Manufacture Technological Structure Innovation Strategy Development Modeling in Terms of the New Ecological and Economic Doctrine
-
2018-10-13 
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27318
-
economic and mathematical modeling, production technological structure, ecological and economic production function. -
Economic growth with restrictions on ensuring economic balance implementation and greenhouse gases balance with the efficiency criterion in the form of production construction technological structure sustainable development model using research construction methods is fulfilled in the article. Aggregation procedure method is developed based on original micro-description research and the ecological and economic production function is constructed in explicit analytical form. Gross output modeling is carried out depending on the draw economic and ecological resources amount and technological production structure changes. The obtained results give an opportunity to evaluate any mechanism introduction impact for environmental management on the environment state and industrial enterprises economic development.
Â
 -
References
[1] D. E. James H.M.A. Jansen J.B. Opschoor, Economic Approaches to Environmental Problems Techniques and Results of Empirical Analysis, Elsevier, (1978), pp. 97-171.
[2] Alexey A. Voinov, Systems Science and Modeling for Ecological Economics, Academic Press, (2008), pp. 29-78.
[3] Jason Shogren, Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, Elsevier Science, (2013), pp. 645-829.
[4] Benjamin K.Sovacool, “Reviewing, Reforming, and Rethinking Global Energy Subsidies: Towards a Political Economy Research Agendaâ€, Ecological Economics, Vol. 135, (2017), pp. 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.009
[5] Lukas Hardt, Daniel W. O'Neill, “Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developmentsâ€, Ecological Economics, Vol. 134, (2017), pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.027
[6] Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Rudolf de Groot, Pedro L. Lomas, Carlos Montes, “The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemesâ€, Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, Issue 6, (2010), pp. 1209-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
[7] La Torre D., Liuzzi D., Marsiglio S., “Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over timeâ€, Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 78, (2015), pp. 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.09.001
[8] Carmen Marchiori, Simon Dietz, Alessandro Tavoni, “Domestic politics and the formation of international environmental agreementsâ€, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 81, (2017), pp. 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.009
[9] Sascha Kollenberg, LucaTaschini, “Emissions trading systems with cap adjustmentsâ€, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 80, (2016), pp. 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.003
[10] Sun Guodong, Mu Mu, “Assessing the characteristics of net primary production due to future climate change and CO2 under RCP4.5 in Chinaâ€, Ecological Complexity, Vol. 34, (2018), pp. 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.04.001
[11] NobuyukiTakashima, “International environmental agreements with ancillary benefits: Repeated games analysisâ€, Economic Modelling, Vol.61, (2017), pp. 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.10.011
[12] Richard A.Stillman, Kevin A.Wood, John D.Goss-Custard, “Deriving simple predictions from complex models to support environmental decision-makingâ€, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 326, pp. 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.014
[13] Samantha J.Cartwright, Katharine M.Bowgen, CatherineCollop, KieranHyder, JacobNabe-Nielsen, RichardStafford, Richard A.Stillman, Robert B.Thorpe, Richard M.Sibly, †Communicating complex ecological models to non-scientist end usersâ€, Ecological Modelling, Vol. 338, (2016), pp. 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.012
[14] YibingZhao, CanWang, YuweiSun, XianbingLiu, â€Factors influencing companies' willingness to pay for carbon emissions: Emission trading schemes in Chinaâ€, Energy Economics, Vol. 75, (2018), pp. 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.001
[15] Fujimori, S., Masui, T., Matsuoka, Y., “Gains from emission trading under multiple stabilization targets and technological constraintsâ€, Energy Economics, Vol. 48, (2015), pp. 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.011
[16] Dong-HyeonKim, Yu-BoSuen, Shu-ChinLin, “Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Trade: Evidence from Disaggregate Trade Dataâ€, Energy Economics, Available online 23 August 2018, In Press, Accepted Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.019
[17] Katsuya Ito, “CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countriesâ€, International Economics, Vol. 151, (2017), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.02.001
[18] Pahomov R, Zyma O, Dyachenko E, “Analysis and Prevention of Industrial Injury in the Construction Sectorâ€, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol.7, No 3.2, (2018), pp: 285-290. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14421
-
Downloads
-
-
How to Cite
Onyshchenko, A., & Kharchenko, Y. (2018). Manufacture Technological Structure Innovation Strategy Development Modeling in Terms of the New Ecological and Economic Doctrine. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 625-630. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27318
