Expected adverse health influences due to exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) and its environmental outcomes using Wistar rats as experimental animals

  • Authors

    • Abdelgadir M. I Department of chemistry, Faculty of Education, University of Bakht Alruda
    • Omer F. I
    • Omer M. A
    • Awad ElGeed B. A Department of chemistry, Faculty of science, University of Bakht Alruda, Eld – Duiem, Sudan
    • Hassan. MM Department of Food technology, Faculty of Agricultural technology and Fish Sciences, El Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan
    2023-09-06
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v11i1.32315

  • Abstract

    A sum of 32 Wistar rats were divided into four equal groups, each containing 8 rats. Study animals were freely subject to normal rodent diet and tap water. One group was put as control. The applied agents were exposed to glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH-400 mg kg–1) GSH (nmol g–1 tissue), (GBH-600 mg kg–1) GSH (nmol g–1 tissue) and (GBH-850 mg kg–1) GSH (nmol g–1 tissue) once per day as oral gavage for 6 weeks. Study results clearly revealed that (GBH) significantly (p≤0.05) decreased the levels of GSH in liver, kidney, and brain tissues, due to many reasons including poor diet, chronic disease, infection and constant stress, besides aging. Biological negative influences of glyphosate herbicide through the scientific community, including government and non-government organizations have increased their interest in detecting and controlling the environmental agents responsible for damages to the human health and sustainability of the ecosystems.

  • References

    1. Abdelghani, Assessment of the exposure of workers applying herbicide mixtures (2,4-D+Roundup, Garlon-3A+Roundup). Toxicity and fate of these mixtures in the environment. Summary report, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, State project no. 736-14-0067. Baton Rouge, LA (1995).
    2. Connolly, M. Leahy, K. Jones, et al. Environ. Res 165 (2018) 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.04.025.
    3. Samsel, S. Seneff, Interdiscip. Toxicol 6 (2013) 159–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2013-0026.
    4. D. Cattani, H. de. Cavalli, Rieg, et al. Mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity induced by glyphosate-based herbicide in immature rat hippocampus: involvement of glutamate excitotoxicity. Toxicology 320 (2014) 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2014.03.001.
    5. E. Bertoletti, Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental: Ensaios biológicos com organismos aquáticos e sua ação no contro-le E. Beutler, J. Lab. Clin. Med 61 (1963) 882–888.
    6. G. Chaufan, I. Coalova, M. Molina, Glyphosate Commercial Formulation Causes Cytotoxicity, Oxidative Effects, and Apoptosis on Human Cells: Differences With its Active Ingredient, International Journal of Toxicology 33 (1) (2014) 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581813517906.
    7. G.M. Williams, R. Kroes, I.C. Munro, Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 31 (2000) 65-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1999.1371.
    8. H. Ohkawa, N. Ohishi, K. Yagi, Anal. Biochem 95 (1979) 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3.
    9. J. Lipok, H. Studnik, S. Gruyaert, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf 73 (2010) 1681–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.017.
    10. J. S. de Souza, M. M. L. Kizys, R. R. da Conceição, et al. Toxicology 377 (2017) 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2016.11.005.
    11. J. Silva, M.B. Fonseca, Genética Toxicológica. 1 ed. Brasil: Alcance, (2003) 471.
    12. L. Fagerberg, B.M. Hallström, P. Oksvold, et al., Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of tran-scriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 13 (2014) 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.035600
    13. Ahmad, M. Pacheco, M. Santos, Enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants as an adaptation to phagocyte-induced damage in Anguilla anguilla L. following in situ harbor water exposure. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 57 (2004) 29.0–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00080-0.
    14. M. Hultberg, Cysteine turnover in human cell lines is influenced by glyphosate, Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 24 (2007) 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2007.01.002.
    15. N. Ullah, F.M. Khan, M. Mukhtiar, Human blood glutathione (GSH) as a tool for arsenic detoxification, Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 6 (2012) 17–23. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP11.310.
    16. R. Mesnage, N. Defarge, J. Spiroux de Vendômois, et al. Food Chem. Toxicol 84 (2015) 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.012
    17. S. Rose, S. Melnyk, O. Pavliv, et al. Evidence of oxidative damage and inflammation associated with low glutathione redox status in the autism brain, Transl Psychiatry 2 (2012) 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2012.61.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    M. I , A., F. I, O., M. A , O., ElGeed B. A, A., & MM, H. (2023). Expected adverse health influences due to exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) and its environmental outcomes using Wistar rats as experimental animals. International Journal of Medicine, 11(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v11i1.32315