Satellite image classification and quality parame-ters using ML classifier

  • Authors

    • K. Radhika
    • S. Varadarajan
    2018-02-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.9441
  • Classification, Classifier, Image, Multispectral, Satellite.

  • Abstract

    Remote sensing images are an important source of information regarding the Earth surface. For many applications like geology, urban planning, forest and land cover/land use, the underlying information from such images is needed. Extraction of this information is usually achieved through a classification process which is one of the most powerful tools in digital image processing. Good classifier is required to extract the information in satellite images. Latest methods used for classification of pixels in multispectral satellite images are supervised classifiers such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Number (K-NN) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) classifier. SVM may be one-class SVM or multi-class SVM. K-NN is simple technique in high-dimensional feature space. In ML classifier, classification is based on the maximum likelihood of the pixel. The performance metrics for these classifiers are calculated and compared. Totally 200 points have been considered for validation purpose.

  • References

    1. [1] Burges, C.J.C. (1988), A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2 (2), 121–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009715923555.

      [2] Swapna, Ch., Swetha K V V and Murthy J V R. (2015). A new approach to cluster datasets without prior knowledge of number of clusters, J SciInd Res, 74, 261-264.

      [3] Osornio Rios, R.A. (2017). Identification of positioning system for industrial applications using neural network, J SciInd Res, 76, 141-144.

      [4] Bakshi, S. Thakur, T. and Khanna, R. (2017). Performance analysis of a novel hybrid optimization technique for sizing and placement of DG units, J SciInd Res, 76, 203-207.

      [5] Bakshi S, Thakur T, Khanna R and Gupta A. (2017). DG placement and capacity calculation using an improved human opinion dynamics based optimization technique, J SciInd Res, 76, 427-432.

      [6] Mousavi, S.A., Hanifeloo, Z., Sumari, P. and Arshad, M. R. M. (2016) Enhancing The Diagnosis of Corn Pests Using Gabor Wavelet Features and SVM classification, J SciInd Res, 75, 349-354.

      [7] Sivakumar, S. and Venkatesan, R. (2016). Performance evaluation of hybrid evolutionary algorithms in minimizing localization error for wireless sensor networks, J SciInd Res, 75, 289-295.

      [8] Huang, W. Y and Lippmann, R.P. (1988), Neural Net and Traditional Classifiers, in Neural Information Processing Systems, 387–396.

      [9] Murali Mohan Babu, Y., Subramanyam, M.V., and Giriprasad, M.N. (2015). Fusion and Texture based Classification of Indian Microwave Data - A Comparative Studyâ€, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10, 1003-1010.

      [10] Murali Mohan Babu, Y.andRadhika, K. (2016).A new approach for microwave imagery de-noising, I J Image, Graph & Sig Proc, 52-60.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Radhika, K., & Varadarajan, S. (2018). Satellite image classification and quality parame-ters using ML classifier. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(1.8), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.9441

    Received date: 2018-02-09

    Accepted date: 2018-02-09

    Published date: 2018-02-09