Altered EPS Protein Secretion in Salmonella Typhimurium Biofilm Following Treatment with DMSO
-
2019-12-24 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.14.27472 -
Biofilm, Salmonella typhimurium, dimethyl sulfoxide, extracellular polymeric substances, protein secretion -
Abstract
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is known to inhibit biofilm formation by Salmonella typhimurium and cause infrared spectral variations of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix. However, the impact of DMSO treatment on EPS protein secretion in S. typhimurium biofilm remains not well investigated. The present study was performed to investigate the EPS protein profile of S. typhimurium biofilm following treatment with DMSO. Biofilm was developed in 6-well microplate at 37 OC for 24 hours. Quantitative resazurin assay and infrared spectroscopy were performed to determine biofilm viability and cell surface chemistry respectively. Subtractive EPS protein profiling was carried out using a combination of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry. Treatment with 32% DMSO caused significant reduction in biofilm viability and alteration of cell surface chemistry. Subtractive comparison of EPS protein profiles highlighted one unique protein band, 52.1 kDa, which was secreted only in 32% DMSO treated EPS matrix and not in control EPS matrix. In turn, three EPS proteins were successfully identified from the 51.2 kDa protein band. In conclusion, altered EPS protein secretion following treatment with 32% DMSO may mediate inhibition of S. typhimurium biofilm.
 Â
-
References
[1] Giaouris E, Samoilis G, Chorianopoulos N, Ercolini D & Nychas GJ (2013), Differential protein expression patterns between planktonic and biofilm cells of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 on stainless steel surface. Int J Food Microbiol 162(1), 105–113.
[2] Entcheva-Dimitrov P & Spormann AM (2004), Dynamics and control of biofilms of the oligotrophic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 186(24), 8254–8266.
[3] Karatan E & Watnick P (2009), Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73(2), 310–347.
[4] Poppe C, Smart N, Khakhria R, Johnson W, Spika J & Prescott J (1998), Salmonella typhimurium DT104: a virulent and drug resistant pathogen. Can Vet J 39(9), 559–565.
[5] Yahya MFZR, Alias Z & Karsani SA (2018), Antibiofilm activity and mode of action of DMSO alone and its combination with afatinib against Gram-negative pathogens. Folia Microbiologica 63(1), 23-30.
[6] Yahya MFZR, Alias Z & Karsani SA (2017), Subtractive protein profiling of Salmonella typhimurium biofilm treated with DMSO. The Protein Journal 36(4), 286-298.
[7] Jacob SW & de la Torre JC (2015), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in trauma and disease. CRC Press, Florida.
[8] Sheng GP, Yu HQ & Li XY (2010), Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review. Biotechnology Advances 28, 882-894.
[9] An D & Parsek MR (2007), The promise and peril of transcriptional profiling in biofilm communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 10, 292–296.
[10] Yahya MFZR, Ibrahim MSA & Hamid UMA (2014), Electrophoretic protein separation reveals the possible antibiofilm mechanism of Chromolaena odorata chloroform extract against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 8 (2), 55-61.
[11] Aksakal A (2010), Analysis of whole cell protein profiles of Salmonella serovars isolated from chicken, turkey and sheep faeces by SDS-PAGE. Vet Med 55(6), 259–263.
[12] Sela S, Yogev D, Razin S. & Bercovier H. (1989), Duplication of the tuf gene: a new insight into the phylogeny of eubacteria. J Bacteriol (171), 581–584.
[13] Coldham NG, Randall LP, Piddock LJV & Woodward MJ (2006), Effect of fluoroquinolone exposure on the proteome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (58), 1145–1153.
[14] Cho Y & Ahn J. (2014), Physiological and molecular responses of antibiotic resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to acid stress. African Journal of Microbiology Research 8(6), 578-589.
[15] Chiba A, Sugimoto S, Sato F, Hori S & Mizunoe Y (2015), A refined technique for extraction of extracellular matrices from bacterial biofilms and its applicability. Microbial Biotechnology 8(3), 392-403.
[16] Jeong H, Mason S, Barabasi A, & Oltvai Z (2001), Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42.
[17] Butland G, PeregrÃn-Alvarez JM, Li J, Yang W, Yang X, Canadien V, ……Emili A. (2005), Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531-537.
[18] Moorthy S & Watnick PI (2004), Genetic evidence that the Vibrio cholerae monolayer is a distinct stage in biofilm development. Molecular Microbiology 52, 573-587.
[19] Ojeda JJ, Romero-Gonzalez ME, Pouran HM & Banwart SA (2008), In situ monitoring of the biofilm formation of Pseudomonas putida on hematite using flow cell ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to investigate the formation of inner-sphere bonds between the bacteria and the mineral. Minerological Magazine 72(1), 101-106.
[20] Yahya MFZR, Saifuddin NFHA & Hamid UMA (2013). Zingiber officinale ethanolic extract inhibits formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. Int J Pharm Biol Sci, 3, 46-54.
[21] Yahya MFZR, Ibrahim MSA, Zawawi WMAWM & Hamid UMA (2014). Biofilm killing effects of Chromolaena odorata extracts against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Research Journal of Phytochemistry 8, 64-73.
[22] Yahya MFZR, Hamid UMA, Norfatimah MY & Kambol R (2014). In silico analysis of essential tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes from biofilm-forming bacteria. Trends in Bioinformatics 7, 19-26.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
F Z Raja Yahya, M., Alias, Z., & A Karsani, S. (2019). Altered EPS Protein Secretion in Salmonella Typhimurium Biofilm Following Treatment with DMSO. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.14), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.14.27472Received date: 2019-02-15
Accepted date: 2019-02-15
Published date: 2019-12-24