Employees’ health related quality of life in medical education provider setting: Does academicians report higher scores?

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    Purpose: The objective of this study was to measure level of health-related quality of life among employees working in medical education provider’s setting and its association with type of jobs as academicians or non-academicians. Approach: A cross sectional study was conducted among employees in a medical education provider’s setting. Study instrument consisted of validated Medical Outcome 36-item Short Form Survey (MOS-36) questionnaire were distributed as online survey form. All employees in the study location were recruited. Significant difference in quality of life scores were compared between job types using chi square and Mann-U Whitney statistical test. Results: A total of 196 employees participated in this study. Majority of them were female employees (59%) with Master degree level of education (20%). Academicians were found to score higher in 6 out of 8 domains measured compared to non-academicians. Significant associations were observed between these 2 groups involving 3 domains which were physical functioning (Difference in scores= 10.0, U=2589, p=0.01), emotional health (Difference in scores= 12.0, U=2496, p=0.01) and general health (Difference in scores=10.0, U=2452, p=0.004) domains. Findings from this study supported existing evidence in literature which revealed that in general, academicians did have higher level of HRQOL when compared with their counterparts. These findings would add to existing but limited knowledge on the HRQOL status of healthy working population; because in the past, majority of previous HRQOL studies were emphasized towards patients’ population or population with special conditions. Conclusion: Future initiatives or strategies by policy makers and employers for ensuring good HRQOL among this healthy working population should focus on improving general, physical and emotional health of their employees.


  • Keywords

    Health related quality of life; Employee; Academician; Medical education; QOL.

  • References

      [1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HRQOL concepts. [Internet] (Accessed November 2018) Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/concept.html.

      [2] RAND Health Care. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).[Internet] (Accessed November 2018) Available at: https://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html.

      [3] Amorin-Woods LG, Parkin-Smith GF, Cascioli V & Kennedy D, “Manual care of residents with spinal pain within a therapeutic community”, The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, Vol.37, No.3, (2016), pp.159-168.

      [4] Overman CL, Kool MB, Da Silva JA & Geenen R, “The prevalence of severe fatigue in rheumatic diseases: an international study”, Clinical rheumatology, Vol.35, No.2, (2016), pp.409-415.

      [5] Klemp JR, Myers JS, Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Khan QJ, Sereika SM & Stanton AL, “Cognitive functioning and quality of life following chemotherapy in pre-and peri-menopausal women with breast cancer”, Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol.26, No.2, (2014), pp.575-583

      [6] Predeger EJ, O'malley M, Hendrix T & Parker NM, “Oncology rehabilitation outcomes over time: a mixed-methods approach”, Oncology nursing forum, Vol.41, No.2, (2014), pp.56-63.

      [7] Fathalla H, Cusimano MD, Alsharif OM & Jing R, “Endoscopic transphenoidal surgery for acromegaly improves quality of life”, Canadian Journal of Neurological Science, Vol.41, No.6, (2014), pp.735-741.

      [8] Suman VB & Chatterjee P, “Psychological and physical well-being in working women”, International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, Vol.4, No.11, (2015), pp.1489-1493.

      [9] Garratt AM & Stavem K, “Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey”, Health and quality of life outcomes, Vol.15, No.51, (2017), pp.1-10.

      [10] Su TT, Azzani M, Adewale AP, Thangiah N, Zainol R & Majid H, “Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Low-Income Adults in Metropolitan Kuala Lumpur”, Journal of epidemiology, Vol.29, No.2, (2018), pp.43-49.

      [11] Ware Jr JE & Sherbourne CD, “The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection”, Medical care, Vol.30, No.6, (1992), pp.473-483.

      [12] SPSS I, IBM SPSS Software, United States, (2016).

      [13] Aytaç KY, “Investigating the working life quality and organizational commitment behaviors of academicians carrying on duties in faculties of sports sciences”, European Journal of Education Studies, Vol.3, No.11, (2017), pp.603-627.

      [14] Low SY, et al., “Association Between Urine Uric Acid Levels and Quality of Life in Academicians and Non-academicians in UTAR, Kampar”, International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Sciences, Vol.56, (2015), pp.118-121

      [15] McAbee JH, Ragel BT, McCartney S, Jones GM, Michael LM, DeCuypere M, Cheng JS, Boop FA & Klimo P, “Factors associated with career satisfaction and burnout among US neurosurgeons: results of a nationwide survey”, Journal of neurosurgery, Vol.123, No.1, (2015), pp.161-173.

      [16] Spiotta AM & Turner RD, Quality and safety in neurosurgery, Elsevier Ic, (2018), pp:277-291.




Article ID: 28243
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.1.28243

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.