Workplace Deviant Behavior among Malaysia hotel Employees. Does organizational Factors Matter?

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    This study aims to develop a theoretical model of the determinants of workplace deviant behaviour among Malaysia hotel employees. From our extensive reviews, we found that organisational-related factors are potential in predicting hotel employee’s deviant behaviour.  We established that organisational justice, trust in management, work autonomy, organisational constraint and organisational ethical climate as the organisational-related factors potential to influence deviant behaviour.  Practical involvements of HR professionals were recommended to support organisation in eradicating deviant behaviour at workplace.  

     

     


  • Keywords


    Workplace Deviant Behavior, Organisational Justice, Trust in Management, Work Autonomy, Organisational Constraint, Organisational Ethical Climate

  • References


      [1] Shamsuddin FM. Workplace Deviance Among Hotel Employees : An Exploratory Survey. Malaysian Manag J 7: 17–33, 2003.

      [2] Abdul Rahman, A. R. Predictors of workplace deviance behavior in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2008.

      [3] Alias M, Mohd Rasdi R, Ismail M, Abu Samah B. Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. Eur J Train Dev 37: 161–182, 2013.

      [4] Shim, J. Concept exploration of workplace incivility: Its Implication to HRD. Retrieved from http://www.midwestacademy.org/Proceedings/2008/papers/Shim&Park_49.pdf, 2008.

      [5] Gonthier, G. RUDE Awakenings: Overcoming the Civility Crisis in the Workplace. Dearborn Trade Publishing, 2003.

      [6] Bennett RJ, Robinson SL. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J Appl Psychol 85: 349–360, 2000.

      [7] Appelbaum SH, Iaconi GD, Matousek A. Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 7: 586–598, 2007.

      [8] Jacobson, K. J. L. Contextual and Individual Predictors of counterproductive work behaviours. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University, 2009.

      [9] Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, A. L., & Murray, M. R. Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 599-609, 2004.

      [10] Mount MK, Ilies R, Johnson E. Relationship of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: the Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction. Pers Psychol 59: 591–622, 2006.

      [11] Harris KJ, Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S. An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadersh Q 18: 252–263, 2007.

      [12] Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML. Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs. J Appl Psychol 92: 1159–1168, 2007.

      [13] Azim AMM, Ahmad A, Omar Z, Silong AD. Does Psychological Contract on Work-Family Benefits Improve Employee Commitment? Asian Soc Sci 11: 71–83, 2015.

      [14] Colquitt JA, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Conlon DE, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86: 425–445, 2001.

      [15] Priesemuth M, Arnaud A, Schminke M. Bad Behavior in Groups: The Impact of Overall Justice Climate and Functional Dependence on Counterproductive Work Behavior in Work Units. Gr Organ Manag 38: 230–257, 2013.

      [16] Demir M. Effects of organizational justice, trust and commitment on employees’ deviant behavior. Anatolia 22: 204–221, 2011.

      [17] Chernyak-Hai, L., and Tziner, A. Relationships between counterproductive work behavior, perceived justice and climate, occupational status, and leader-member exchange. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30, 1-12, 2014.

      [18] Davis JH. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust Author ( s ): Roger C . Mayer , James H . Davis and F . David Schoorman Source : The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 20 , No . 3 ( Jul ., 1995 ), pp . 709-734 Published by : Academy of Management Stable UR. 20: 709–734, 1995.

      [19] Robinson SL. Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract. Adm Sci Q 41: 574, 1996.

      [20] Thau S, Crossley C, Bennett RJ, Sczesny S. The relationship between trust, attachment, and antisocial work behaviors. Hum Relations 60: 1155–1178, 2007.

      [21] Marasi S, Cox SS, Bennett RJ. Job embeddedness: is it always a good thing? J Manag Psychol 31: 141–153, 2016.

      [22] Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 3a_Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16: 250–279, 1976.

      [23] Vardi, Y., and E. Weitz. Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.

      [24] Detert JR, Treviño LK, Burris ER, Andiappan M. Managerial Modes of Influence and Counterproductivity in Organizations: A Longitudinal Business-Unit-Level Investigation. J Appl Psychol 92: 993–1005, 2007.

      [25] Brink, A. G., Emerson, D. J., and Yang, L. Work autonomy and Counterproductive Behaviors in Chinese Accountants: The Role of Job-Related Attitudes. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15, 115-131, 2016.

      [26] Breaugh JA. Further Investigation of the Work Autonomy Scales: Two Studies. J Bus Psychol 13: 357–373, 1999

      [27] Peters LH, O’Connor EJ, Eulberg JR, Watson TW. An Examination of Situational Constraints in Air Force Work Settings. Hum Perform 1: 133–144, 1988.

      [28] Naumann CL, Adkins SE. Situational constraints on the achievement - performance relationship : a service sector study. J Organ Behav 22: 453–465, 2001.

      [29] Sonnentag, S. and Starzyk, A. Perceived prosocial impact, perceived situational constraints, and proactive work behavior: Looking at two distinct affective pathways, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), 806-824, 2015.

      [30] Kim MY, Miao Q, Park SM. Exploring the relationship between ethical climate and behavioral outcomes in the Chinese Public Sector : The mediating roles of affective and cognitive responses. Int J Business, Humanit Technol 5: 88–103, 2015.

      [31] Akgunduz Y. The influence of self-esteem and role stress on job performance in hotel businesses. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 27: 1082–1099, 2015.

      [32] Kao FH, Cheng BS, Kuo CC, Huang MP. Stressors, withdrawal, and sabotage in frontline employees: The moderating effects of caring and service climates. J Occup Organ Psychol 87: 755–780, 2014.

      [33] Shoss MK, Hunter EM, Penney LM. Avoiding the issue: Disengagement coping style and the personality–CWB link. Hum Perform 29: 106–122, 2016.

      [34] Victor, B. and Cullen, J. B. A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 9, 51-71, 1987.

      [35] Lee SH, Ha-Brookshire J. Ethical climate and job attitude in fashion retail employees’ turnover intention, and perceived organizational sustainability performance: A cross-sectional study. Sustain 9, 2017.

      [36] Constantin, E. C. (2010). Ethics and individual behavior. Professional Communication and Trans Stud, 3: 15-18, 2010

      [37] Appelbaum SH, Deguire KJ, Lay M, Appelbaum SH, Deguire KJ, Lay M. The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 5, 43-55, 2005.

      [38] Robinson SL, Bennett RJ. a Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: a Multidimensional Scaling Study. Acad Manag J 38: 555–572, 1995.

      [39] Deshpande, S. P., George, E., & Joseph, J. Ethical climates and managerial success in Russian organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2), 211-217, 2000.

      [40] Fritzsche DJ. Ethical Climates and the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making. J Bus Ethics 24: 125–140, 2000.

      [41] Wimbush JC, Shepard JM, Jon M. Toward An Understanding Climate : Behavior of Ethical Behavior and Supervisory Influence. J Bus Ethics 13: 637–647, 1994.

      [42] Jacobson, K. J. L. Contextual and Individual Predictors of counterproductive work behaviours. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University, 2009.

      [43] Bartlett JE, Bartlett ME. Workplace bullying: An integrative literature review. Adv Dev Hum Resour 13: 69–84, 2011.

      [44] Smithikrai C. Moderating effect of situational strength on the relationship between personality traits and counterproductive work behaviour. Asian J Soc Psychol 11: 253–263, 2008.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 27617
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.27617




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.