Comparison analysis of MANET routing protocols to identify their suitability in smart environment
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.27945 -
ADHOC, AODV, DSR, DSDV, MANET, TORA. -
Abstract
Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a temporary structure; it is self-adjustable, random network without any topology. MANET is guiding in varied area of smart environment and applications to deal with the issues faced by individuals in daily life. Routing is a very interesting research area in mobile networks. Many researchers have come up with their opinion but it is very difficult to say which protocol performs best in different network scenarios such as more overload, increasing load density, etc. This paper highlights different categories of protocols and also provides a performance comparison of these protocols, and tries to suggest which protocol may perform best in a large network. Several routing protocols are compared with respect to Routing Approaches, Routing Table, Route Selection, Route Discovery, Route Maintenance, Protocol Type, Operation, Advantages, Disadvantages, etc. By looking at performance characteristics and metrics of all categories of routing protocols, a number of conclusions can be drawn for each category that may help the researchers.
Â
-
References
[1] Royer, E. M. & Toh, C.-K. A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. Pers. Commun. IEEE 6, 46–55, (1999), http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=760423&isnumber=16455.
[2] Saeed, N. H., Abbod, M. F. & Al-Raweshidy, H. S. MANET routing protocols taxonomy. 2012 Int. Conf. Futur. Commun. Networks 123–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFCN.2012.6206854.
[3] Mohseni, S., Hassan, R., Patel, A. & Razali, R. Comparative review study of reactive and proactive routing protocols in MANETs. 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Digit. Ecosyst. Technol. (IEEE DEST) 304–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2010.5610631.
[4] Mbarushimana, C. & Shahrabi, A. Comparative study of reactive and proactive routing protocols performance in mobile ad hoc networks. 21st Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. Work. (AINAW ’07) 679–684 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/AINAW.2007.123.
[5] E. Perkins, C. & Bhagwat, P. Highly Dynamic ( DSDV ) for Mobile Computers Routing. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM94, London, UK 234–244 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/190314.190336.
[6] Mohapatra, S. & Kanungo, P. Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator. Procedia Eng. 30, 69–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.835.
[7] Naski, S. Performance of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols : Characteristics and Comparison. Ad Hoc Networks (2005).
[8] Al-Maashri, A. & Ould-Khaoua, M. Performance analysis of MANET routing protocols in the presence of self-similar traffic. Proc. - Conf. Local Comput. Networks, LCN 801–807 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2006.322040.
[9] Murthy, S. & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. A routing protocol for packet radio networks. Proc. 1st Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Netw. 86–95 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/215530.215560.
[10] Chen, T.-W. C. T.-W. & Gerla, M. Global state routing: a new routing scheme for ad-hoc wirelessnnetworks. ICC ’98. 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Conf. Rec. Affil. with SUPERCOMM’98 (Cat. No.98CH36220) 1, (1998). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=682615&isnumber=14985.
[11] Pei, G., Gerla, M. & Chen, T.-W. Fisheye State Routing: A Routing Scheme for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. 1, 70–74 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2000.853066.
[12] Jacquet, P. et al. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks To cite this version : Present. IEEE Int. Multi Top. Conf. (INMIC), Lahore Univ. Manag. Sci. 62–68 (2001). https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00471622
[13] M. Poonam, Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: An Overview". International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), June 2017, V48 (3):123-127, ISSN: 2231-2803. Www.ijcttjournal.org. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.
[14] Singh Roy, S. & Zade, P. L. Performance Optimization of Ad Hoc on Demand Vector Routing Protocol in Cognitive Radio Network. Int. J. Wirel. Microw. Technol. 8, 23–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijwmt.2018.03.03.
[15] Chaudhary, R. & Ragiri, P. R. Implementation and Analysis of Blackhole Attack in AODV Routing Protocol. Proc. Second Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Compet. Strateg. - ICTCS ’16 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905172.
[16] Liu, S., Yang, Y. & Wang, W. Research of AODV Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks1. AASRI Procedia 5, 21–31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasri.2013.10.054.
[17] Johnson, D. & Maltz, D. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4. Vasa 1–107 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc4728.
[18] Rahman, M., Anwar, F., Naeem, J., Abedin, M. & Minhazul, S. A simulation based performance comparison of routing protocol on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (proactive, reactive and hybrid). Comput. Commun. Eng. (ICCCE), 2010 Int. Conf. 1–5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2010.5556751.
[19] Corson, M. S. & Ephremides, A. A distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. Wirel. Networks 1, 61–81 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01196259.
[20] Park, V. & Corson, M. A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. … Annu. Jt. Conf. IEEE … 1405–1413 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.1997.631180.
[21] Toh, C.-K. A Novel Distributed Routing Protocol To Support Ad-Hoc Mobile Computing. Conf. Proc. 1996 IEEE Fifteenth Annu. Int. Phoenix Conf. Comput. Commun. 480–486 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.1996.493675.
[22] Yu, J., Qi, Y., Wang, G. & Gu, X. A cluster-based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with nonuniform node distribution. AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun. 66, 54–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2011.05.002.
[23] Mohammed, F., Badr, C. & Abdellah, E. Comparative study of routing protocols in MANET. Int. Conf. Next Gener. Networks Serv. NGNS 149–153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/NGNS.2014.6990244.
[24] Abdulleh, M. N., Yussof, S. & Jassim, H. S. Comparative Study of Proactive , Reactive and Geographical MANET Routing Protocols. 125–137 (2015). Communications and Network, 2015, 7, 125-137, https://doi.org/10.4236/cn.2015.72012.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Devi, M., & Singh Gill, N. (2018). Comparison analysis of MANET routing protocols to identify their suitability in smart environment. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 4844-4849. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.27945Received date: 2019-02-26
Accepted date: 2019-02-26