Stylistic Issues of Modern Dental Scientific Discourse
-
2018-10-13 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27452 -
Use about five key words or phrases in alphabetical order, Separated by Semicolon. -
Abstract
The article provides an attempt to reveal and analyze main stylistic issues of scientific dental discourse. As a result of reviewing theoretical and methodological basics of standardizing the language of science and studying discourse fragments, the current state of observing usual word use norms in the course of writing dental scientific discourse texts in different genres: original abstracts, articles, manuals, textbooks, monographs, etc. has been investigated. In addition, the article characterizes cases of incorrect and irrelevant use of language units in professional texts in the dental field and justifies the analysis of dental scientific language correspondence to the basic communicative features of the language. The importance of correct interpretation of scientific facts, modern theories and hypotheses is pointed out. It is also noted that the skillful usage of professional terms is a daily duty of every qualified specialist. The general scientific (induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, observation, comparison, generalization) and linguistic methods and techniques were used in this scientific work. There was also indicated on irregularity of the professional language of the dental industry. In the article, there were provided arguments and reasonableness for preferred usage of the Ukrainian terms. There was also given a number of national equivalents to the foreign words from the sphere of dentistry.
Â
Â
-
References
Barish IA, Etnolingvistichni aspekti naukovoyi komunikatsiyi, Movoznavstvo, №1, (2000), рр. 21-31.
[2] Ginzburg MD, Sintaksichni konstruktsiyi u fahovih tekstah : praktichni visnovki z rekomendatsiy movoznavtsiv, Visnik Nats. un-tu «Lvivska politehnika», Seriya «Problemi ukrayinskoyi terminologiyi», № 620, (2008), рр. 26-32.
[3] Green DW, Individual variability and neuroplastic changes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5 (35), (2014), pp. 910-912.
https://doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000228
[4] Zelinska NV, Yakiy vin, naukoviy stilі, Kultura slova, №38 (1990), рр. 13-17.
[5] Koval AP, Naukoviy stil suchasnoy iukrayinskoyi literaturnoyi movi : struktura naukovogo tekstu. Kyiv, Vid-vo Kiyiv. un-tu, (1970), 308 р.
[6] Kochan IM, Ukrayinska naukova leksika: mizhnarodni komponenti v terminologii, Kyiv, Znannya, (2013), 294 р.
[7] Kurilo O. Uvagi do suchasnoyi ukrayinskoyi literaturnoyi movi, Kyiv, Osnovi, (2004), 303 р.
[8] Lavrinets OY, Pasivni konstruktsiyi zdih slovami na – syata predikativnimi formami na -no, -to v suchasniy ukraninskiy naukoviy movi : struktura, semantika, status, Movni i kontseptualni kartini svitu, Vip. 50 (1), (2014), р. 432-441.
[9] LeschenkoTO, Ukrayinska mova v meditsini, Poltava, ASMI, (2017), 258 р.
[10] Leshchenko TO, «Aktualni pytannia vnormovanosti terminosystemy ortopedychnoi stomatolohii u formuvanni profesiiny khkompetentsii na pisliadyplomnomu etapi osvity», II Vseukrainskа nauk.-prakt. konf. z mizhnarodnoi uuchastiu «Aktualni pytannia linhvistyky, profesiinoi linhvodydaktyky, psykholohii i pedahohiky v yshchoishkoly», Poltava, (2017), pp. 139-144.
[11] Leschenko TO, Stilistichna samobutnisti i vnormovanist movnih zasobiv naukovogo tekstu yak determinant yakosti naukovoyi statti, Vіsnik problem bіologiyi i meditsini, Vip.1, (127), (2013), р 140-146.
[12] Litvinenko NP, Tlumachniy slovnik medichnih terminiv : ros., lat. ta ukr. movami :dlyalikarIv, naukovtsiv, stud. med. navch. Zakl., Kyiv, Irpin, VTF Perun, (2010), 848 р.
[13] Matsko LI, Stilistika ukrayinskoyi movi, Kyiv, Vischashk., (2003), 462 р.
[14] Misnik NV, Formuvannya ukrayinskoyi medichnoyi klinichnoyi terminologiyi : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.01 /. In-t ukrayinskoyi movi. Kyiv, DUM, (2002), 20 р.
[15] Nepiyvoda NF, Interaktivna stilistika. Stil i tekst. Vip. 4, 2003), рр. 6-18.
[16] Nepiyvoda NF. Pro odin iz shlyahiv udoskonalennya naukovogo stilyu ukrayinskoyi movi, Ukrayinska mova : Z minulogo v maybutne, Kyiv, (1998), рр. 156-158.
[17] Pilinskiy MM, Movna norma i stil, Kyiv, Nauk. dumka, (1976), 288 р.
[18] Purig LA, Suchasni realiyi tvorennya, udoskonalennya, spriynyattya i vikoristannya ukrayinskoyi medichnoyi terminologiyi, Ukrayinska terminologiya i suchasnist, Kiyiv, NAN Ukrayini, (1997), р. 32-33.
[19] Radzievskaya TV, Nauchnyiy tekst kak predstavitel osobogo tipa kommunikatsii, Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informatsiya, Informatsionnyie protsessyi i sistemyi, №10 (1984), рр. 1-6.
[20] Ridneva LY, Narodna medichna leksika rosiyskoyi movi, Uman, Vizavi,( 2013), 182 р.
[21] Saarni SI, Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: An empirical study. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, №4 (27), (2011), рр. 305-312.
https://doi: 10.1017/S026646231100044
[22] Samolisova OV, Ponyattya «terminologiya» ta deyaki aspekti ukrayinskogo medichnogo terminotvorennya. Ukrayinska terminologiya i suchasnist, Vip. 6, (2005), рр. 201-204.
[23] Seligey PO, Do problemi komunikativnih yakostey naukovogo movlennya, Mova, №25, (2016), р. 11.
[24] Seligey PO. Naukoviy zhargon ochima pismennikiv i filosofiv, Movoznavstvo, (2012), № 5, рр. 53-67.
[25] Seligey PO, Ukrainskiy naukoviy tekst : problem komunikativnoyi povnotsinnosti ta stilovoyi doskonalosti : avtoref. disert.… doktora filol. nauk : 10.02.01 / Institut movoznavstva im. O. O. PotebnI NAN Ukrayini, Kiyiv, (2016), 36 р.
[26] Semenog OM, Kultura naukovoyi ukrayinskoyi movi, Kyiv, Akademiya, (2010), 215 р.
[27] Ternovska TP, Do problemi ekspresivnosti naukovogo movlennya, Visn. Lugansk. Derzhped. un-tuim. T. G. Shevchenka, Ser.: Filologichni nauki, № 3 (2013), рр. 134-140.
[28] Tkach AV, MedichnI termini-slovospoluchennya : struktura ta osoblivosti funktsionuvannya, Movoznavchiy visnik. №.18, (2016), рр. 102-107.
[29] Shanina OS, Medychnyi dyskurs: komunikatyvno-prahmatychnyi i suhestyvnyi aspekty : dys. nazdob. nauk. st. kand. filol. nauk, Odessa, (2015), 254 p.
[30] Scherba LV, Yazyikovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatelnost. Lviv, Nauka, (1974), рр. 24-39.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Astahova, S., Leshchenko, T., Zhovnir, M., & Shekhavtsova, S. (2018). Stylistic Issues of Modern Dental Scientific Discourse. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 745-749. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27452Received date: 2019-02-15
Accepted date: 2019-02-15
Published date: 2018-10-13