National Unique Features of The Country House Concept

  • Authors

    • Lyudmyla Cherednyk
    • Elena Shevchenko
    • Nataliia Bondar
    2018-10-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27450
  • artistic concept, basic concept, country house concept, ethnoculture, idiostyle, mentalit.

  • Abstract

    The article highlights peculiarities of verbalization and semantic content of the country house (KHATA) concept in the Ukrainian literature, in the works of Grigoriy and Grigir Tyutyunnyk in particular. It systematizes linguistic views on the nature of linguomental constructions, provides definitions of the main linguo-cognitive categories; basic mentality concept is brought to the fore, as a fixed in the dictionary notion, meaningful to a culture with ethnospecific semantic shade, which accumulates relatively stable ideas related to socio-historical experience and value orientations of the nation. The paper studies the correlations between linguistic and artistic concepts, actualizes linguistic and cultural aspects of realia that embody life, world-view, the Ukrainian countrymen’ culture. Attention is paid to the configuration of lexical and phraseological units expressing the Ukrainian culture fundamental concepts  and world perception of the word painters; their role in the figurative system and idiostyle paradigm, taking into account metaphorical expression, contextual surrounding, ethnocultural and peculiar authorial symbols is investigated. The specificity of the prose writing, which consists in the frequent use of archaic, colloquial, dialectal words and constructions, specifically Ukrainian phraseology and etiquette formulas that ethnically color the concept of KHATA, are pointed out. PAINTED STOVE, EMBROIDERED RUSHNYK, HOLY PICTURES, ASTERS and STORK NESTS on the roof are peculiar for the Ukrainian KHATA. For a COUNTRYMAN it was not just a living place, a place of initiation and ritualization, it was his BEGINNING, GENEALOGY, FATHERLAND.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Areshenkov Yu. O. Kontsept “khata†v poetychnomu idiostyli T. Shevchenka. Ukrainska mova sered inshykh slovianskykh: etnolohichni ta hramatychni parametry. Kryvyi Rih: Vydavnychyi dim, 2009, pp. 108–114.

      [2] Banfi A. Filosofiya iskusstva. Moskva : Iskusstvo, 1989. 384 s.

      [3] Bulashev H. Ukrainskyi narod u svoikh lehendakh, relihiinykh pohliadakh ta viruvanniakh: kosmohonichni ukrainski narodni pohliady ta viruvannia. Kyiv, 1993, 414 p.

      [4] Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazyikov. Moskva : Yazyiki russkoy kulturyi, 1999, 780 p.

      [5] Vilchynska T. Kontseptualizatsiia sakralnoho v ukrainskii poetychnii movi KhVII – KhVIII st.: monohrafiia. Ternopil: Dzhura, 2008, 424 p.

      [6] Holoborodko K. Yu. Kontseptosfera movotvorchosti Oleksandra Olesia : dys. …d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.01.Kharkiv, 2011, 519 p.

      [7] Holubovska I. O. Linhvokulturni kontsepty u movnii kartyni svitu ukrainskoho etnosu. KhKh – KhKhI stolittia: zhanrovo-stylovi y linhvistychni metamorfozy v ukrainskii movi ta literaturi : kolektyvna monohrafiia / za red. A. Arkhanhelskoi. Olomouc:VUP, 2016, pp. 71–95.

      [8] Homeniuk O. O. Kontseptosfery flory i fauny v ukrainskii dytiachii prozi Ye. Hutsala i M. Vinhranovskoho: dys. … kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.01.Ternopil, 2015, 328. p.

      [9] Danyliuk A. Ukrainska khata. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1991, 108 p.

      [10] Iefymenko O. Ye.Kontsept “step†v ukrainskii movi:slovnykova,tekstova i psykholinhvistychna paradyhma: dys. … kand. filol. nauk : spets. 10.02.01 / KhNPU im. H. S. Skovorody. Kharkiv, 2005, 266 p.

      [11] Zhaivoronok V. V. Znaky ukrainskoi etnokultury: slovnyk-dovidnyk.Kyiv : Dovira, 2006, 703 p.

      [12] Kalashnyk V. S. Studii z istorii ukrainskoho movoznavstva ta linhvopoetyky: zb. nauk. prats. Kharkiv : KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 2016, 132 p.

      [13] Kononenko V. I. Mova i narodna kultura. Movoznavstvo. 2001, № 3, pp. 62–69.

      [14] Kononenko V. I. Mova u konteksti kultury : monohrafiia. Kyiv ; Ivano-Frankivsk: “Plai†TsIT PNU, 2008, 390 p.

      [15] Kosmeda T. A. Movna svidomist i semantyka movy (na prykladi kontseptu VOLIa v teksti T. Shevchenka). Semantyka movy i tekstu : zb. st. VI Mizhnar. nauk. konf. (26-28 veresnia 2000 r.). Ivano-Frankivsk : Plai, 2000, p. 263.

      [16] Kostomarov M. I. Slovianska mifolohiia / uporiad., prymit. I. P. Betko, A. M. Polotai; vstupna st. M. T. Yatsenka. Kyiv: Lybid, 1994, 384 p.

      [17] Lebedenko Yu. M.Frazeosemantychna hrupa z komponentom “khata†v ukrainskii movi: strukturno-semantychnyi ta etnokulturnyi aspekty : avtoref. dys. … kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.01.Kharkiv, 2006, 20 p.

      [18] Maslo O. V. Linhvomentalnyi aspekt ukrainskoi narodnoi kazky. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Filolohiia. 2011, Vyp. 61, pp. 12–15.

      [19] Matsko O. Linhvokulturema “orel†u poetychnii tvorchosti Tarasa Shevchenka. Shevchenkoznavchi studii. 2013, Vyp. 16, pp. 233–240.

      [20] Prysiazhniuk V. Z. Budynok, dim, khata.Kultura slova. 1986. Vyp. 31, pp 80–82.

      [21] Radziievska T. Narysy z kontseptualnoho analizu ta linhvistyky tekstu : tekst–sotsium–kultura–movna osobystist. Kyiv : Inform.-analit. ahenstvo, 2010. 491 p.

      [22] Savchenko L. H., Titomir V. Leksyko-semantychne pole dim u poetychnii movi Vasylia Herasymiuka. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Filolohiia. 2011. Vyp. 61, pp. 24–28.

      [23] Sverdan T., Sverdan M. Kontsept KhATA u tvorchosti Yu. Fedkovycha. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetsoho universytetu. Slovianska filolohiia. Chernivtsi, 2005. Vyp. 274/275, pp. 474–480.

      [24] Sverdan T., Maliar I. Symvoliko-semantychnyi prostir slova “khata†v ukrainskii frazeolohii. Dyvoslovo: Ukrainska mova y literatura v navchalnykh zakladakh. 2008. № 3, pp. 29–32.

      [25] Selivanova O. O. Suchasna linhvistyka: napriamy ta problemy: pidruchnyk. Poltava; Kyiv, 2008. 712 p.

      [26] Skab M. Kontseptualizatsiia sakralnoi sfery v ukrainskii movi : dys. ... doktora filol. nauk: 10.02.01 / Instytut ukrainskoi movy NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv, 2009. 620 p.

      [27] Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tt. / za red. I. K. Bilodida; AN URSR. Instytut movoznavstva. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1970–1980.

      [28] Slukhai N. V. Svit sakralnoho slova Tarasa Shevchenka : monohrafiia.2-he vyd., pererobl. ta dopovn. Kyiv : Kyivskyi universytet, 2014. 224 p.

      [29] Sovtys N. M. Ukrainsko-polskyi linhvokulturnyi dialoh u tvorakh L. H. Venhlinskoho: dys. … doktora filol. nauk : 10.02.01. Kyiv, 2015. 387 p.

      [30] Tomahin G. D. Leksika s kulturnyim komponentom znacheniya. Inostrannyie yazyiki v shkole. 1980. № 6, pp. 47–50.

      [31] Ukrainska mynuvshyna. Iliustrovanyi etnohrafichnyi dovidnyk/A. P. Ponomarov ta in.2-e vyd. Kyiv : Lybid,1994. 256 p.

      [32] Shlenova M. Slovo v poetychnykh tekstakh V. Holoborodka v konteksti tvorchosti poetiv Donbasu: avtoref.dys. … kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.01. Kharkiv, 2016. 21 p.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Cherednyk, L., Shevchenko, E., & Bondar, N. (2018). National Unique Features of The Country House Concept. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 735-740. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27450

    Received date: 2019-02-15

    Accepted date: 2019-02-15

    Published date: 2018-10-13