Influences of Injection Pressure and Flow Rate to the Green Properties

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Injection moulding is one of the essential processes in Metal injection moulding (MIM). The injection pressure and flow rate are the key factors that influence the quality of the MIM parts. In the present study, experimental work has been performed to identify the influence of injection pressure and flow rate to the surface defects, density and the strength of the green parts. Feedstocks used were water atomised stainless steel powder with a solid loading of 62 %vol and the multicomponent binder consisting PEG, PMMA and strearic acid. Tensile specimens were injection moulded by varying injection pressure from 550 bar to 750 bar and flow rate from 10 cm3/s to 20 cm3/s.  All feedstocks prepared exhibits a shear thinning behaviour. The results show that the green density and green strength decreases as injection pressure increased. The flow rate is directly proportional to the green strength while the green density is unable to correlate with the flow rate. Excess flashing and severe binder separations were observed when the specimens were injection moulded at injection pressure 750 bar and flow rate 20 cm3/s.

     

     

  • Keywords


    Metal injection moulding; injection pressure; flow rate; green density; green strength

  • References


      [1] Mustafa N., Ibrahim MHI, Asmawi R, Aimin AM & Masrol SR (2015), Green Strength Optimization in Metal Injection Molding Applicable with a Taguchi Method L9 (3)4. Applied Mechanics and Materials 773-774, 115-17.

      [2] Khakbiz M, Simchi A & Bagheri R (2005), Analysis of the Rheological Behavior and Stability of 316L Stainless Steel- TiC Powder Injection Moulding feedstock. Materials Science and Engineering A 407, 105–113.

      [3] Barriere T, Liu B & Gelin JC (2003), Determination of the optimal process parameter in metal injection molding from experiment and numerical modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 143-144, 636-644.

      [4] Shahbudin SNA, Othman MH, Aimin SYM & Ibrahim MHI (2017), A Review of Metal Injection Molding- Process, Optimization, Defects and Microwave Sintering on WC-Co Cemented Carbide. Materials Science and Engineering 226 012162, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012162.

      [5] Md Radzi MKF, Sulong AB, Muhamad N & Razak Z (2016), Optimization of injection molding parameters for Kenaf/PP composite using Taguchi method. Advanced Processes and Systems in Manufacturing An International Conference 2016, 121–122.

      [6] Koffi A, Koffi D, Aimin & Toubal L (2016), Injection Molding Parameters Influence on PE Composites Parts. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 12(10), 29–39.

      [7] Sebastian Engström, Metal Injection Molding: A review of the MIM process and its optimization. Arcada UAS, (2017).

      [8] Khairur Rijal Jamaludin, Norhamidi Muhamad, Mohd Nizam Ab. Rahman, SriYulis M. Amin, Shahrir Abdullah & Muhammad Hussain Ismail (2007), Influence of Temperature to the Injection Moulding of Bimodal Powder Mixture. World Engineering Congress 2007, 202-210.

      [9] German RM & Bose A, Injection Molding of Metals and Ceramics. MPIF, (1997).

      [10] Mohd Afian Omar, Injection molding of 316L stainless steel and NiCrSiB alloy powders using a PEG/PMMA binder, University of Sheffield, (1999).

      [11] Muhammad Hussain Ismail, Powder Loading Influence to the Processing Phenomena in Metal Injection Moulding, The National University of Malaysia, (2002).

      [12] Wahi A, Muhamad N, Jamaludin KR, Rajabi J & Madraky A (2012), Optimization of Injection Molding Parameters by Data Mining Method in PIM Process. Jurnal Teknologi 59, 227-232.

      [13] Amin SYM, Muhamad N & Jamaludin KR (2013), Optimization of Injection Molding Parameters for WC-Co Feedstocks. Jurnal Teknologi 63(1), 227-232.

      [14] Murtadhahadi, Injection Parameter for Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) process to make use of feedstock of SS 316L, PEG, PMMA and Stearic Acid, The National University of Malaysia, (2007).

      [15] Norhamidi Muhamad, Muhammad Hussain Ismail, Ahmad Kamal Arifin Mohd Ihsan & Jaafar Sahari. (1999), Processing Parameter of Metal Injection Moulding. Proceeding of Research & Development, Department of Mechanical & Material Engineering, National University of Malaysia, 1999, 143-148.

      [16] Tatt Tan Koon, Muhamad Norhamidi, Muchtar Andanastuti, Sulong Abu Bakar & Yunn Heng Shye (2012), Rheological behavior of novel feedstock for manufacturing porous stainless steel via (MIM)-PSH,” Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) 59(SUPPL.2), 187–191.

      [17] Machaka R, Ndlangamandla P & Seerane M (2018), Capillary rheological studies of 17-4 PH MIM feedstocks prepared using a custom CSIR binder system. Powder Technology 326, 37-43.

      [18] Khairur Rijal Jamaludin, Norhamidi Muhamad, Mohd Nizam Ab. Rahman, Sri Yulis M. Amin, Sufizar Ahmad, Mohd Halim Irwan Ibrahim, Murtadhahadi & Nor Hafiez Mohamad Nor (2008). Influence of Injection Pressure, Injection Temperature, Powder Loading to Green Density: Analysis of Variance. Conference I - AMReG 08, 2008, pp:83-91.

      [19] Amin AM, Ibrahim MHI, Hashim MY, Marwah OMF, Othman M H, Johar MA & Ng CH (2017), Green density optimization of stainless steel powder via metal injection molding by Taguchi method. 8th International Conference on Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering 2017 (ICME’17), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713500038.

      [20] Ibrahim MHI, Muhamad N, Sulong AB, Jamaludin KR, Ahmad S & Nor NHM. (2010). Single Performance Optimization of Micro Metal Injection Molding for the Highest Green Strength by Using Taguchi Method. International Journal of Integrated Engineering (Issue on Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 2010 35-34.

      [21] Sotomayor ME, Várez A & Levenfeld B (2010), Influence of powder particle size distribution on rheological properties of 316L powder injection moulding feedstocks. Powder Technology 32200(1-2) 30-36.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 28844
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v8i1.12.28844




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.