Determinants of modern contraceptive preference among mothers (15-49 years) in central zone, Tigray region, Ethiopia; qualitative study finding

  • Authors

    • Merhawi Gebremedhin Haramaya university
    • Ayele Belachew Addis Ababa University
    • Demeke Desta IPAS Ethiopia
    2017-07-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v5i2.7791
  • Age 15-49, Contraceptive Preference, Ethiopia, Qualitative Study.

  • Abstract

    Contraceptive method choice is a fundamental indicator of quality of care in a family planning program. Contraceptive choice is one component of quality in family planning and offering minimum of three modern methods of contraceptives is a critical indicator. One-third of developing countries have many skewed method mixes, which is a risky for discontinuation, contraceptive dissatisfaction and unintended pregnancy. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of contraceptive is highly skewed, 76% for injectable. Therefore, the purpose of qualitative study was to assess determinants of modern contraceptive preference among reproductive age (15-49 years) in Central Zone of Tigray.

    Methodology: the study was conducted in the central zone of Tigray and community, and facility based qualitative cross-sectional study was applied. Six focus group discussion entails of reproductive age mothers and 15 In-depth Interview with health workers constitutes the sample. Data was first transcribed and then translated into English language. Open code software was applied to analyze data and data was coded segment by segment then categorized using thematic analysis to give meaning.

    Result: community’s awareness and acceptance to use modern contraceptives have improved from time to time. Contraceptive preference is determined by community acceptance, health care system problem, individual context and socio-cultural problem. For majority of respondents, preference to long acting contraceptive is mainly influenced by husband.

    Conclusion: currently, women are preferring short-acting contraceptive preferably injectable than long acting.Implanon is preferred next to injectable. A strong information, education and communication that address all portions of the population and able to change the community’s attitude should do at the grass root level.

  • References

    1. [1] United States Agency for International Development. (USAID, 2009). Contraceptive projections and the donor gap; meeting the challenge.

      [2] Andrew L., Jennifer A., Ntsiki M., and Mags B. (2006) Systematic review of contraceptive medicines “Does choice make a difference?†RHRU final report..

      [3] United Nations Population Fund. (UNFPA, 2011). The Global Program to Enhance Reproductive Health Commodity Security.

      [4] Mesganaw F. (2005). Quality of family planning in North West Ethiopia.Ethiop.J.Health Dev.; 19(5): 195-202.

      [5] Eric E. Seibe, Jane T. Bertran, Tara M. Sullivan. (2007). Changes in Contraceptive Method Mix In Developing Countries. International family planning perspective; 33(3): 117-23.

      [6] World Health Organization. (1993). Providing an appropriate contraceptive choices, what health worker need to know, MCH/FPP/93.3

      [7] John Ross, Karen Hardee, Elizabeth Mumford and Sherrine Eid. (2001). Contraceptive Method Choice in Developing Countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 28(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088273.

      [8] Charles picavet, Linda van, derleest enciel wijsen.(2011). Contraceptive decision -making background and outcome of contraceptive method, Rutgers WPF, 2-41.

      [9] Jane T. Bertrand, Janet R., Tara M. Sullivan & James Shelton. (2000). Skewed Method Mix: a measure of Quality in Family Planning Programs,.

      [10] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. (FDRE, 2011). National guideline for family planning services in Ethiopia.

      [11] Mengistu A. Lakachew W. Yilma M. (2000). Improving the range of contraceptive choices in Tehuledere woreda, South Wollo zone, Amhara Regional State, rural Ethiopia.

      [12] Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. (EDHS,2011).federal democratic republic of Ethiopia, central statistics agency.

      [13] Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. Central statistics authority, (CSAE,2007).population census commission, summary and statistical report.

      [14] United Nations Population Fund. (UNFPA,1994). Quality of family planning services; evaluation finding, (3), 1-8.

      [15] Christine D. Kira L.,Allison K., Kevin G., JodyS. (2012). Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making, , Contraception 88, 250-56.

      [16] M. Mehrab Ali, KhanM. Rahman. (1996). Determinants of contraceptive method-choice in rural Bangladesh, Center for health and population research, , working paper 117.

      [17] LU WEIQUN. (2008). Contraceptive choice among married women in Guizhou province: socio-cultural and relationship factors,.

      [18] Neeti Rustagi, D.K. Taneja, Ravneet Kaur and G.K. Ingle. (2010). Factors affecting contraception among women in aminority community in Delhi: a qualitative study, , Health and population,33 (1), 10-15.

      [19] Syed KhurramAzmat, Ghulam Mustafa, Waqas Hameed,Muhammad Ali, Aftab Ahmed, Mohsina Bilgrami. (2012). Barriers and perceptions regarding different contraceptives and family planning practices amongst men and women of reproductive age in rural Pakistan: a qualitative study; Pakistan Journal of Public health, (2), 1.

  • Downloads

    Additional Files

  • How to Cite

    Gebremedhin, M., Belachew, A., & Desta, D. (2017). Determinants of modern contraceptive preference among mothers (15-49 years) in central zone, Tigray region, Ethiopia; qualitative study finding. International Journal of Medicine, 5(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v5i2.7791

    Received date: 2017-05-17

    Accepted date: 2017-06-17

    Published date: 2017-07-13