Dynamic Development as the Way of Entrepreneurship Efficiency Increase

  • Authors

    • Ekaterina G. Shumik
    • Marina N. Arnaut
    • Ksenia V. Smitskikh
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.28341
  • dynamic development of entrepreneurship, model, stakeholders, efficiency, factors, principles, evaluation algorithm.

  • Abstract

    The social and economic development of any territory (region, area, municipality) is conditioned by the diverse factors of internal and external environment: federal and regional development programs, the living standards of population, budget investments, the degree of health system development, the territorial peculiarities and many others. In its turn, the level of entrepreneurship development plays an important role in the process of social and economic development of the territory as one of the activities of a person or a circle of people, within which new jobs are created, tax revenues are increased, the spheres of the territory influence and its interaction with various partners are expanded, including foreign ones, the level of innovative developments is growing, etc. At that, within the framework of the present article, the authors will prove that the process of entrepreneurship development occurring within a particular territory must have a dynamic nature that defines it as the trajectory of entrepreneurial activity long-term growth, accompanied by its significant quantitative changes and mutually conditioned qualitative transformations aimed at population life quality improvement. Also, the authors of the article note that the existing mechanisms and approaches to the development, implementation and evaluation of entrepreneurship dynamic development model do not allow to include all stakeholders in this process effectively. Moreover, many authors do not consider this process at all or consider it from the viewpoint of the cyclical nature concerning the emergence of entrepreneurial activity individual subjects, rather than from the standpoint of entrepreneurship process as a whole. The authors made an attempt to determine the factors that influence the process of entrepreneurship dynamic development: economic and subeconomic (personal qualities of an entrepreneur, etc.); to describe the principles that ensure the dynamic development of entrepreneurship: the transition from the management of entrepreneurship development "from above" to the management "from below", the collective responsibility of all stakeholders, the parity of the relations between the business community and the authorities regulating entrepreneurial activity, ensuring the continuity of generations for the development of long-term entrepreneurial activity, the focus on the scope of business expansion; to describe the model ensuring the dynamic development of entrepreneurship and provide the algorithm for its effectiveness evaluation; to identify stakeholders that directly affect the dynamic development of entrepreneurship and include foreign partners in their composition as the prerequisite ensuring the qualitative functioning of the designated process model and its effectiveness evaluation, taking into account the territorial peculiarities described in the article of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia (FEFD).

     

  • References

    1. [1] Ban Ki-moon H.E. Thematic debate on the "State of the World Economy and Finance in 2012". General Assembly [Electronic resourse]. Electronic resource. Access mode: // URL: http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/05/he-ban-ki-moon-thematic-debate-on-the-state-of-the-world-economy -and-finance-in-2012-general-assembly.html [Reference date 04/03/2018.]

      [2] Birch D. The Job Generation Process. A report prepared by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change for the Economic Development Administration, U.S.

      [3] Yudanov A.Yu. The experience of competition in Russia. The reasons for success and failures. Moscow: KnoRus, 2007. p. 342.

      [4] Lisin G.I. The creation of a dynamically developing entrepreneurial network strategy. The Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Ekaterinburg, 2012.- 25 p.

      [5] Lapidus V.A. Nizhny Novgorod Business Newspaper. â„– 7, May 2009 // Electronic resource. Access mode: httpURL: centr-prioritet.ru/ct/txt/464/. [Reference date: 10.06.2018.]

      [6] Good Business Goal: To Be A High-Impact Firm // Electronic resource. Access Mode URL: www.hrp.org/Site/docs/ResourceLibrary/High-Impact_Firms_Gazelles_Revisited.pdf [Reference date: 10.02.2018.]

      [7] G.B. Kleiner "To evaluate not by goals, but by values" Speech on the report by S.S. Sulakshin, V.E. Bagdasaryan, S.M. Stroganov "Quality and Success of Public Management Policy" // Electronic resource. Access mode: httpURL: kleiner.ru. [Reference date: 10.06.2018.]

      [8] Kondratiev N.D., Yakovets Yu.V., Abalkin L.I. Large cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foresight. Selected works. M.: Economics, 2002. p. 215

      [9] Kuznets S. Economic system by Dr. Schumpeter, presented and criticized; Perlman M. Two phases of Kuznets's interest in Schumpeter / Comp. by the Dr. of Geogr. Sciences, Prof. V.M. Moskovkin, Cand. of history. D.Yu. Mikhailichenko, translated by E.E. Perchik; Ed. by the Dr. of Economy, Prof. V.S. Ponomarenko. "INJEK" Publishing House, 2012. 128 p.

      [10] Kondratiev E.V. System-institutional development of the management personnel of an enterprise: theory and effectiveness [Electronic resource]. URL: http: //www.leanforum.ru/content/content/kniga-monografia_kondratiev.PDF [Reference date: 04.02.2018.]

      [11] Polskaya G.A. Material incentives for labor as the factor of consumer cooperation trade dynamic development. Abstract from Belgorod, 2008. 24 p.

      [12] Ivaschenko A.S. The reasons for the dynamic development of newly industrialized country economy in southeast Asia (1960-ies - the beginning of the 21st century). The voice of the past. Kuban Historical Journal. 2013. V. 3-4. pp. 38-52.

      [13] Zakharova E.N., Martyshina Т.V. Sustainability of development as a key goal of regional management // KANT. № 3 (12). 2014. pp. 4-6.

      [14] Beybalaeva D.K. The problems of dynamic development for territorial-sectoral relations and their structuring in the regional economy. Electronic resource. Access mode URL: www.rppe.ru/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/beybalaeva-d-k.pd [Reference date: 04/05/2018]

      [15] Kharlamova E.E. The theory and the methodology of effective management concerning the dynamic development of an educational organization / Monograph. 2015 Publisher: Volgograd State Technical University (Volgograd). p. 160

      [16] Bekmuhamedova B.U. Dynamic and balanced development of the economy as the indicator of the solid base to raise population life level and quality // BEST SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE 2018. The collection of articles of the 17th International Scientific and Research Contest. Editor in charge: Gulyaev Herman Yuryevich. 2018

      [17] Publisher: MCSC "Nauka i Prosveshchenie" pp. 130-132

      [18] Stolyarenko V.V. The improvement of the business partnership system is the key condition for the dynamic development of hotel service sphere // The collection of scientific articles. L.N. Anisimova (editor in charge); Moscow State Regional University, The Faculty of Technology and Entrepreneurship. Moscow, 2017 Publisher: Moscow State Regional University (Moscow). pp. 89-95

      [19] Azaryan E.M., Kuzmenko R.V. Institutional conditions in the organizational and economic component of industrial region dynamic development generation and dissemination // Bulletin of Economic Research Institute. 2016. Publisher: The Institute for Economic Research (Donetsk). No. 4(4). pp. 60-68.

      [20] Economic theory: political economy. Ed. by Bazilevich V.D. Moscow: Rybary, 2009. - 870 p.

      [21] Principal principles of model creation for the development of regional socio-economic systems. Electronic resource. Access mode URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsipialnye-osnovy-postroeniya-modeley-razvitiya-regionalnyh-sotsialno-ekonomicheskih-sistem. Reference date: June 30, 2013

      [22] Basareva V.G. Institutional features of small business sector development during the period of transformational changes / V.G. Basareva // Region: Economics and Sociology. - 2010. - N 3. - pp. 249-266

      [23] Kaplan R. Strategic maps. Transformation of intangible assets into tangible results: Translation from English. / R. Kaplan, D. Norton. - M.: Olymp-Business, 2005. - 512 p.

      [24] Gurkov I.B. The strategy and the structure of a corporation / I.B. Gurkov. - M.: Delo, 2006. - 320 p.

      [25] Svetnik T.V. Strategic alliances and competitive strategies in foreign business / T.V. Svetnik // Social and economic aspects of business development: Intern. scientific-practical. conf. Irkutsk, 6 April, 2010 - Irkutsk: The Publishing House of Irkutsk State University, 2010. - pp. 280-285.

      [26] Tazhitdinov I.A. The application of the stakeholder approach in the strategic management of territorial development // Economics of the region. 2013. Issue 2 (34)

      [27] Grabar V.V., Salmakov M.M. The analysis of project stakeholders: methodology and tools // ARS Administrandi. Issue 2. 2014.

      [28] Mukhortov E.M. The management of industrial complex strategic development on the basis of the stakeholder approach // The economic journal. Moscow: LLC "Ippolitov Publishing House". V. 28. â„– 4. 2012. pp. 62-70.

      [29] Solodukhin K.S. The development of strategic management methodology by university on the basis of stakeholder theory: dis. by the Dr. of Econ. sciences.

      [30] Rakhmanova M.S. The development of innovative strategic analysis methods of the university on the basis of interested party theory: the dissertation by the candidate of economic sciences, Vladivostok, 2009.

      [31] Khazov O.Yu. Comprehensive assessment of the economic efficiency of enterprises from the standpoint of interested groups: author's abstract. diss. by the cand. of econ. sciences.

      [32] Ralston D.A. et al. Today's State-owned Enterprises of China: Are They Dying Dinosaurs or Dynamic Dynamos? // Strategic Management Journal. 2006. Vol. 27. No. 9. pp. 825-843.

      [33] Liao S., Zhang Y. A New Context for Managing Overseas Direct Investment by Chinese State-Owned Enterprises // China Economic Journal. 2014. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 126-140

      [34] BOCHAROV N.A. STEAKHOLDERS AS THE TOOL OF SOCIAL INTERACTION OF COMPANIES. HERALD OF THE UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT) Publishing House: State University of Management (Moscow). Number: 10; Year: 2015 Pages: 250-254.

      [35] Mendelow A. Stakeholder Mapping, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems. Cambridge, MA, 1991.

      [36] Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Iden-tification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts // Academy of Management Review. 1997. Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 853-888.

      [37] Savage G.T., Nix T.W., Whitehead and Blair. Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders // Academy of Management Executive. 1991. Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 61-75.

      [38] Friedman A., Miles S. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress, 2006.

      [39] Khazov O.Yu. Comprehensive assessment of the economic efficiency of enterprises from the positions of stakeholders. Dis. by the Cand. of econ. sciences. Volgograd. 2006.

      [40] Tarsky M.O., Pershina E.G., Podzorova Galina Anatolievna. Steakholder management as the tool improving the quality of organization management.

      [41] Basheva M.M. The determination of preferred strategic enterprises by interested parties. Diss. by the c. of e.

      [42] Dolmatova I.N. The value of a non-public company: the assessment from the standpoint of stakeholders // Russian Entrepreneurship. 2011. â„– 3 (2). pp. 64-70. 3. Ivashkovskaya I.V. Company value modeling. Strategic responsibility of the boards of directors. M.: Infra-M, 2009. 430 p.

      [43] The analysis of the investment strategy from the standpoint of stakeholder theory. BYCHKOVA S.M., MAKAROVA N.N, Zhidkova E.A. The theory of Accounting, Control and Analytical Processes No. 1/2017, pp. 33-38

      [44] Rowley T. Logical-structural approach and its application for analysis and activity planning [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.libma.ru/nauchnaja_literatura_prochee/logiko_strukturnyi_podhod_i_ego_primenenie_dlja_analiza_i_planirovanija_dejatelnosti/p7.php

      [45] O'Sullivan, R. G., Skaga, J., & Chernow, M. (2005). First 5 Los Angeles Child Care Initiative Evaluation Phase II Final Report. Chapel Hill, NC: Evaluation, Assessment & Policy Connections, School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

      [46] Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B.R. (2004). Program evaluatio, 3rd Edition. Boston: Pearson.

      [47] Rodruguez-Campos, L. (2005). Collaborative evaluations: A step-by-step model for the evaluator. Tamarac, FL: LluminaPress

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    G. Shumik, E., N. Arnaut, M., & V. Smitskikh, K. (2018). Dynamic Development as the Way of Entrepreneurship Efficiency Increase. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 668-677. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.28341

    Received date: 2019-03-13

    Accepted date: 2019-03-13

    Published date: 2018-11-30