Determinants of UITM Johor students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning system

  • Authors

    • Nurul Aien Binti Abd Aziz
    • Mohd Hafizan Bin Musa
    • Zahirah Binti Hamid Ghul
    • Noreen Noor Binti Abd Aziz
    • Rusnani Binti Mohamad Khalid
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.35.29296
  • E-Learning, Behavioral Intention, Technology Acceptance Model.

  • Recently,there are many universities in Malaysia including local and private implemented and developed an e-learning system for various purpose. Along with the era of using technology, many universities take this opportunity to further develop the e-learning system for using by students as well as an educator. Hence, this research aims to investigate the relationship between Perceived ease of use, perceived Usefulness, Attitude, E-learning self-efficacy and behavioral intention to use e-learning .The structural model was developed based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).223 respondents comprising of UiTM Johor students as a user of e-learning system participated in this survey. Simple random sampling technique was used to measure the Perceived ease of use, perceived Usefulness, Attitude, E-learning self-efficacy and behavioral intention to use e-learning. Pearson correlation was used to measure the relationship between the variables. The results indicate significant relationship between all the independent variable (Perceived ease of use, perceived Usefulness, Attitude, E-learning self-efficacy) with the dependant variable (behavioral intention to use e-learning).Findings from the study would be beneficial to university especially for UiTM and relevant department to keep maintain the system as well as to ensure the system is fully utilized by student and educator as an educational platform.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Ajzen, I., & Fishbein. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

      [2] Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.

      [3] Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1985). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 466–488.

      [4] Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology & Health,15(2),173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400299.

      [5] Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

      [6] Blackwell, D, R., Engel, F., J., Miniard, & W., P. (2016). Consumer Behaviour. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers.

      [7] Collins A, & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

      [8] Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      [9] Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Management, Ph.D., 291. https://doi.org/oclc/56932490.

      [10] Diana, F., Bahry, S., Anwar, N., & Amran, N. (2012). Predicting intended to use of web portal using extended technology acceptance model (TAM): Some perspective on information management students. In SBEIA 2012 - IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (pp. 229–234).

      [11] Eagly, A., & Chaiken S. (1993). The psycology of attitudes. Forth worth, TX, Harcout, Brace, Jovanovich.

      [12] Grandon, E. E., Alshare, K., & Kwun, O. (2005). Factors influencing student intention to adopt online classes: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Computing Sciences in …, 20(4), 46–56. https://doi.org/1047853.

      [13] James Kilmurray. (2003). e-Learning: It’s More Than Automation.

      [14] Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners ’ Perceptions toward the Web-based Distance Learning Activities / Assignments Portion of an Undergraduate Hybrid Instructional Model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 105–113.

      [15] Lee, H. (2006). Creating a Knowledge-Based Society through E-Learning in Korea. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(5), 529–540.

      [16] Mishra, P., & Koehler. (2007). Proceedings from Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the Wicked Problems of Teaching with Technology (p. 2214–2226)).

      [17] Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235.https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542652.

      [18] Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers and Education, 40(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00142-2.

      [19] Shepherd, C., & Mullane, A. M. (2010). Managing Multimedia Mania: Taming the Technology Beast. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(1), 59–70.

      [20] Sumak, B., Hericko, M., Pusnik, M., & Polancic, G. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance and use of moodle: An empirical study based on TAM. Informatica (Ljubljana), 35(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2017010102.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Abd Aziz, N. A. B., Bin Musa, M. H., Ghul, Z. B. H., Abd Aziz, N. N. B., & Khalid, R. B. M. (2018). Determinants of UITM Johor students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.35), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.35.29296