Measurement and Spatial Analysis of Internal Development Zones in Isfahan Metropolitan Area 3

  • Authors

    • Sirous Shafaghi
    • Reza Mokhtari
    • Malek Abadi
    • Behzad Behmanesh
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.29470
  • Worn texture, internal development, area 3

  • The lack of macro urban development strategies, the growth of worn out texture, dispersed and heterogeneous growth, marginalization, environmental problems, and physical development have created an inappropriate landscape for the metropolis of Isfahan. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to measure the spatial analysis of internal development zones in Isfahan metropolitan area 3. To determine the appropriate internal development zones of the ANP model and its cluster analysis, the nearest neighbor and the Getis-Ord model have been used. The results of the research show that, the areas with a high, low and very low priority for internal development are 97, 91 and 430 hectares, respectively. Hence, about 188 hectares of texture in the 3rd district of Isfahan is prone to internal development. Based on the average method of the nearest neighbor, the distribution pattern of the high priority areas has a z-scoer of 20.85 and p-value with a score of 0.000, which indicates a fully clustered pattern of distribution of these lands at a level of 99% It should be.The conclusion show that priority intervention areas are in the north and center and low priority clusters in the southern part of the region. Therefore, neighborhoods with values above the mean in the center and somewhat in the north and west of the city and neighborhoods have lower values than the mean in the south and east of Isfahan.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Department of Urban Planning and Architecture of Isfahan (1394), Determination of urban poverty sprawl in Isfahan metropolis, in collaboration with Isfahan University, Isfahan.
      Mohammadi, Jamal and Zavareh Bidgoli, Mohammad, (2009), Urban Development of Inhabited Urban Textiles, Sepehr Quarterly, No. 70.

      [2] Mohammadi Hamidi, Simiyeh; Ahnejad Roushti, Mohsen, Mousavi, Mirnegan (1395). Analysis and spatial analysis of distribution and access to urban public services: Case study: Miandoab guidance center, Geographical Space Magazine, 6th year, No. 20, pp. 125-139.

      [3] Meshkini, Abolfazl; Mahdanezhad, Hafiz; Paradise, Shout, (1391), Models of Entropism in Urban Planning, Omid Revolution Publications, First Edition, Tehran.

      [4] Mahdanezhad, Hafez (1394), Spatial Measurement and Analysis of Urban Wide Urals (Case Study: Varamin City), Dissertation for Doctor of Geography and Urban Planning, Professor Mohammad Karamat Allah Ziyar, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran.

      [5] Rhini, Mohammad and Ardestani, Zahra Sadat (2009), Pyramid Reconstruction and People Participation, Evaluation Scale of Urban Development Plans, Urban Identity Journal, Third Year, No. 5, Autumn and Winter.

      [6] Rafieian, Mojtaba, Barati, Naser, Aram, Marziyeh (2009), Measurement of the capacity for developing unused spaces in the city center of Qazvin, with an emphasis on interdisciplinary development approach, Architectural and Urban Planning (Faculty of Art University of Iran), No. 5, p. 61 -45

      [7] Anderson, Connie (2005), Infill Development: Barriers and Incentives, Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency.

      [8] Batisani, Nnyaladzi, Yarnal, Brent (2010), Elasticity of capital-land substitution in housing construction, Gaborone Botswana: Implications for smart growth policy and affordable housing, Landscape and Urban Planning.Denver Regional Council of Governments, (2014),Infill and Redevelopment Issues Paper,Metro Vision 2040 A Program of DRCOG.

      [9] Biddle, Tony; Bertoia, Tony; Greaves, Stephen; Stopher, Peter, (2006), The Costs of Infill versus Greenfield Development – A Review of Recent Literature, 29th Australasian Transport Research Forum.

      [10] Department of Infrastructure Energy and Resources, (2013), Infill development in Hobart,GHD.

      [11] Domus Development, (2014), Infill Development in a Post- Development World,January 2014.

      [12] Listokin, David; Walker,Carole; Ewing, Reid; Cuddy, Matt; Cander, Alan, (2007), Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide, Center for Urban Policy Research.

      [13] Petryhsyn, Luca, (2015), An analysis of best practices used to promote infill development for the City of Edmonton, University of Alberta.

      [14] Schildt, Chris, (2011), Strategies for Fiscally Sustainable Infill Housing, The Center for Community Innovation (CCI) at UC Berkeley.

      [15] United StatesEnvironmental ProtectionAgency(EPA), (2015), Attracting Infill Development in Distressed Communities: 30 Strategies, Office of Sustainable Communities, Smart Growth Program.

      [16] United StatesEnvironmental ProtectionAgency(EPA), (2014),Smart Growth and Economic Success: Investing in Infill Development, Office of Sustainable Communities, Smart Growth Program.

      [17] Wallis, Elizabeth Roberts (2008), Evaluating Infill Development as an Antidote to Sprawl In the Detroit Metropolitan Region, University of Michigan.

      [18] Wegmann, Jake; Nemirow, Alison, (2011), Secondary Units and Urban Infill: A Literature Review,Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development,University of California.

      [19] Wheeler, Stephen M, (2001), Infill Development in the San Francisco Bay Area: Current Obstacles and Responses, A Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Cleveland, Ohio.

      [20] Zhu, Bing (2009), Urban Spatial Expansion Based on “Smart Growth. The 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Shafaghi, S., Mokhtari, R., Abadi, M., & Behmanesh, B. (2018). Measurement and Spatial Analysis of Internal Development Zones in Isfahan Metropolitan Area 3. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.36), 1472-1477. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.29470