The Methodology for Selecting a Promising Functional Specialization of а Suburban Rural Settlement

  • Authors

    • Tetiana Kuzmenko
    • Vasyl Liakh
    • Andrii Dmytrenko
    • Kostiantyn Trehubov
    2018-10-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27330
  • suburban zone, functional and planning organization, suburban rural settlement (SRS), algorithm of choice, functional specialization
  • Abstract

    A retrospective analysis of the rural settlements’ typology has been carried out; the most common types of suburban rural settlements (SRS) have been identified: satellites, recreational and production ones. Within these basic types, 14 possible SRS subtypes are proposed. Modern tendencies in changes of SRS functional and planning organization are revealed. These changes relate to the deterioration of the cultural and domestic service sector, a significant increase in the rural settlement area with a decrease in its population, stratification of rural population by employment, income, ownership ratio, etc. Functional-planning organization of SRS is conditioned by its specialization. Functional specialization of a settlement, or formation a certain new type based on the traditional settlement, depends on the settlement’s resources. The analysis has defined the determinants of the development and formation of functional SRS type, and has revealed the parameters that determine the total effect of these factors. To determine the functional type of settlement as a strategy for its development, the methodology of the point’s assessment of the determining parameters characterizing the settlement’s resources is proposed. The algorithm of definition of suburban rural settlements’ functional specialization is developed, which provides comparison of alternative variants of SRS functional specialization.

     

     
  • References

    1. [1] Velihotska YuS Biomorfichni planuvalni pryntsypy formuvannia ekoselyshch, Proceedings of Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia: KhNUMH im. O. M. Beketova, (2018), pp. 21-22.

      [2] Devyatova NM Arkhitektura predpriyatiy khudozhestvennykh promyslov. Arkhitektura SSSR,(1989), â„–5. pp. 78-85.

      [3] Domina MO, Dreval IV Ekolohichni peredumovy formuvannia kotedzhnykh mistechok yak novykh selbyshch nykh utvoren, Proceedings of Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia: KhNUMH im. O. M. Beketova, (2018), pp.39-40.

      [4] Dmytrenko AYu, Pryntsypy functsyonalno-planuvalnoii organizatsii malykh silskych poselen (na prykladi Pivnichno-Skhidnoho rehionu Ukraiiny), unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, PNTU, (2006), pp. 1– 212.

      [5] Zakovorotnaya TA, Osobennosti planirovki i zastroiki selskich poseleniy v sisteme rasseleniya. Architekturno-planirovochnaya organizatsia selskich naselennyh punktov, Kuibyshev Civil Engineering Institute, pp. 41 – 48.

      [6] Zaslavskaia TI, Vinogradov EV. Faktornyi analiz prichin migratsii selskogo naseleniya. Sotsiologiya i matematika, Novosibirsk, (1970), pp. 1-153.

      [7] Ekolohichnyi atlas Poltavshchyny (za red. Holik YuS, Baranovskyi VA, Illiash OE), Poltava , (2007), рр..1-128.

      [8] Kovalyov SA. Selskoe rasselenye (geograficheskie issledovaniya), MGU, (1963), pp. 29-84.

      [9] Kodin VA, Arkhitekturno-planirovochnaya organizatsiya agrorekreatsionnykh sel (na prymere Lesostepnoy zony USSR), unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, KISI, (1988), pp. 1-199.

      [10] Koniuk AYe. Napriamy formuvannia ekoposelen v Ukraiini, Proceeding of the II International Scientific Practical Conference “ Architecture: Aesthetic + Ecology + Economicsâ€, PNTU, 2017, pp. 80-81.

      [11] Kolodin KYu. Formoobrazovanie obyektov zagorodnoi sredy, Moskva, (2004), pp. 1-252.

      [12] Kuzmenko TYu, Obosnovaniye funktsyonalnoi spetsyalizatsii i transformatsii planirovochnoi struktury prigorodnych selskich poseleniy, Proceedings of the The New Ideas of New Century – 2014, Vol. 2, (2014), pp.153 – 158, available online: http://pntu.edu.ru/media/filer_public/65/c9/65c96b71-c588-4a1b-925b-e300eb4320bc/2014_new_ideas_of_new_centuryvol 1min.pdf, last visit:20.04.2018

      [13] Kuzmenko TYu, Pryntsypy functsyonalno-planuvalnoii orhanizatsii prymiskych silskych poselen (na prykladi Pivnichno-Skhidnoho regionu Ukraiiny), unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, PNTU, (2017), pp. 1– 241

      [14] Ogoniok VO, Architekturno-planuvalna reorhanizatsiya ta rozvytok socialnoii infrastruktury silskykh poselen v umovakh intensyvnykh transformatsii, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Lvivska Politechnica, (2013), pp. 1– 23.

      [15] Pustovetov GI Architektura selskikh poselenyi v novych sotsyalno-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh (zhylyie i proizvodstvennyie zdaniya I sooruzheniya) unpublished ScD. Dissertation, ÐœÐRHI, (2003), pp. 1 – 30.

      [16] Sosnova NS, Lypchey II Formuvanniya hromadskykh prostoriv sela-kurortu Shaiyan Zakarpatskoii oblasti, Visnyk Nacionnal’nogo universitetu “Lvivska politechnika†Seriya: Arkhitektura, No 856, (2016), pp. 139 – 144.

      [17] Stepanyuk AV Architekturno-planuvalna rekonstruktsiya tsentralnych sil pervynnoyi systemy rozselennya (na prykladi Lvivskoyi oblasti) unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Lvivska Politechnica, (2011), pp. 1– 24.

      [18] Yatsenko VO. Kotedzhni mistechka – novyi element rozselennia prymiskoi zony velykykh mist Ukrainy, Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, No 38, (2015), pp. 349-358, available online: http://library.knuba.edu.ua/ books/zbirniki/01/201538.pdf , last visit:20.04.2018

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Kuzmenko, T., Liakh, V., Dmytrenko, A., & Trehubov, K. (2018). The Methodology for Selecting a Promising Functional Specialization of а Suburban Rural Settlement. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 660-664. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27330

    Received date: 2019-02-12

    Accepted date: 2019-02-12

    Published date: 2018-10-13