Measuring the Level of Defect Condition in the Museum Building

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Assessment of buildings is one of the main components that are essential to assess the condition of the building. Without evaluation, it is difficult to determine the current condition of a heritage building, so failure to check can contribute to future assets. The objective of this study is to assess the level of defect condition in a heritage building. This study has selected nine buildings of the museum as a place of study. The location of the museum building is located in three states of Kelantan, Terengganu, and Pahang. All of the museum buildings have been implemented by using Building Defect Assessment (BDA) and used as a survey tool to assess the level of disability at museum building. Defects of each element in the building of the museum have been recorded.  As a result of the BDA suggests that score full points used to provide the level of evaluating the overall condition of the museum building is good, and the need for action to maintenance requirements such as monitoring, repair, a replacement for preventing defects or serious damage.

     


  • Keywords


    Measuring, building condition, physical element, heritage museum

  • References


      [1] Idid SZA, (1995). Pemeliharaan warisan rupa bandar: panduan mengenali warisan rupa bandar berasaskan inventori bangunan warisan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Badan Warisan Malaysia.

      [2] Ahmad AG, 1997: British Colonial Architecture In Malaysia: 1800-1930. Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Muzium Malaysia.

      [3] Hamilton B. & Ali ZM (2002). BS role in conservation works. 2nd. National Conference on Building Control, Petaling Jaya

      [4] Hobson, E. (2004). Conservation and planning. Spoon Press, London.

      [5] Ashurst, J. (2006). Conservation of ruins. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

      [6] Zuraidi SNF, Akasah ZA & Rahman MAA (2017), Current issues and challenges of the future in heritage building maintenance at Malaysia: Literature review, Vol. 1(4), Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture, and Business, pp. 13-21.

      [7] Rahman MAA, Akasah ZA & Zuraidi SNF (2012), Analisis tren semasa demografi personel penyenggaraan bangunan warisan di Malaysia. Vol. 2(2), Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, pp. 29-37.

      [8] Zuraidi SNF, Akasah ZA & Rahman MAA (2017), Important criteria for measuring heritage building condition. Vol. 2(3), Journal of Built Environment, Technology, and Engineering, pp. 79-83.

      [9] Zuraidi SNF, Akasah ZA & Rahman MAA (2017), Measuring the important element of defects in the heritage building. Vol. 1(4), Journal of Information System and Technology Management, pp. 13-21.

      [10] Zuraidi SNF, Akasah ZA & Rahman MAA (2017), Kriteria penting untuk mengukur keadaan bangunan warisan. Vol. 1(1), Jurnal Sains Sosial, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 92-102.

      [11] Rahman MAA, Akasah ZA & Zuraidi SNF (2012), The importance of on-going maintenance in preserving the heritage listed buildings. Vol. 2(2), International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, pp. 196-198.

      [12] Akasah, ZA, Rahman MAA, & Zuraidi, SNF, (2011). Maintenance management success factors for heritage building: A framework. Vol. 118, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, pp. 653-658.

      [13] Abdul Lateef OA, Khamidi MF, dan Idrus A. (2011) Appraisal of the building maintenance management practices of Malaysian universities. Journal of Building Appraisal. pp. 261-275.

      [14] Myeda NE, Kamaruzzaman SN & Pitt M, (2011) "Measuring the performance of office buildings maintenance management in Malaysia", Vol. 9 (3), Journal of Facilities Management, pp.181-199.

      [15] Mazlan EM, Che-Ani AI, Sarman AM, & Tawil NM. (2018). Analisa faktor kecacatan pada usia bangunan masjid terapung: aplikasi matriks condition survey protocol (CSP) 1. Vol. 10(1), Journal of Design+ Built, pp. 9-17.

      [16] GAO (2011) Opportunities to reduce potential duplication in government programs, save tax dollars, and enhance revenue. Report to Congressional Addressees. United States Government Accountability Office. Mac 2011.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 27692
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.14.27692




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.