]. Moscow, Intel-Sintez, 2012. 246 p.

      [15] Freebairn J.W. Implications of Wages and Industrial Policies on Competitiveness of Agricultural Export Industries // Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics. 1987. V.6: P.79-87.

      [16] Gediev K.T., Klintsevich R.I. Povysheniye effektivnosti sveklosakharnogo podkompleksa regiona na osnove marketinga vzaimodeystviya [Improving the efficiency of sugar beet subcomplex in the region on the basis of marketing interaction]// Regional economy: theory and practice. 2014. No 16. P.55-62

      [17] Golodova O.A. Marketingovoe obespechenie konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennykh predpriyatiy v usloviyakh integratsionnogo vzaimodeystviya [Marketing support of industrial enterprises’ competitiveness under conditions of integration cooperation]. Volgograd, VSU, 2007. 258 p.

      [18] Hezrich R., Peters M. Entrepreneurship, or how to start a business and succeed. M., Progress-Universus, 1991. 159 p.

      [19] Hosking A. Course of Entrepreneurship. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1993. 349 p.

      [20] Hovell P.J. The marketing concept and corporate strategy: a will-o-the-wisp relationship? / Hovell P.J. // Management Decision, 1977. V.17 No.2. P. 157-67.

      [21] Hunt S.D. On rethinking marketing: our discipline, our practice, our methods / S.D. Hunt // European Journal of Marketing. 1994. V.28. No.3. P.13-25.

      [22] Kalitskaya V.V. Konkurentosposobnost prodovolstvennogo rynka v modelyakh, periodakh i fazakh ego razvitiya [Competitiveness of the food market in models, periods and phases of its development]. Yekaterinburg, USAU, 2013.17 p.

      [23] Kalman R. E. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction // Transaction ASME Journal of Basic Engineering. 1960. â„– 86. pp. 35-45.

      [24] Ketova N.P. Marketing v rynochnoy ekonomike Rossii: realizatsiya traditsionnykh kontseptsiy i videniye perspektiv razvitiya v XXI veke [Marketing in the market economy of Russia: implementation of traditional concepts and vision of development prospects in the 21st century] // The South-Russian Forum. 2012. No 1 (4). P.69-86.

      [25] Kirilenko A.S. Sovremennye integratsionnye protsessy v APK [Current integration processes in AIC]. AIC: Economics, Management, 2008, No.10, pp. 21-25.

      [26] Kirzner I.M. Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship. (Russ. ed.: Prof. Romanov A.N., Konkurentsiya I predprinimatelstvo, Moscow, YUNITI-DANA., 2001. 239 p.).

      [27] Kleiner G.B. Mikroekonomika znaniy i konkurentosposobnost predpriyatiy [Microeconomics of knowledge and competitiveness of enterprises]. Contemporary competition. 2007. No.3. Pp. 128-131.

      [28] Koladina Ye.A. Mezhotraslevaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya: opytsistemnogo analiza [Inter-industrial economic integration: experience of system analysis]. Irkutsk, BSU, 2013. 140 p.

      [29] Komkov N.I., Lazarev A.V. [Mnogourovnevaya struktura i podkhody k otsenke ekonomicheskoy kategorii ‘konkurentosposobnost’] Multi-level structure and approaches to the assessment of the economic category ‘competitiveness’]. Problems of Forecasting. 2007. No.4. Pp. 3-19.

      [30] Korshunova G.V. Strukturnye osnovy konkurentosposobnosti [Structural fundamentals of competitiveness]. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2012, No. 8, pp. 35-48.

      [31] Koshurnikova Yu.Ye. Razvitie kontseptsii marketinga vzaimootnosheniy: teoreticheskiy i prikladnoy aspekt [Development of the relationship marketing concepts: theoretical and applied aspect], Fundamental research, 2013, No. 6-3, pp. 688-692.

      [32] Kotler Ph. Marketing Essentials. (Russ. ed.: Bobrov V.B. Osnovy marketinga, Moscow, Rostinter, 2013, 704 p.).

      [33] Krotkov AM, Eleneva Yu.Ya. Konkurentosposobnost predpriyatiya: podkhody k obespecheniyu, kriterii, metody otsenki [Competitiveness of the enterprise: approaches to collateral, criteria, evaluation methods]. Marketing in Russia and abroad. 2001. No.6. Pp. 59-68.

      [34] Mansurov R.E. Kriterii otsenki konkurentosposobnosti agropromyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Criteria for assessing the competitiveness of an agro-industrial enterprise]. Bulletin of Altai State Agrarian University. 2011. No.4 (78). P.100-105.

      [35] Moiseeva N.K. Marketing of interaction in conditions of intensification of scientific and technical progress (problems and opportunities) [Marketing vzaimodeystviya v usloviyakh intensifikatsii nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa (problemy i vozmozhnosti)]/ G.L. Bagiev, H. Meffert and others // Marketing of interaction. Concept. Strategies. Efficiency. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics 2009. P. 276-278.

      [36] Neuenfeldt S. et al. Using market share and multiplicative competitive interaction models to explain structural change in the German agricultural sector / S. Neuenfeldt., N. Röder, A. Gocht, M. Espinosa, S. G. Y Paloma // No. 182955, 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia, from European Association of Agricultural Economists/

      [37] Paul E. Samuelson. Monopolistic competition - revolution in theory [Electronic resource]: electron. data. M .: Scientific digital library PORTALUS.RU, December 13, 2004. Access mode: http://portalus.ru/modules/economics/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1102953998&archive=1120044309&start_from=&ucat=& (free access). Date of access: 02/02/2018.

      [38] Pezenti A. Ocherki politicheskoy ekonomii kapitalizma [Essays on the Political Economy of Capitalism]. M., Progress, 1976. Vol. 1. 840 p.

      [39] Pezenti A. Ocherki politicheskoy ekonomii kapitalizma ]Essays on the Political Economy of Capitalism]. M., Progress, 1976. Vol. 2. 885 p.

      [40] Popova Yu.F. Setevoy podkhod v marketinge [Network approach in marketing] / G.L. Bagiev, H. Meffert and others // Marketing of interaction. Concept. Strategies. Efficiency. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics 2009. P. 276-278.

      [41] Porter M. Competitive strategy: The analysis of industries and competitors / Michael Porter. Moscow: Alpina, 2011. 453 p.

      [42] Porter, M. International competition: Competitor. advantages of countries: Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1993. 895 p.

      [43] RichardL. Kohls, Uhl. JosephN. Marketing of Agricultural Products (Russ. ed.: Dolgopolova V.G. Marketing selskokhozyaystvennoy produktsii, Moscow, Kolos, 2000. 512 p.).

      [44] Sadovskaya T.G. et al. Primeneniye matematicheskikh metodov i modeley v upravlenii organizatsionno-ekonomicheskimi faktorami konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [The application of mathematical methods and models in the management of organizational and economic factors of the competitiveness of an industrial enterprise] / T.G. Sadovskaya, P.A. Drogovoz, V.A. Dadonov, V.I. Melnikov // Audit and financial analysis. 2009. No.3. P.364-379.

      [45] Smith A. A Study on the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. M.: Eksmo, 2005. 960 p.

      [46] Taştan, S.B., Davoudi, S.M.M., Masalimova, A.R., Bersanov, A.S., Kurbanov, R.A., Boiarchuk, A.V., Pavlushin, A.A.(2018). The Impacts of Teacher’s Efficacy and Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement in Science Education among Secondary and High School Students, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353-2366.

      [47] Thorelli H. Networks: between markets and hierarchies // Strategic Management Journal 1986. V.6: P.37-51.

      [48] Tretyak O.A. Marketing vzaimodeystviya i partnerskikh vzaimootnosheniy: novyye napravleniya issledovaniy i instrumentariy [Marketing of interaction and partnerships: new directions of research and tools] Russian Journal of Management. 2008. No.2. Pp. 132-133.

      [49] Ushachev I.G. Strategic directions of AIC development in Russia under conditions of regional integration and globalization. Agrarnaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh mezhdunarodnoy i regionalnoy integratsii: Trudy mezhdunarodnoy NPK, posvyashchennoy 85-letiyu VNIIESKh [Agricultural policy of Russia under conditions of international and regional integration: Proceedings of the international research conference dedicated to 85th anniversary of All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of the Economy of Agriculture] 2015, 442p.

      [50] Vasilyeva Z.A. Ierarkhiya ponyatiy konkurentosposobnosti subektov rynka [Hierarchy of the market subjects’ competitiveness concepts]. Marketing in Russia and abroad, 2006, No. 2, pp. 83-89.

      [51] VI Bogachev, VG Penner, OV. Bundukov, KV Kravchenko. Organizatsiya i upravleniye NTP v regione v usloviyakh globalizatsii ekonomiki [Organization and management of scientific and technical progress in the region in the context of economic globalization]. Lugansk - Rovenky: Nauka, 2009. 260 p.

      [52] Vorst J., Reventlow P. The economics of the firm: a textbook. M: Vyshaya Shkola, 1994. 272 p.

      [53] Waterman R. The renewal factor: How the best companies retain their competitiveness. M.: Progress, 1988. 362 p.

      [54] Yemelyanov A.M. Agrarnye riski vstupleniya Rossii v VTO, ikh ekonomicheskie i politicheskie istoki. Agroprodovolstvennaya politika i vstuplenie Rossii v VTO [Agrarian risks of Russia’s accession to the WTO, their economic and political grounds. Agri-food policy and Russia’s accession to the WTO]. Moscow, RAAS Publ., 2003. pp. 24-27.

      [55] Zavyalov P.S. Konkurentosposobnost i marketing [Competitiveness and marketing] // Russian economic journal. 1995. No.12. P.55.

      [56] Zhemukhov A.Kh. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva [Assessment of competitiveness of agro-industrial production]. Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises, 2011, No. 7, pp.30-34.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    G. Gurnovich, T., V. Agarkova, L., N. Usenko, L., A.Ostapenko, E., & ., . (2018). Increasing Competitiveness of the Agrarian Sector of the Regional Russian Economy Russia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.25), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.25.26919

    Received date: 2019-01-31

    Accepted date: 2019-01-31

    Published date: 2018-11-30