Analytical Nominations Structural-Semantic Features in the Engineering Technology Field

  • Authors

    • Lilia Lilia
    • Ludmyla Derevyanko
    • Olha Mizina
    2018-10-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.28128
  • analytical, analytical terms, semantic structure, technological processes terminology.

  • Abstract

    Nominating special concepts method by means of analytical terminology belongs to the most active and most productive in the field of engineering technologies, taking into account the specificity of scientific knowledge, which is constantly expanding and replenishing. Analytical terms are subject to internal language laws and general-language influences, reflecting the general tendencies in modern Ukrainian literary language development. Analytical terms by structure type are divided into simple and complex. The highest productivity is marked by two-part analytical terms. In the analyzed constructions, the onomassiological basis is a nuclear component expressed by a noun in the nominal case. Onomasiological sign specifies and detailies the nuclear component meaning. Terminological constructions, having three or more components, are formed by expanding and specifying base component values. Analytic term grammatical and semantic structures are closely interrelated. Terminology unit semantic unity degree depends on the presence or absence of words that are not scientific and technical terms in its composition. Semantic unity increases if one or more analytic term components are formed by narrowing their meaning, metaphorical or metonymic rethinking of non-special words.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Doroshenko, S., Lysenko A., Tievikova O. (2018). Ukrainian Scientific and Technical Terminology Formation and Development Peculiarities. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (3,2), pp. 539–544, http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14585

      [2] Zahnitko, A. P. (2008). Teoriia suchasnoho syntaksysu. Donetsk: DonNU, 294 p.

      [3] Melchuk, Y. A. (1997). Kurs obshchei morfolohyy. Moskva–Vena: “Iazyky russkoi kulturyâ€, Wiener Slavistischer Almanach, pp. 334–335.â€, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2013.2248651

      [4] Rosiisko-ukrainskyi slovnyk z inzhenernykh tekhnolohii (2004). Uklad.: Hanitkevych M. & Kinash B. Terminohrafichna seriia SlovoSvit, â„– 9. Lviv: LIHA-PRES, SD.

      [5] Koval, A. P. (1970). Naukovyi styl suchasnoi ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy. Struktura naukovoho tekstu. Kyiv, 306 p.

      [6] Ovcharenko, V. M. (1968). Struktura i semantyka naukovo-tekhnichnoho termina. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo Kharkiv. un-ty, 71 p.

      [7] Leichyk, V. M. (1994). Iskhodnye poniatyia, osnovnye polozhenyia, opredelenyia sovremennoho termynovedenyia y termynohrafyy. Vestnyk Kharkovskoho polytekhnycheskoho unyversyteta, № 19(1), pp. 147–180.

      [8] Chuieshkova, O. (2006). Semantychna struktura terminospoluk ekonomichnoi terminosystemy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnikaâ€. Seriia “Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohiiâ€, â„– 559, pp. 156–160.

      [9] Natsionalnyi bank standartyzovanykh naukovo-tekhnichnykh terminiv. DP «Ukrainskyi naukovo-doslidnyi i navchalnyi tsentr problem standartyzatsii, sertyfikatsii ta yakosti», available online: http://www.ukrndnc.org.ua.

      [10] Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (2005). Uklad. i holov. red. V. T. Busel. Kyiv; Irpin : VTF «Perun», 1728 p.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Lilia, L., Derevyanko, L., & Mizina, O. (2018). Analytical Nominations Structural-Semantic Features in the Engineering Technology Field. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 810-814. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.28128

    Received date: 2019-03-03

    Accepted date: 2019-03-03

    Published date: 2018-10-13