Machine Learning Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection
-
2018-06-05 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.9356 -
Machine Learning, Decision Tree, Neural Network, Logistic Regression, Precision and Recall. -
Abstract
With the extensive use of credit cards, fraud appears as a major issue in the credit card business. It is hard to have some figures on the impact of fraud, since companies and banks do not like to disclose the amount of losses due to frauds. At the same time, public data are scarcely available for confidentiality issues, leaving unanswered many questions about what is the best strategy. Another problem in credit-card fraud loss estimation is that we can measure the loss of only those frauds that have been detected, and it is not possible to assess the size of unreported/undetected frauds. Fraud patterns are changing rapidly where fraud detection needs to be re-evaluated from a reactive to a proactive approach. In recent years, machine learning has gained lot of popularity in image analysis, natural language processing and speech recognition. In this regard, implementation of efficient fraud detection algorithms using machine-learning techniques is key for reducing these losses, and to assist fraud investigators. In this paper logistic regression, based machine learning approach is utilized to detect credit card fraud. The results show logistic regression based approaches outperforms with the highest accuracy and it can be effectively used for fraud investigators.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] Jon TS Quah and M Sriganesh. Real-time credit card fraud detection using computational
Intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4):1721–1732, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.093.
[2] Tej Paul Bhatla, Vikram Prabhu, and Amit Dua. Understanding credit card frauds. Cards business review, 1(6), 2003.
[3] Christopher M Bishop et al. Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 4. Springer New York, 2006.
[4] Piotr Juszczak, Niall M Adams, David J Hand, Christopher Whitrow, and David J Weston. Off the peg and bespoke classifiers for fraud detection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(9):4521–4532, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.014.
[5] Ng, G., & Singh, H. (1997). Democracy in pattern classifications: combinations of votes from various pattern classifiers. Nanyang, Singapore: Elsevier.
[6] Maes, S., Tuyls, K., Vanschoenwinkel, B., & Manderick, B. (2002). Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Bayesian and Neural Networks. Brussel, Belgium.
[7] Zaki, M., & Meira, W. (2014). Data Mining and Analysis: Fundamental Concepts and Algorithms. New York City, New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810114.
[8] Sahin, Y., & Duman, E. (2011). Detecting Credit Card Fraud by Decision Trees and Support Vector Machines. Hong Kong, China: The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.
[9] Huang, S. (2013). Fraud Detection Model by Using Support Vector Machine Techniques. Chiayi, Taiwan: International Journal of Digital Content Technology & its Applications.
[10] Balaji, G. N., T. S. Subashini, and N. Chidambaram. "Detection of heart muscle damage from automated analysis of echocardiogram video." IETE Journal of Research 61.3 (2015): pp: 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2015.1009403.
[11] Ehramikar, S. (2000). The Enhancement of Credit Card Fraud Detection Systems. Toronto, Canada: Master of Applied Science Thesis, University of Toronto. V. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory Wiley, New York, 1998.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Venkata Suryanarayana, S., N. Balaji, G., & Venkateswara Rao, G. (2018). Machine Learning Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2), 917-920. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.9356Received date: 2018-02-02
Accepted date: 2018-04-27
Published date: 2018-06-05