Usage of the Floor-Lifting Method for Buildings Erection with Precast-Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Frames of «KUB» or Similar Frame Systems
-
2018-10-13 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27218 -
Floor lifting method, “KUB†system, precast-monolithic frames. -
Abstract
Usage of the floor-lifting method for buildings erection with precast-monolithic reinforced concrete frames of «KUB» or similar frame system was reviewed in the article. Analysis of technological features of proposed method was done. Advantages and disadvantages of proposed method usage were listed. Opportunity of floor-lifting method of reinforced concrete frames buildings erection in dense areas usage was justified. Usage of the floor-lifting method for erection of buildings with precast-monolithic reinforced concrete frames of «KUB» or similar frame system allows to reduce the works complexity due to the complete refusal to use the equipment for the verification and temporary fixing of slabs individual elements and the operations exclusion associated with the retrieval and temporary fixing floor slabs elements. Proposed method usage allows to move majority of assembly operations to the ground floor level, which can significantly increase the industrial safety level, improve the work and control quality. Reducing the installation parameters values, allows to use less powerful self-propelled cranes for building frame elements installation, in some cases, completely refuse to use the tower cranes. It makes sense to use this building frameworks erection method in dense urban areas. The main disadvantage of this method is the high demanding quality of the slabs elements production. Because the surface of the slab is the basis for the next floor slab, inaccurate factory production will not allow the exact slabs elements installation in the required position.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] Deltabeam Composite beam: designer manual, Peikko group, Canada, (2013), 18 p., available online: http://goo.gl/pNuG5
[2] Deltabeam Installations Instructions, Peikko group, Canada, (2009), 8 p. available online: http://goo.gl/EqL8K
[3] Pavlikov AN, Balyasnii DK, Harkava OV, Dovzhenko OO, Mykytenko SM, Pinchuk NM, Fedorov DF, Modern constructive systems of buildings from reinforced concrete: Monograph, Poltava: PoltNTU, (2017), 120 p.
[4] Kobzar II, Ostashevska GG, Zolotova NM, Construction Technology: Tutorial, Kharkiv, (2011), 171 p.
[5] ZHvan VD, Pomazan MD, ZHvan OV, Construction and installation of buildings and structures: Tutorial, Kharkiv, (2011), 396 p.
[6] Pavlikov AN, Krutov VA, Petter BN, “Industrial non-beam frame building systems for residential buildings", Building Structures, No. 81, (2014), pp: 286-293, available online: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/buko_2014_81_36
[7] Pavlikov AN, Zotsenko NL, Vynnykov YuL, “Improved industrial noncapital-nonbeam structural building system for solving the problem of affordable housing in Ukraineâ€, Proceedings of the Intern. scientific and technical. Conf. "Scientific and technological progress in building and architecture", (2014), pp. 145–152.
[8] Firm “KUBâ€, Unified system of precast-monolithic noncrossbar. Basic provisions for the calculation, installation and layout of buildings: working project: in 9 issues, Journal of Safety Research, Moscow: Monolith, (1990).
[9] Pavlikov AM, “Implementation of the noncross-beam-noncapitel framework system in the design of buildings for affordable housingâ€, Resource-saving materials, constructions, buildings and structures, No. 27, (2013), pp. 352–359.
[10] Zyma OE, Dyachenko EV, Pahomov RI, Zhyhylii SM, “Works execution organization at reconstruction and renovation of buildings after the fire with usage of slabs lifting method“, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol.7, No 2.23, (2018), pp: 242-246. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.23.11951
[11] Chichulina K, Chichulin V, “Steel statically uncertain transverse frames probabilistic calculationâ€, International Journal of Engineering &Technology (IJET), Vol 7, No. 3.2. Special Issue 2, (2018), p. 79-85, available online: https://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijet/article/view/14379/5810
[12] Gasii G, Hasii O, and Zabolotskyi O, “Estimate of technical and economic benefits of a new space composite structureâ€, MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 116, (2017), pp. 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711602014.
[13] Caldwell M, The Fort Stanwix Administrative History: A Superintendent‘s Perspective, Vol.31, No.2, The Public Historian, (2009).
[14] El Gawady M, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M, “A Review of Conventional Seismic Retrofitting Techniques for URMâ€, Proceedings of the 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (July 4 - 7), Amsterdam, (2004).
[15] Smith A, Redman T, “A Critical Review of Retrofitting Methods for Unreinforced Masonry Strucutresâ€, Proceedings of the EWB-UK Research Conference, The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, (2009).
[16] Perelmuter, A. V., & Pichugin, S. F. (2014). Issues on estimation of building structure vulnerability. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 49(5), 5-14+121. https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.49.1
[17] Leshchenko M. V., Semko V. O. Thermal characteristics of the external walling made of cold-formed steel studs and polystyrene concrete. Magazine of Civil Engineering. № 8, (2015), pp. 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.60.6
[18] Semko O., Yurin O., Avramenko Yu., Skliarenko S. Thermophysical aspects of cold roof spaces. MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 116, (2017), р. 02030. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711602030
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Dyachenko, E., Zyma, O., Scherbinin, L., & akarenko, R. M. (2018). Usage of the Floor-Lifting Method for Buildings Erection with Precast-Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Frames of «KUB» or Similar Frame Systems. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27218Received date: 2019-02-11
Accepted date: 2019-02-11
Published date: 2018-10-13