Analysis of Cracks on a Fractured Surface of the Vehicle Crankshaft Using the Finite Element Method
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.29373 -
Finite Element Method, Fatigue Fracture, Crankshaft, Stress, Strain. -
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the cause of fracture of a crankshaft. From visual examination, there was a beach mark on the surface, which is common in fatigue failure due to dynamic load. From the chemical composition testing, it was found that the material is classified into alloy steel. Hardness values of the material are based on the Rockwell method, which account the difference between the hardness values on the sides of the edge with the hardness in the middle part. The highest hardness value occurred on the outer edge of the cross section of the crankshaft on the X and Y axes at points 1 and 14, which was 102.2 HRB. A finite element analysis was per- formed to find out the values of stress, strain and deformation that occurred on the component of the crankshaft while operating. From these results, maximum stress and strain occur in the crank pin radius number 1. Finally, it can be concluded that fractures in the crank- shaft occur for several reasons including fatigue failure, material hardness that is not in accordance with the standard, and initial cracks found in the radius of the area crank pin number 1.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] L. Witek, “Failure and thermo-mechanical stress analysis of the exhaust valve of diesel engineâ€, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol 66 (2016), pp:154–165.
[2] Husaini, Zuhaimi, “Mixed mode fracture behavior of an aluminum alloy a6061 investigated by using compact tension shear specimens†International Journal Of Technology (Ijtech), Vol 3 (2016), pp: 456-462,
[3] Husaini, K. Kishimoto, M. Hanji, M. Notomi, “Investigations of the mixed mode crack growth behavior of an aluminum alloy†ARPN, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol 2 (2016), pp: 885-889.
[4] H. Akhyar, Husaini, Study on colling curve behavior during solidification and investigation of impact strength and hardness of Al-Zn alumunium alloy, International journal of metal casting, Vol 10 (2016), pp: 452-456.
[5] L. Witek, M. Sikora, F. Stachowicz, T. Trzepiecinski, “Stress and failure analysis of the crankshaft of diesel engineâ€, Engineering Failure Analysis Vol 82 (2017), pp:703 – 712 .
[6] M. Fonte, V. Invante. M. Freitas, M. Reis, “failure mode analysis of two diesel engine crank,shaftâ€, Procedia Structural Integrity Vol 1(2016), pp: 313–318 .
[7] M. Fonte, V. Anes, P. Duarte, L. Reis, M. Freita, “Crankshaft failure analysis of a boxer diesel motorâ€, Engineering Failure Analysis Vol 56(2015), pp:109-115.
[8] T. E. Putra, S. Abdullah, D. Schramm, M. Z. Nuawi, T. Bruckmann, “Generating strain signals under consideration of road surface profilesâ€, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol 61(2015), pp: 485-497.
[9] T. E. Putra, S. Abdullah, D. Schramm, M. Z. Nuawi, T. Bruckmann, “Reducing cyclic testing time for components of automotive suspension system utilising the wavelet transform and the Fuzzy C-Meansâ€, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol 90 (2017), pp: 1-14.
[10] Husaini, T. E. Putra, N. Ali, “Fatigue feature clustering of modified automotive strain signals for saving testing timeâ€, International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, Vol 15 (2018) pp: 5251-5272.
[11] ASTM E18–15, Standart Test Method For Rockwell Hardness Of Metallic Materials (ASTM International 2015)
[12] ASTM A 519–9. Standar Spesifikasi For Seamless Carbon And Alloysteel Mechanical Tubing1 (ASTM International. 2001).
[13] F. J. Espadafor, J. B. Villanueva, M. T. Garcia “Analysis of a diesel generator crankshaft failure†Engineering Failure Analysis Vol 16 (2009), pp: 2333-2341.
[14] Azom Materials. AISI 1060 carbon steel (UNS G51600), (2012).
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
., H., E. Putra, T., & ., Z. (2018). Analysis of Cracks on a Fractured Surface of the Vehicle Crankshaft Using the Finite Element Method. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.36), 1564-1568. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.29373Received date: 2019-05-26
Accepted date: 2019-05-26