Decision support system analysis with the graph model on non-cooperative generic water resource conflicts

  • Authors

    • Ahmed Aljuaidi King Abdulaziz University
    2017-10-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v6i4.7566
  • , water disputes, generic conflict resolution, graph model, decision support systems, and multiple criteria decision analysis.

  • Abstract

    This paper aims to resolve four non-cooperative generic water disputes using the Graph Model approach for conflict resolution. Therefore, a Decision Support System (DSS) has been utilized integrating multiple-criteria decision analysis, stability analysis, and uncertainty analysis using the info-gap technique. The DSS has been applied to four different non-cooperative water conflict including: (1) groundwater common pool; (2) environmental problem between two countries; (3) river conflict dispute between two countries; and (4) sustainable development game. The DSS demonstrates four stability concepts, including Nash Stability (R), General Metarationality (GMR), Symmetric Metarationality (SMR), Sequential stability (SEQ) to illustrate how results differ with regard to the stability concepts. After classifying the preferences of stakeholders, the DSS recognized the most stable solution, considering the potential actions and counteractions of all stakeholders. Consequently, solution robustness was tested under the uncertainty related to stakeholders’ perspective, under non-cooperative attitudes. When there are no sufficient details about the conflict and what decision to be prepared, the DSS proved to be useful in modeling complex disputes, determining most robust solution, and examining the effect of uncertainty.

  • References

    1. [1] Adams, G., G. Rausser, and, L. Simon, 1996. Modelling multilateral negotiations: an application to California Water Policy. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 30 (1), 97–111.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00844-X.

      [2] Ambec, S., L. Ehlers, 2008. Sharing a river among satiable agents. Games and Economic Behavior 64 (1), 35–50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.09.005.

      [3] Ben-Haim, Y., 2006. Information-gap decision theory: decision under severe uncertainty. San Diego, CA: Academic Presses Inc.

      [4] Ben-Haim, Y. and K. W. Hipel, 2002. The graph model for conflict resolution with information-gap uncertainty in preferences. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation, 126: 319–340.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(00)00161-2.

      [5] Dinar, A., and R. E. Howitt, 1997. Mechanisms for allocation of environmental control cost: empirical tests of acceptability and stability. Journal of Environmental Management 49, 183–203.https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1995.0088.

      [6] Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, and D. M. Kilgour, 1993. Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. New York: Wiley.

      [7] Hipel, K.W., Fang, L., Kilgour, D.M., Haight, M., 1993. Environmental conflict resolution using the graph model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17–20, pp. 17–20.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1993.384737.

      [8] Hipel, K. W., D. M. Kilgour, L. Fang, and J. Peng, 1997. The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Applied Mathematics and Computer, 83(2,3):117-152.

      [9] Kassab, M., 2009. Integrated decision support system for infrastructure privatization using conflict resolution. Thesis (PhD). Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

      [10] Kassab, M., K.W. Hipel, and T. Hegazy, 2006a. Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132 (10): 1043–1052.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:10(1043).

      [11] Kassab, M., K.W. Hipel, and T. Hegazy, 2006b. Multi-criteria decision analysis for infrastructure privatisation using conflict-resolution. Journal of Infrastructure Engineering, 00 (0): 1–11.

      [12] Mack, R. P., 1971. Planning and Uncertainty: Decision Making in Business and Government Admisinistration, Wiley, New York.

      [13] MacCrimmon, K. R., 1973. An overview of multiple objective decision making. In: J.L. Cochrance and M. Zeleny, eds. Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 18–44.

      [14] Madani, K., 2010. Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381: 225-238.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.045.

      [15] Madani, K., and J. Lund, 2011. A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Making under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources 34: 607–616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.009.

      [16] Obeidi, O., K. W. Hipel, and D. M. Kilgour, 2002. Canadian bulk water exports: analyzing the sunbelt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 14 (4): 145–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1020-2.

      [17] Raquel, S., S. Ferenc, C. Emery, and Abraham Jr., R., 2007. Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 84: 560–571.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.011.

      [18] Simon, L., R. Goodhue, G. Rausser, S. Thoyer, S. Morardet, and P. Rio, 2007. Structure and power in multilateral negotiations: an application to French Water Policy. Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. Monograph Series. Paper 47. <http://repositories.cdlib.org/giannini/ms/47>.

      [19] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006. Game Theory, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/game-theory/.

      [20] Wang, L., L. Fang, and K. W. Hipel, 2008. Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation. European Journal of Operational Research 190 (3), 798–817.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.045.

      [21] Madani, K., K.W. Hipel, 2011. Non-Cooperative Stability Definitions for straytegic analysis of generic water resources conflicts. Water Resources Management 25:1949-1977.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9783-4.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Aljuaidi, A. (2017). Decision support system analysis with the graph model on non-cooperative generic water resource conflicts. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 6(4), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v6i4.7566

    Received date: 2017-04-07

    Accepted date: 2017-08-24

    Published date: 2017-10-30